Generation III Internal Engine 1997-2006 LS1 | LS6
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

Are dyno #'s usually "corrected?"

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 01-13-2007, 02:42 PM
  #1  
Teching In
Thread Starter
 
clubber's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Salt Lake City, Utah
Posts: 33
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default Are dyno #'s usually "corrected?"

I've got an '02 LS-1 in an RX-7 'vert that was dyno'ed recently. Since I live at about 4500 ft, the raw numbers are a little dissapointing at 339hp and 348 tq. These numbers are uncorrected and I'm wondering if most dyno's correct for standard press and temps. Is there any "standard" way the numbers are done? The car only has a cam and if corrected, it doesn't look so bad (390 hp or so).
Old 01-13-2007, 03:02 PM
  #2  
TECH Apprentice
iTrader: (1)
 
pianoprodigy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Tampa Bay Area, FL
Posts: 315
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Yes, a dyno sheet that is not SAE corrected is pretty much worthless for comparison purposes.
Old 01-13-2007, 06:18 PM
  #3  
11 Second Club
iTrader: (10)
 
SSNISTR's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Florida
Posts: 2,728
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

SAE corrected is the way to go....some like to use uncorrected #'s 'cause they usually are alot higher. My uncorrected #'s were like 18 RWHP higher.
Old 01-13-2007, 06:23 PM
  #4  
TECH Apprentice
iTrader: (1)
 
pianoprodigy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Tampa Bay Area, FL
Posts: 315
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

In his case, however, his corrected numbers will be higher.
Old 01-13-2007, 07:56 PM
  #5  
TECH Apprentice
iTrader: (2)
 
Proud2bSS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Reno, NV
Posts: 346
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Would his corrected numbers basically tell him what he would be running at sea level, as opposed to what he is really getting at 4500 ASL? or have I got it backwards?
Old 01-13-2007, 08:28 PM
  #6  
Teching In
Thread Starter
 
clubber's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Salt Lake City, Utah
Posts: 33
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

The way I understand it, the sea level #'s would be higher in my case. I looked up the correction factors on another website and I was supposed to add 15% to get the corrected HP numbers.
Old 01-14-2007, 12:54 AM
  #7  
11 Second Club
iTrader: (3)
 
Kraest's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Covington, LA
Posts: 687
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Yes.

SAE Corrected.
Old 01-14-2007, 11:53 AM
  #8  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (1)
 
RedHardSupra's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Laurel, MD
Posts: 1,904
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

power comes from airflow. airflow comes from airmass and rpm. airmass is air density * displacement * volumetric efficiency. air density depends on air pressure and air temperature. thus if you keep rpm, displacement, ve constant, then power depends on air pressure and temp, that's why all standard corrections give you temp and pressure. once you convert your particular results to the standard environment conditions, you can compare power output.

this site gives you a good rundown of how it works, and some calculators so you get an idea how much this stuff changes with temp/altitude
http://wahiduddin.net/calc/density_altitude.htm
Old 01-15-2007, 03:40 PM
  #9  
TECH Apprentice
 
deuce_454's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Copenhagen
Posts: 369
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

corrected... well be there when they dyno it.. its easy for a not so honest engine shop to "invent" horsepower when correcting.. for example, if the shop heater just happened to be close to the temp sensor on the chassisdyno.. that would gice a higher ambient, and increase your so called corrected rwhp.. and the tricks go on...
Old 01-15-2007, 04:13 PM
  #10  
11 Second Club
iTrader: (4)
 
LostCauseZ06's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Ogden, Utah
Posts: 1,294
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by clubber
I've got an '02 LS-1 in an RX-7 'vert that was dyno'ed recently. Since I live at about 4500 ft, the raw numbers are a little dissapointing at 339hp and 348 tq. These numbers are uncorrected and I'm wondering if most dyno's correct for standard press and temps. Is there any "standard" way the numbers are done? The car only has a cam and if corrected, it doesn't look so bad (390 hp or so).


dude you were at our dyno day huh! yes the numbers were uncorrected. i was in the red Z06




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:26 AM.