Generation III Internal Engine 1997-2006 LS1 | LS6
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

Gains from ported 243 castings

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 09-12-2010, 12:40 AM
  #1  
In-Zane Moderator
Thread Starter
iTrader: (25)
 
ZONES89RS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Conroe, Texas
Posts: 11,939
Received 32 Likes on 19 Posts

Default Gains from ported 243 castings

Right now, my car traps 91.86 MPH with a LQ4, stock 317s with a Trex cam, LS swap header 1 3/4, vic Jr intake, 750 carb and about 33 total timing in my 89 with a T56 and 4.30s, heads are pretty much untouched, knowing my compression will go up more where the Trex will be happy and getting more flow out of a set of 243s that flow 300ish will make the car move allot better, but how much MPH might i expect to gain from the head swap? I built a 6.o with rods and flat tops with 317s and i ported them a bit with a torqer V2 cam, timing was in about 32 and the rest was the same with a stalled TH350 and 3.42 hears, trapped 96.3x, so i am assuming the compression itself going up alone is going to help and i am trying to figure out if i can expect 4 MPH more with a set of good ported 243s.

(sure i would probably go stalled auto but that is not what i want so dont bring it up)
Old 09-12-2010, 01:44 AM
  #2  
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (96)
 
01ssreda4's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Turnin' Wrenches Infractions: 005
Posts: 24,240
Likes: 0
Received 79 Likes on 70 Posts

Default

I think a 4 mph gain is very attainable with a good set of 243s.
Old 09-12-2010, 08:44 AM
  #3  
LS1Tech Premium Sponsor
iTrader: (4)
 
Jason 98 TA's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Texas!
Posts: 4,229
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts

Default

Absolutely 4mph is possible. You can gain compression and flow. We could build you 62cc ls6 heads cnc ported with stock p/v to keep your p/v
__________________
Jason
Co-Owner, Texas Speed & Performance, Ltd.
2005 Twin Turbo C6
404cid Stroker, 67mm Twins
994rwhp/902lb ft @ 22 psi (mustang dyno) www.Texas-Speed.com
Old 09-12-2010, 09:27 AM
  #4  
11 Second Club
 
big dave's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Silver Spring, Md.
Posts: 955
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 3 Posts

Default

4 mph seems like quite a lot in the 1/8th from just a head swap. Wouldn't that work out to around 6-7 mph in the quarter? My h/c swap only gave me a total of 7-8 more mph. I thought you would see larger gains from just a cam swap over a head swap.

Is the 4 mph increase possible now because of the size of the cam that's currently in the car? Are the stock heads restricting the ability of the cam to work to its full potential? If that is the case, I can then see why just a head swap would provide that much more power.

Last edited by big dave; 09-12-2010 at 09:34 AM.
Old 09-12-2010, 11:19 AM
  #5  
TECH Veteran
iTrader: (9)
 
King Nothing's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Central Valley
Posts: 4,763
Likes: 0
Received 20 Likes on 18 Posts

Default

zane, this is a stupid question but i'll ask it anyway lol why the low trap speed?
Old 09-12-2010, 11:31 AM
  #6  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (5)
 
99SS-T's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Phoenix AZ
Posts: 1,005
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Stock 243 to stock 317 should flow the same no? I thought they were the same cept the cc of the combustion chamber? GL!
Old 09-12-2010, 12:02 PM
  #7  
12 Second Club
iTrader: (12)
 
twitchtwice's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 2,612
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

Originally Posted by 99SS-T
Stock 243 to stock 317 should flow the same no? I thought they were the same cept the cc of the combustion chamber? GL!
title says ported 243
Old 09-12-2010, 03:03 PM
  #8  
In-Zane Moderator
Thread Starter
iTrader: (25)
 
ZONES89RS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Conroe, Texas
Posts: 11,939
Received 32 Likes on 19 Posts

Default

Alright, that is what i was hoping for, since i was not haing flow or compression alone, not to mention the LS6 head is supposed to have a better more efficient chamber for burn.


Originally Posted by King Nothing
zane, this is a stupid question but i'll ask it anyway lol why the low trap speed?

