Generation IV Internal Engine 2005-2014 LS2 | LS3 | LS7 | L92 | LS9

whats it worth in HP.......11.3:1 to 12.5:1

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 10-10-2011, 05:00 PM
  #1  
Banned
Thread Starter
iTrader: (2)
 
LS6427's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: South Florida
Posts: 11,291
Likes: 0
Received 11 Likes on 11 Posts

Default whats it worth in HP.......11.3:1 to 12.5:1

Just on your typical stroker motor, say a 427-454 size LSx......

Nice size cam.....all else being equal pretty much, except a jump in compression.

.
Old 10-10-2011, 07:18 PM
  #2  
TECH Addict
iTrader: (83)
 
Gray86hatch's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Battle Creek Mi
Posts: 2,388
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts

Default

4-5% is a good #
Old 10-10-2011, 08:53 PM
  #3  
Banned
Thread Starter
iTrader: (2)
 
LS6427's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: South Florida
Posts: 11,291
Likes: 0
Received 11 Likes on 11 Posts

Default

Thanks.

So is it about 4-5% for each point increase in compression?

.

Last edited by LS6427; 10-10-2011 at 09:04 PM.
Old 10-10-2011, 11:33 PM
  #4  
Launching!
iTrader: (4)
 
racerfox's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Posts: 200
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

you cant run on the street unless you run race gas with that comp..
Old 10-10-2011, 11:37 PM
  #5  
10 Second Club
iTrader: (9)
 
82cetuner's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Denham Springs, LA
Posts: 1,368
Likes: 0
Received 7 Likes on 7 Posts

Default

thats not true its in the tune I have heard of people running up to 13 and if it really is a issue you can always swich to E85.
Old 10-10-2011, 11:41 PM
  #6  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (31)
 
Pwebbz28's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Denton, Tx
Posts: 1,248
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

Originally Posted by racerfox
you cant run on the street unless you run race gas with that comp..
Or e85 :-)

Yes, for every 1 point in compression you are looking at a 4% increase in power. I you make 700 with 11:1 you will make about 725-730 with 12:1.
Old 10-10-2011, 11:53 PM
  #7  
Banned
Thread Starter
iTrader: (2)
 
LS6427's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: South Florida
Posts: 11,291
Likes: 0
Received 11 Likes on 11 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by racerfox
you cant run on the street unless you run race gas with that comp..
Its a 100% street car.....will never see a drag track......weekend warrior, fun car. Maybe 2,000 miles a year.

I'm having a 441ci built...I was wondering if its worth it to go higher compression than the typical 11:1 or 11:3.1, and go 12.5:1 or maybe even 13:1....since using full time race gas is no issue for me. 101, 110, E85..whatever.

I also want to be able to spray a 200 shot though.....is 13:1 too high for that much spray?

Because to have what amounts to possibly 50 more HP (10% more from 11.3:1 to 13:1 cr) for N/A driving....why not......

.
Old 10-11-2011, 12:04 AM
  #8  
TECH Junkie
iTrader: (28)
 
gnx7's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: San Francisco, CA
Posts: 3,453
Received 150 Likes on 97 Posts

Default

if you can get e85 it is less than 1/2 the price of 100/110/116 octane. I would run that.
Old 10-11-2011, 12:32 AM
  #9  
Banned
Thread Starter
iTrader: (2)
 
LS6427's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: South Florida
Posts: 11,291
Likes: 0
Received 11 Likes on 11 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by gnx7
if you can get e85 it is less than 1/2 the price of 100/110/116 octane. I would run that.
Its easy to get here. Plus I was gonna do what my friend and his father do....they have a 200-300 gallon tank they fill up for their fun toys and it sits in their back yard with an electric pump.

They trailer it a station to fill it when it gets low.

***Can an engine set up for E85 also use 110...with no changes?

.
Old 10-11-2011, 08:14 AM
  #10  
On The Tree
 
good2go's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Posts: 194
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by racerfox
you cant run on the street unless you run race gas with that comp..
Depends on the cam. Keep your dynamic compression ratio down with a big cam and you can get away with a lot. I'm running about 11.8 to12:1 static CR with pump gas, 24 degrees of timing, no knock. Because of my cam my DCR is only 8.5:1.
Old 10-11-2011, 11:40 AM
  #11  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (4)
 
Bill00Formula's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: West Palm Beach, Fl
Posts: 1,066
Likes: 0
Received 11 Likes on 9 Posts

Default

Just out of curiousity, why wouldn't you take it to the track just to see how it runs?
Old 10-11-2011, 11:56 AM
  #12  
Banned
Thread Starter
iTrader: (2)
 
LS6427's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: South Florida
Posts: 11,291
Likes: 0
Received 11 Likes on 11 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Bill00Formula
Just out of curiousity, why wouldn't you take it to the track just to see how it runs?
Maybe I'd go up to Moroso for the heck of it some day, but its an hour drive up and an hour drive back......plus its not set up for 1/4 mile launches and I'm on radials. So it'll be very un-representative of its true potential. I really have no interest in drag racing to be honest, doesn't do it for me.

