Generation III Internal Engine 1997-2006 LS1 | LS6
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

Track Results BBK SSI vs. Mamo Ported FAST

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 05-27-2007, 02:18 PM
  #1  
8 Second Club
Thread Starter
iTrader: (9)
 
Black X's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: CANADA!
Posts: 558
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default Track Results BBK SSI vs. Mamo Ported FAST

Hey Guys, I know this doesnt really belong in the internal section but I am very exited with these results and I know this section gets a lot of traffic. I recently built a new motor for my truck and felt that I was lacking a little in the Intake area due to a few more cubic inches. The BBK worked great on my 5.3L and Is an excellent intake. Here are my new results.

Background on the truck
2002 Chevrolet S-10 Xtreme
370CID Iron Block
Stock Crank and rods
Diamond Flat tops with -2cc reliefs
Patriot Stage II LS6 Heads 64cc
Comp 228/230 .571/.573 112+4
Shorty 1 5/8" headers ( I Know they are tiny)

Trans is a home bult 4L60E
Yank SS3600 Converter
Currie Enterprises 9" w/3.73s

WEIGHT: 3800 w/driver

Results from BBK SSI
Best time...
60' 1.707
1/8 7.564
MPH 90.66
1/4 11.931
MPH 111.89


Results from Tony Mamo Ported FAST 90MM w. Nick Williams TB

60' 1.716
330 4.84
1/8 7.500
MPH 92.04
1000 9.831
1/4 11.788
MPH 117.55

Thats a 6 MPH Gain Needless to say I am very impressed.


Now for all of you Considering the Mamo Ported FAST, I can say that the workmanship put into this is worth every single penny you spend. Tony puts countless hours into making these intakes perform how they do and it really shows. Unfortunatly to protect Tonys business I cant post pictures of the runners but they are completly reshaped and smoothed. There is a lot of time spent making sure there are no obstructions in the path of the airflow.

The part that really surpised me was how smooth he is able to make the transitions. If you didnt know what a stock FAST intake runner looks like you may not even know someone was working on the intake. Tonys customer service is second to none! I can't imagine how much time he must spend returning PM's and speaking with people. I can tell you I single handedly bombarded his inbox for weeks about this intake and every single PM was returned with a very thoughfull and fully explained responce, never once was I given a short answer or a push to the side.

I had my reservations about spending the extra money for Tony's porting work or just bolting it on stock out of the box (as Im sure a lot of you do as well). After seeing some of Tony's other results and speaking and PM'ing him a few times, I felt comfortable it was the right move. Needless to say I'm ecstatic about the results and couldn't be happier about my decision to have him go thru it. I hope my experience makes it a little easier for some of you to pull the trigger....you wont be disappointed!


Now lets add a little nitrous to the mix
125HP jets
60' 1.586
330 4.440
1/8 6.903
MPH 101.74
1000 9.034
1/4 10.816
MPH 129.01



I hope this helps the to Mamo or not to Mamo decision

Last edited by Black X; 05-27-2007 at 07:03 PM.
Old 05-27-2007, 03:14 PM
  #2  
TECH Resident
iTrader: (26)
 
04gtoBMXracer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Albuquerque nm
Posts: 783
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

link doesnt work
Old 05-27-2007, 05:41 PM
  #3  
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (16)
 
ls1muscle's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Birmingham, AL
Posts: 577
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

That's an enormous amount of mph gain for an intake. What was the DA difference?
Old 05-27-2007, 07:03 PM
  #4  
8 Second Club
Thread Starter
iTrader: (9)
 
Black X's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: CANADA!
Posts: 558
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

Link fixed
Old 05-27-2007, 10:20 PM
  #5  
12 Second Club
iTrader: (6)
 
Viper's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Cleveland, OH
Posts: 4,908
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts

Default

That's hauling the mail!! Nice run.
Old 05-28-2007, 01:17 AM
  #6  
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (10)
 
Sweet71's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Edmonton, CANADA
Posts: 515
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Right on man, wicked gains thats for sure!!
Old 05-28-2007, 12:49 PM
  #7  
pdd
TECH Veteran
iTrader: (3)
 
pdd's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: dudley mass
Posts: 4,156
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

thats killer! tony does awesum work
Old 05-28-2007, 12:58 PM
  #8  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (3)
 
Mike94ZLT1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Livonia, Mi
Posts: 1,455
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

I gotta say... I really like that truck!
Old 05-28-2007, 09:38 PM
  #9  
TECH Resident
iTrader: (16)
 
mr2guru's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Kansas City Area
Posts: 855
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

So does this say something about how good tony's porting is or how bad the BBK SSI is? :p
Old 05-28-2007, 10:00 PM
  #10  
LS1 Tech Administrator
iTrader: (14)
 
Patrick G's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Victoria, TX
Posts: 8,244
Likes: 0
Received 31 Likes on 27 Posts

