Generation III Internal Engine 1997-2006 LS1 | LS6
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

Please help me understand the dis/advantages of more displacement

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 04-06-2006, 09:44 AM
  #1  
12 Second Club
Thread Starter
iTrader: (6)
 
maxf's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Kansas City, MO
Posts: 109
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default Please help me understand the dis/advantages of more displacement

I would like to know what some of the advantages and disadavantages of larger displacement motors are. Let's stick strictly to SBC's; motors like a stock LS1, a forged 346, a stroker 383, a 402, or a 408.

I am considering replacing my motor with a forged LS6 based block, at 346 ci. But I have the option of going with a 383, or an iron 370. I know the iron block weighs more (roughly 50 pounds I guess), but what kind of horsepower gains would I see from more displacement?

Is it worth the extra money to go with a 383 instead of, say, a 346? (Assuming everything is identical except the stroke.) Would there be any special gains for my application, which is a Procharger?

What would any disadvantages be to greater displacement? (Aside from more weight due to an iron block vs. aluminum.)

Thanks in advance for any help. I appreciate anything I can find out
Old 04-06-2006, 10:15 AM
  #2  
TECH Senior Member
 
PREDATOR-Z's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: BFE
Posts: 14,620
Likes: 0
Received 16 Likes on 16 Posts

Default

more cubes=more power= more torque

BTW iron block is ~92 lbs more than alum.

Difference in price between 346 and 383 is around $1000 if you use eagle crank
Old 04-06-2006, 10:41 AM
  #3  
12 Second Club
Thread Starter
iTrader: (6)
 
maxf's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Kansas City, MO
Posts: 109
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Any disadvantages from going to a 346 to 383 stroker?
Old 04-06-2006, 11:29 AM
  #4  
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (23)
 
brad8266's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Watertown, NY
Posts: 8,797
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

No, except that you will make a lot more power.
Old 04-06-2006, 11:46 AM
  #5  
TECH Senior Member
 
PREDATOR-Z's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: BFE
Posts: 14,620
Likes: 0
Received 16 Likes on 16 Posts

Default

reduced gas mileage
excessive tire wear
increased traffic violations
Old 04-06-2006, 12:32 PM
  #6  
TECH Addict
iTrader: (4)
 
ShevrolayZ28's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Massachusetts
Posts: 2,318
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

Increasing the bore or stroke effects the rod ratio, which could cause some wear concerns.
Old 04-06-2006, 01:09 PM
  #7  
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (4)
 
GuitsBoy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Long Island, NY
Posts: 6,249
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by ShevrolayZ28
Increasing the bore or stroke effects the rod ratio, which could cause some wear concerns.
I agree here. Also, having a larger throw will limit max rpm, or atleast increase stresses at the same RPM.

But there are plenty of pros to outweight the few cons.
Old 04-06-2006, 03:07 PM
  #8  
Flow Wizard
iTrader: (13)
 
Tony Mamo @ AFR's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 2,197
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts

Default

Build the biggest engine you can afford....period....end of story.

Assuming the exact same breathing abilities (same heads, intake, cam, CR, exhaust system, etc.) the bigger engine will make more TQ down low and more peak TQ, and about the same peak power but it will happen sooner which means less RPM, less piston speed, and similar "wear" on parts due to lower RPM (versus better "rod ratio" combination at higher RPM's). Honestly rod ratio is over-rated and even the big LS1 builds still have decent numbers (in the 1.5 vicinity).

The bigger motor will simply have more average power and TQ and due to that fact will still get you down the track a little faster even though the peak HP is about the same. Other big benefit is streetability as the big engine will have much better TQ at part throttle and will idle smoother with the same cam and all things being equal.

The only two downsides are cost to build and slightly larger appetite for fuel.

The adage "there is no replacement for displacement" still hold true.....

Tony M.
Old 06-17-2006, 06:27 PM
  #9  
11 Second Club
 
oztrack's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 121
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Will cruise economy be the same or any worst - since there is more low torque?? Or do the 383s lose economy everywhere?

Would someone hazard a guess at gains if i changed my car to a 383 and left everything else the same. Its done 11.414/118.6mph at 3600lb
Old 06-17-2006, 06:36 PM
  #10  
jrp
SN95 Director
iTrader: (16)
 
jrp's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Valencia, Ca
Posts: 10,755
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts

Default

this is tony's motor. all things equal, only thing different is the 4" stroke.





All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:24 PM.