antonio84

Well i went to tsp today and got my combo tuned and the results are 393hp and 366tq idk if its me or should i have gotten more out of it. What do yall think?

98RedBird

iTrader: (77)

That was with an unlocked converter I assume? Sounds low to me.

tillery

iTrader: (4)

Not really. DTR is open this weekend. Take er out and see.

tillery

iTrader: (4)

BTW, Whats your compression.

antonio84

yeah it was.

antonio84

if i remember correctly it should be 10:4 or 10:5 since the heads are not milled.

stumprrp

iTrader: (2)

400 horse through an auto sounds great to me man

'Trust'

iTrader: (24)

TQ seems pretty low. What are the specs on the cam? Those 3.73's are going to rob some too.

JRC2000SS

dont worry bout it dude... my numbers arent even better. i did 5.3 2.5's with torquer3 and only did 415! and did i forget 2 mention that i have an m6. i wana know if ne one else has bought these heads and put low numbers too?

tillery

iTrader: (4)

with our alt. in west tx. its not that bad. dont be disapointed. give some miles on the combo. and retune as nessasary. take it to the track and see what she will do. im in a nbm ta. will hbelp if i can

venom ws7

iTrader: (13)

With unmilled heads stall gears small cam and A4 I think those numbers are great.

take to the track you'll love it high mid 11s for sure.

PewterScreaminMach

iTrader: (7)

Not too bad considering the auto, stall, and fairly mild cam. Actually, you put down almost the same number I do with my mild H/C setup. I put down 400/367 with 224/228 cam and LS6 heads. Only difference is I'm running through a heavy M6 drivetrain versus your fairly normal auto drivetrain, so they're probably evening each other out.

With your auto and stall, assuming full weight, you should hit mid 11s at 116 or so no problem if you're hooking up.

antonio84

228/228 588/588 112.

antonio84

my friend dynoed his car in san antonio and only made 410 and he has m6 with heads and cam (the cam is alittle bigger than the ms3).

Johnnystock

iTrader: (6)

Good numbers for auto. Numbers dont tell the story; run it at the track and check the MPH.

Scoggin Dickey

iTrader: (34)

Those are great numbers. Remember, it's a stalled auto and the makes the numbers look low. It will severely outperform a T56 car that makes the same numbers

Sales2@Texas-speed

iTrader: (5)

x3. She'll be a strong runner!

A few years ago, we had a stock bottom end H/C car that dyno'd 408rwhp through the heavy driveline it had....she ran a 10.5x@12X at sea level!

PewterScreaminMach

iTrader: (7)

It will severely outperform a T56 car with the same numbers ET-wise, but not trap-speed-wise, and certainly not cruising on the highway, for example. Just a thought.

oneBADDz

iTrader: (26)

If you were talking about a 350rwhp auto beating a 400rwhp T56 car in the 1/4 mile you would be right in that the T56 would have higher trap mph, but when they make the same power at the wheels, that is not correct.

Lower HP autos can beat a higher hp T56 in the 1/4 and the T56 will be catching it because of greater HP at the wheels. But when they have the same RWHP, the T56 will not be gaining on the auto, that wouldn't make any sense since we are talking about rear wheel horsepower here.

PewterScreaminMach

iTrader: (7)

The difference is not in the rwhp but in the gearing of the transmission. The T56 car stays in it's powerband better than an A4 car and if both had an identical graph from the same dyno, same weight, chances are the M6 car will be trapping a higher speed. Not necessarily a lot higher, but why do you think the new Corvettes, G8s, and high end European sports car have all gone A6 (or more) over the past few years? The fact is if you keep the car in it's powerband for a longer amount of time, it will be faster.