Default

Impressive gains! I love my Mamofied FAST!
__________________

2013 Corvette Grand Sport A6 LME forged 416, Greg Good ported TFS 255 LS3 heads, 222/242 .629"/.604" 121LSA Pat G blower cam, ARH 1 7/8" headers, ESC Novi 1500 Supercharger w/8 rib direct drive conversion, 747rwhp/709rwtq on 93 octane, 801rwhp/735rwtq on race fuel, 10.1 @ 147.25mph 1/4 mile, 174.7mph Half Mile.
2016 Corvette Z51 M7 Magnuson Heartbeat 2300 supercharger, TSP LT headers, Pat G tuned, 667rwhp, 662rwtq, 191mph TX Mile.
2009.5 Pontiac G8 GT 6.0L, A6, AFR 230v2 heads. 506rwhp/442rwtq. 11.413 @ 121.29mph 1/4 mile, 168.7mph TX Mile
2000 Pewter Ram Air Trans Am M6 heads/cam 508 rwhp/445 rwtq SAE, 183.092 TX Mile
2018 Cadillac Escalade 6.2L A10 Pat G tuned.
LS1,LS2,LS3,LS7,LT1 Custom Camshaft Specialist For custom camshaft help press here.
Custom LSX tuning in person or via email press here.
Old 05-28-2007, 10:45 PM
  #11  
Flow Wizard
iTrader: (13)
 
Tony Mamo @ AFR's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 2,197
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by mr2guru
So does this say something about how good tony's porting is or how bad the BBK SSI is? :p
Certainly a little bit of both....LOL

Without a question one of the more bizarre gains from the addition of one of my ported intakes.

Even assuming his former intake was 10 worse than an LS1 or LS2 intake (two of the weakest stock cathedral port designs), a 40 RWHP gain still wouldn't add up to that gain in trap speed.

When James (Black X) asked me what I thought of the results I told him I should have charged him more....

Hell....he must have gotten at least one pony for every PM he sent me! (Sorry....I couldn't resist!!)

Seriously though, numerous PM's aside, it was good dealing with him and I'm obviously pleased things worked out so well. While Im sure there were other factors at play here, the results are the results and every now and then you get a surprise on the upside with the addition of a certain mod....helps compensate for all those mods that were a bit disappointing and we have all been there!!

Cheers,
Tony
Old 05-28-2007, 11:02 PM
  #12  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (3)
 
Louie83's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Dayton, OH
Posts: 1,844
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Tony Mamo @ AFR
When James (Black X) asked me what I thought of the results I told him I should have charged him more....

Hell....he must have gotten at least one pony for every PM he sent me! (Sorry....I couldn't resist!!)


If that were the case, then I would owe Patrick like $500. The bad part (actually extremely good part) is that Gunnar is completely re-doing my used Patriot heads I bought for free....gonna have to slightly adjust for whatever changes are made and speak to my chief engineer.

Once again, a ported 90/90 proves its worth, which is why I continually promote them and will eventually have one.
Old 05-28-2007, 11:11 PM
  #13  
TECH Junkie
 
1989GTA's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 3,092
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts

Default

IMHO those are excellant results. I'm flabbergasted. That has to be money well spent. Heck I would have thought the gains would be good with 1/3 of the results.
Old 05-29-2007, 09:24 AM
  #14  
Launching!
 
BigBake's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Viginia Beach, VA
Posts: 260
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by ls1muscle
That's an enormous amount of mph gain for an intake. What was the DA difference?
Good point. What was the DA differences between those passes?
Old 05-29-2007, 04:43 PM
  #15  
8 Second Club
Thread Starter
iTrader: (9)
 
Black X's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: CANADA!
Posts: 558
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

Unfortunatly I dont have the DA of the passes. I do know the weather conditions were almost Identical on both days.
Old 05-29-2007, 05:01 PM
  #16  
8 Second Club
Thread Starter
iTrader: (9)
 
Black X's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: CANADA!
Posts: 558
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

on another note I raced on a day that was 30* warmer and at a completely different track about 1000ft higher in elevation and still did 112.73MPH a Solid gain over the BBK even if it were at the same track.
Old 06-01-2007, 01:29 AM
  #17  
On The Tree
 
Zentenk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 169
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Now port out the BBK =D
Old 06-01-2007, 11:03 AM
  #18  
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (10)
 
SIC LSX's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Bossier city,LA barksdale AFB
Posts: 5,355
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts

Default

good deal! It would of been even faster with a EFI vic jr setup
Old 06-02-2007, 02:54 PM
  #19  
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (46)
 
Oh4GTO's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Atlanta, GA
Posts: 525
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Zentenk
Now port out the BBK =D
Yeah and compare a ported intake to a ported intake.
Old 06-02-2007, 04:10 PM
  #20  
Flow Wizard
iTrader: (13)
 
Tony Mamo @ AFR's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 2,197
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Oh4GTO
Yeah and compare a ported intake to a ported intake.
Wouldn't even be a contest....the FAST simply has a superior plenum and runner design and ported its even more efficient.

As Ive mentioned in a few of my other posts, Im not affiliated with FAST in any way, shape, or form. I simply want the best cathedral head manifold on my car and recommend the same to my customers. When Im convinced a better one has come along, you can bet your bottom dollar I will run and recommend that.

Tony



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:40 AM.