Isn't it safe to say with 800 RWHP the car would have 8 second potential...IF it was set up for drag racing?

.
Old 10-11-2011, 12:26 PM
  #13  
Old School Heavy
iTrader: (16)
 
speedtigger's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Florida
Posts: 8,826
Received 50 Likes on 32 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Gray86hatch
4-5% is a good #
Originally Posted by Pwebbz28
Yes, for every 1 point in compression you are looking at a 4% increase in power. I you make 700 with 11:1 you will make about 725-730 with 12:1.
This is not correct. It is not a simple percentage per point of compression. The gains diminish as the compression increases. There is a much larger increase from 8:1 to 9:1 then there is from 12:1 to 13:1.

Originally Posted by good2go
Depends on the cam. Keep your dynamic compression ratio down with a big cam and you can get away with a lot. I'm running about 11.8 to12:1 static CR with pump gas, 24 degrees of timing, no knock. Because of my cam my DCR is only 8.5:1.
This is true to a degree. This also is not a simple formula. Once the engine comes into it's range of volumetric efficiency, the cam is no longer bleeding off pressure. In fact, it is increasing it. DCR is a helpful tool, but it is only part of the equation.

Here is an article with a chart from Popular HotRodding that illustrates the diminishing benefits of adding compression.

Read more: http://www.popularhotrodding.com/tec...#ixzz1aUhiazku

The above chart is not perfect either. More of an example of the diminished returns. The dance is: static compression, dynamic compression and volumetric efficiency. Those factors all together produce the final answer. Because of this, I always temper theoretical ideas with real world experience. I look at what other racers have been successful with in comparison to the theoretical data as a double check.
Old 10-11-2011, 12:47 PM
  #14  
Banned
Thread Starter
iTrader: (2)
 
LS6427's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: South Florida
Posts: 11,291
Likes: 0
Received 11 Likes on 11 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by speedtigger
This is not correct. It is not a simple percentage per point of compression. The gains diminish as the compression increases. There is a much larger increase from 8:1 to 9:1 then there is from 12:1 to 13:1.



This is true to a degree. This also is not a simple formula. Once the engine comes into it's range of volumetric efficiency, the cam is no longer bleeding off pressure. In fact, it is increasing it. DCR is a helpful tool, but it is only part of the equation.

Here is an article with a chart from Popular HotRodding that illustrates the diminishing benefits of adding compression.

Read more: http://www.popularhotrodding.com/tec...#ixzz1aUhiazku

The above chart is not perfect either. More of an example of the diminished returns. The dance is: static compression, dynamic compression and volumetric efficiency. Those factors all together produce the final answer. Because of this, I always temper theoretical ideas with real world experience. I look at what other racers have been successful with in comparison to the theoretical data as a double check.
I'm just wondering if the approximate 50 HP increase from 11.3:1 to 13:1 will be worth having to use race gas or E85 full time. Whatever the increase is will just be a bonus because running the race gas or E85 is absolutely no problem at all.


Another question: If I do go 13:1 does that mean 110 octane minimum?

.
Old 10-11-2011, 01:41 PM
  #15  
Old School Heavy
iTrader: (16)
 
speedtigger's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Florida
Posts: 8,826
Received 50 Likes on 32 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by LS6427
I'm just wondering if the approximate 50 HP increase from 11.3:1 to 13:1 will be worth having to use race gas or E85 full time. Whatever the increase is will just be a bonus because running the race gas or E85 is absolutely no problem at all.


Another question: If I do go 13:1 does that mean 110 octane minimum?

.
I have no experience with E85. But, 13:1 definitely means racing gas all the time. Another resources is your cam manufacturer. They will also give you their compression recommendation for a given cam or vice versa. The whole thing is about volumetric efficiency in a given RPM range and cylinder pressures. The volatility of the fuel and the burn rate have to be a good match for your set up. You want to match your cam and compression closely. If I were in your shoes, I would consult the cam manufacturer and start talking to the guys on YellowBullet.com. It is a rough crowd, but that is the best place I know of to share practical experience with people running racing fuels and E85 on high compression set ups.
Old 10-11-2011, 02:27 PM
  #16  
Banned
Thread Starter
iTrader: (2)
 
LS6427's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: South Florida
Posts: 11,291
Likes: 0
Received 11 Likes on 11 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by speedtigger
I have no experience with E85. But, 13:1 definitely means racing gas all the time. Another resources is your cam manufacturer. They will also give you their compression recommendation for a given cam or vice versa. The whole thing is about volumetric efficiency in a given RPM range and cylinder pressures. The volatility of the fuel and the burn rate have to be a good match for your set up. You want to match your cam and compression closely. If I were in your shoes, I would consult the cam manufacturer and start talking to the guys on YellowBullet.com. It is a rough crowd, but that is the best place I know of to share practical experience with people running racing fuels and E85 on high compression set ups.
Cool, I'll check it out, thanks.

.



Quick Reply: whats it worth in HP.......11.3:1 to 12.5:1



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:44 PM.