LT1-LT4 Modifications 1993-97 Gen II Small Block V8

A I or A F R

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 05-06-2009, 12:49 AM
  #1  
TECH Senior Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (8)
 
gregrob's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: 6,000+ feet
Posts: 5,130
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts

Default A I or A F R

and why?

I'm looking at the 195cc Eliminator heads from AFR.

Discuss...

Last edited by gregrob; 05-06-2009 at 12:59 AM.
Old 05-06-2009, 01:18 AM
  #2  
TECH Resident
iTrader: (108)
 
za355tx's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Dfw
Posts: 969
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

If you are set on deciding between these two I'd have AI do a set of heads. They will definitely outperform an out of the box set of AFR 195's.
Old 05-06-2009, 01:57 AM
  #3  
TECH Regular
 
BLK,97,T/A,M-6's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 434
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

what will the heads be going on? stock cube? in that case, ported stockers will do the job.. I am interested in building a ballz out hr 396. Im considering the afr 210 eliminators, but want to find a reputable porter to go over them. I know AI will work on trickflows, which are nice pieces themselvs, but i dont know if they play with afr's.
Old 05-06-2009, 02:17 AM
  #4  
TECH Senior Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (8)
 
gregrob's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: 6,000+ feet
Posts: 5,130
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by za355tx
If you are set on deciding between these two I'd have AI do a set of heads. They will definitely outperform an out of the box set of AFR 195's.
What proof do you have of this, and what do you mean by "outperform". Is that solely peak hp? or 1/4 mi times?

I'm looking for "average hp" "area under the curve" whatever you want to call it.

I'm not being a jerk or trying to be incendiary, just asking...
Old 05-06-2009, 02:18 AM
  #5  
TECH Senior Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (8)
 
gregrob's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: 6,000+ feet
Posts: 5,130
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by BLK,97,T/A,M-6
what will the heads be going on? stock cube? in that case, ported stockers will do the job.. I am interested in building a ballz out hr 396. Im considering the afr 210 eliminators, but want to find a reputable porter to go over them. I know AI will work on trickflows, which are nice pieces themselvs, but i dont know if they play with afr's.
Stock shortblock, or a mild 355 if budget allows.
Old 05-06-2009, 02:25 AM
  #6  
TECH Resident
iTrader: (108)
 
za355tx's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Dfw
Posts: 969
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

I mean all around they will out do a set of AFR 195's. AFR claims all these high flow numbers and stuff but you throw a set of those on a realistic flow bench and ported stock heads will make more hp all the way around.
Old 05-06-2009, 08:25 AM
  #7  
TECH Veteran
iTrader: (17)
 
Puck's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 4,152
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes on 6 Posts

Default

It all depends on your combo and how much you want to spend - and going by your combo I would say ported stockers would be plenty.

If you have AFRs gone over by hand they cannot be touched by pretty much any 23* head. Then you are looking at twice the cost though.
Old 05-06-2009, 08:49 AM
  #8  
TECH Fanatic
 
WS Sick's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Kingfisher Oklahoma
Posts: 1,157
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by za355tx
I mean all around they will out do a set of AFR 195's. AFR claims all these high flow numbers and stuff but you throw a set of those on a realistic flow bench and ported stock heads will make more hp all the way around.
I believe the answer he was wanting was some reference to proof not just this is true because I said it.
Old 05-06-2009, 11:40 AM
  #9  
11 Second Club
iTrader: (5)
 
SpeedDensityZ's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Macclenny FL
Posts: 852
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

My last combo was with the same exact bottom end. AFR 190cc CNC'd heads. They were suppose to flow 265int. Anyway. Car ran low 12's consistantly. There was a guy at the track about 2 years ago running AFR 195cc Eliminator series heads and was running 12.30's @112 with a CC306 cam and a 355. Keep in mind with Ai you get a custom cam to match your setup. My times and hp are in my sig. I made over 400rwtq before 3200 rpm. and carried it all the way through peaking at 423 at about 5100. I don't have a side by side comparison.
Old 05-06-2009, 12:11 PM
  #10  
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (26)
 
kinglt-1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Ft. Wayne, IN
Posts: 5,794
Received 196 Likes on 138 Posts

Default

There are cars trappin 112-113 with the cc306 cam only. Unless your shootin for 450whp + na, ported stock heads will do work!!
Old 05-06-2009, 12:41 PM
  #11  
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (36)
 
ss.slp.ls1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Orange County, CA
Posts: 8,188
Received 26 Likes on 24 Posts

Default

My vote is for some ported stockers.
Old 05-06-2009, 12:48 PM
  #12  
11 Second Club
iTrader: (5)
 
