LeadSled1

Whats the quickest anyone has gone with a non stroker or big bore motor? Power adders included.


Thanks,
Jess

Reckless

iTrader: (9)

Mike Brown with 9.85 at 138 on stock bottom end

EVIL

big mike, 9.80

theres 5 or 6 or maybe more 9 sec 346 cars.

Reckless

iTrader: (9)

I just know Mike's time because we are neighbors. I know he is the fastest stock bottom end, but there are others in the 9's with built 346 motors.

EVIL

the twin turbo is your neighbor! i need to live in that neighborhood! all my neighbors think im a nut.

RUQWIKR

iTrader: (11)

10.50 at 128.04 for me N/A with bone stock shortblock and trans (except for converter). RECKLESS and others can vouch for the car as I made 14 runs at Norwalk on 10/17 at the COFBA with 10 between 10.50 and 10.57...plus one 10.60 on a big bog, one 10.62 spinning, one 10.77 with a 200# passenger, and one completely wasted run...blew the tires away trying to leave at flash stall.

Take care. Dave

Ron@Vengeance

iTrader: (51)

See sig, my first and only pass on the juice. I got booted for no cage after that pass. Cage is in, going back and gonna try to whittle that time down a lil.

LS1LT1

iTrader: (16)

Isn't it still Big Mike and his Cartek powered SS?

TransAm2002

iTrader: (3)

I hope to be in the 9's someday, but I am not sure if it will be a 346 anymore.

Reckless

iTrader: (9)

Dave's car (ruquikr) is very impressive. Pulls the wheels like the big dogs! And runs very consistently. Although, your skinny buddy was no where near 200 pounds :p

Mike lives about 10 minutes from me. He is an alright guy, I guess. I am gonna squish his *** at the track next year though

BigKevC5

9.85@135 on a stock bottom end LT1.....so far.....9.60s expected in 2 weeks

RUQWIKR

iTrader: (11)

He's 188# nekkid...he's all muscle where I weigh about the same nekkid, both pushing 200#'s with out firesuits and helmets we had on. Let's put it this way, if we were both running down the beach without a shirt on, he'd look like David Hasselhoff and I'd have my C-cup manbreasts a bouncin' closer to the likes of Pam Anderson! Anyways, you get the ugly picture. Take care and we'll both see you at the COFBA event at Norwalk in the spring.

Big Mike

iTrader: (4)

I currently have the quickest stock ci. LS1 with a power adder. On November 10th I will be looking to take the car to the 9.5x range with nothing changed on the car at all. Just a better track and much much better weather.

Reckless

iTrader: (9)

LMAO Dave, but not a real pretty image

Big Mike! Where you been? :p

Chicago Crew UnderBoss

iTrader: (1)

Man those are some awesome N/A ets and mph for stock cubes. What is your race weight? Must be stripped down a bit i would guess. Best i have seen on the forums! Whose heads and cam package you running and what type of dyno numbers is that bad boy running. Let me guess, your running a YANK 4400 PT converter. Better start saving for a built tranny with the power that bitch is running!

BADZ

iTrader: (5)

I plan on getting a mid 9 sec pass also, ran a 10.05 with just a 175 shot so will see how it acts on a 250-300 shot....

RUQWIKR

iTrader: (11)

3131#'s raceweight is light, but I've seen lighter, and obviously, heavier ones, too...Lingenfelter / GM Performance Parts CNC'd LS6's. Yes on the Yank. BTW, I keep waiting to hurt the trans, but I have over 200 10 and 11-sec passes plus a bunch of 12-sec ones on the stock trans (except for the converter). Car has only 2,000 miles on it a lot 1/4 at a time but still has the original trans fluid.

For durability, I keep torque management activated but have always had the force control motor pins unplugged at the PCM. This ensures 100% line pressure and quickest shift solenoid speeds...however, if you don't have a loose converter, don't do this or it will snap your neck even in the parking lot.

BTW, I have done back-to-back runs with torque management off and on and cannot see more than a few hundreths. I know some guys swear more, but for what I've seen, I'm not worried about it thus far.

Finally, on dyno numbers, I don't have any and don't care to...too much variation between dynos and dyno types. I race enough and keep meticulous notes and data logs (via Tech 2) to not worry about dyno numbers. Plus, with the 4400, 12-bolt, etc., it would post a number a lot less than many others. Take care.