SpeedDensityZ's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Macclenny FL
Posts: 852
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by kinglt-1
There are cars trappin 112-113 with the cc306 cam only. Unless your shootin for 450whp + na, ported stock heads will do work!!
What kind of numbers are you getting from those LPE heads you have. Is that Lingenfelter?
Old 05-06-2009, 01:11 PM
  #13  
10 Second Club
iTrader: (2)
 
Dave J's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Toronto Canada
Posts: 539
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I have untouched afr 210`s and they arent even the eliminators and I think they do quite well for what they are
one day I will get them ported and put a n2o hit and see how they do
If I did it over I would have got the afr 227`s
Old 05-06-2009, 01:39 PM
  #14  
Teching In
 
superbad's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Posts: 5
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

i have afr's and there rockin.. couldnt ask for more..if your looking for a full modded motor id go with the afr's.I bent a valve on my ported stock heads and had to do a rebuild. my afr's are wayyy better then my stock ported ones were
Old 05-06-2009, 04:24 PM
  #15  
TECH Fanatic
 
WS Sick's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Kingfisher Oklahoma
Posts: 1,157
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

I have the old AFRs 190s on my 9.8 to 1 compression 383 with a GM 847 cam . It traps low 120s regularly, I think the work it trapped on a complete run was 118 mph.

I had the same heads on a 355 with the cc305 cam and it trapped 113 to 114 mph.

This is in Oklahoma at 1500 feet elevation, weather is different every other minute here, the temp can range from 50 to 100 degrees in a few days during spring and fall. Its worthless to try to get a good time during the Summer Hot and humid, its just for fun.

Before I had the AFR 190s onthe 355 I had a set of ported stockers , ported by a local machine shop, they flowed in the 250/190 cfm range. with 2.00/1.56 valves. He said the runner size was about 185ish.
My best mphs with that set-up was 110-111.

I'm sure AI and LE are good products and should get you going. One thing an aftermarket head brings to the table of course is thicker decks, better designed exhaust ports (just look at even crappy AFR exh flow numbers), and in most cases fixes to ailments of factory stuff. (dual bolt patterns throughout and large spring seats).

Money is obviously the limiting factor since a set of complete aftermarket heads are from 1500 to 2500 and porting (which when ported there is no comparrison) can bring them close and to 3000$.
Old 05-06-2009, 04:40 PM
  #16  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (42)
 
Tireburnin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: San Diego, CA
Posts: 1,005
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts

Default

It isn't quite a fair comparisson when looking at AFR flow numbers next to ported stock heads. AFR flows thier heads on a 4.125 bore and with a pipe on the exhaust. Ai flows on a 4.030 and uses no pipe.

4-7% lower on the small bore and a good deal lower by not flowing with an exhaust pipe.
Old 05-06-2009, 04:44 PM
  #17  
TECH Fanatic
 
WS Sick's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Kingfisher Oklahoma
Posts: 1,157
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Tireburnin
It isn't quite a fair comparisson when looking at AFR flow numbers next to ported stock heads. AFR flows thier heads on a 4.125 bore and with a pipe on the exhaust. Ai flows on a 4.030 and uses no pipe.

4-7% lower on the small bore and a good deal lower by not flowing with an exhaust pipe.
Thats not entirely true, the smaller port heads from AFR were flowed on anything from a 4.00 to a 4.060 bore. in my literature.

But unless you flow heads side by side on the same bench arent flow bench numbers just relative?
Old 05-06-2009, 05:14 PM
  #18  
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (26)
 
kinglt-1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Ft. Wayne, IN
Posts: 5,794
Received 196 Likes on 138 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by SpeedDensityZ
What kind of numbers are you getting from those LPE heads you have. Is that Lingenfelter?
Yes they are ported stock castings done by al @ LPE. I do not have flow numbers because he ported them on the side for 600.00. I think I paid 950 total for the ported heads, manley severe duty 2.0 1.60 valves, and ported/port matched intake. The only thing I have to compare is my car runs dead close to a supra around here and it's trapping low 120's! Sorry not tryin to bench race, but thats all I have for comparison lol!
Old 05-06-2009, 06:28 PM
  #19  
11 Second Club
iTrader: (1)
 
SS MPSTR's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: SoCal
Posts: 1,510
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

Originally Posted by WS Sick
But unless you flow heads side by side on the same bench arent flow bench numbers just relative?
As I understand it, yes. Just like dyno's.
Old 05-06-2009, 06:50 PM
  #20  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (42)
 
Tireburnin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: San Diego, CA
Posts: 1,005
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by WS Sick
Thats not entirely true, the smaller port heads from AFR were flowed on anything from a 4.00 to a 4.060 bore. in my literature.

But unless you flow heads side by side on the same bench arent flow bench numbers just relative?
Couldn't agree more. I was just referencing statements about the flow.

My personal oppinion on bench numbers is that they are all but irrelevant in the real world where my car runs down the track.


Quick Reply: A I or A F R



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:40 AM.