Hell, i see cammed LS1s trapping 87 or so, so i dint think 92 was a bad thing for a junk yard 6.0 with a cam stuffed in, the Trex bogs on my launching at 5100, scared of breaking the drive shaft, i might trap higher if i launch at 6500 maybe? Hell, i am not sure. A smaller cam would do me better honestly. But to hell with that, i like the Trex, im on a budget and it presented itself for 200$.
Old 09-12-2010, 03:27 PM
  #9  
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (6)
 
X-ray's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Harrisburg, PA
Posts: 548
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

Originally Posted by King Nothing
zane, this is a stupid question but i'll ask it anyway lol why the low trap speed?
You realize that was in the 1/8 mile right?
Old 09-12-2010, 03:43 PM
  #10  
11 Second Club
iTrader: (11)
 
Nemesis350's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Central TX
Posts: 429
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by X-ray
You realize that was in the 1/8 mile right?
LOL with the setup at hand you'd almost think that was a given...
Old 09-13-2010, 12:22 AM
  #11  
TECH Veteran
iTrader: (9)
 
King Nothing's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Central Valley
Posts: 4,763
Likes: 0
Received 20 Likes on 18 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by X-ray
You realize that was in the 1/8 mile right?
Originally Posted by Nemesis350
LOL with the setup at hand you'd almost think that was a given...
you guys don't worry about smog yet you only have 1/8 mile races, we have the smog ****'s and we have 1/4 races . . . i'm not used to seeing 1/8 times cause we don't do 1/8 times unless track conditions are **** (doesn't happen much)
Old 09-13-2010, 02:14 AM
  #12  
In-Zane Moderator
Thread Starter
iTrader: (25)
 
ZONES89RS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Conroe, Texas
Posts: 11,939
Received 32 Likes on 19 Posts

Default

LOL, you really thought i was trapping 92 in the 1/4? LOL, that would make me want to set my car on fire.
Old 09-13-2010, 07:42 AM
  #13  
TECH Veteran
iTrader: (31)
 
bjamick's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Birmingham AL.
Posts: 4,218
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts

Default

I was wondering this myself as I'm planning on getting my 243's ported and polished. If 4mph can be expected in the 1/8, I'm doing that.
Old 09-13-2010, 10:34 AM
  #14  
TECH Veteran
iTrader: (9)
 
King Nothing's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Central Valley
Posts: 4,763
Likes: 0
Received 20 Likes on 18 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by ZONES89RS
LOL, you really thought i was trapping 92 in the 1/4? LOL, that would make me want to set my car on fire.
well i find out new things everyday lol
Old 09-13-2010, 10:47 AM
  #15  
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (7)
 
$750 L98's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Round Rock, Texas
Posts: 723
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by ZONES89RS
LOL, you really thought i was trapping 92 in the 1/4? LOL, that would make me want to set my car on fire.

Hey hey hey, I was trapping 101 in the 1/4 with a cammed 6.0....









But it was running 8.5:1 compression, spit out the MAP sensor, shorted an O2 and shifted to OD after the 8th
Old 09-13-2010, 05:56 PM
  #16  
In-Zane Moderator
Thread Starter
iTrader: (25)
 
ZONES89RS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Conroe, Texas
Posts: 11,939
Received 32 Likes on 19 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by $750 L98
Hey hey hey, I was trapping 101 in the 1/4 with a cammed 6.0....









But it was running 8.5:1 compression, spit out the MAP sensor, shorted an O2 and shifted to OD after the 8th
Yea, but a carb doesnt have those issues, WIN!
Old 09-14-2010, 09:44 AM
  #17  
TECH Addict
iTrader: (22)
 
slow trap's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: tennessee
Posts: 2,639
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

4 mph should be attainable. not only will you pick up quite a bit of hp but your bottom end tq should pick up also to help get that thing out of the hole quicker.
Old 09-14-2010, 10:43 AM
  #18  
12 Second Club
iTrader: (13)
 
WSsick's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: St. Peters, MO
Posts: 2,418
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by ZONES89RS
Hell, i see cammed LS1s trapping 87 or so, so i dint think 92 was a bad thing for a junk yard 6.0 with a cam stuffed in
Wow, cammed LS1s trapping 87? I do that in my bolt-on car in the 1/8. Thats pathetic but considering your (budget) setup, Id say 92 is doing just fine and I can definitely see 4mph in the 243s.
Old 09-14-2010, 02:26 PM
  #19  
10 Second Club
iTrader: (1)
 
mike c.'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: mi
Posts: 4,033
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts

Default

A nice afr or trick flow head will gain more.
Old 09-14-2010, 06:34 PM
  #20  
In-Zane Moderator
Thread Starter
iTrader: (25)
 
ZONES89RS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Conroe, Texas
Posts: 11,939
Received 32 Likes on 19 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by WSsick
Wow, cammed LS1s trapping 87? I do that in my bolt-on car in the 1/8. Thats pathetic but considering your (budget) setup, Id say 92 is doing just fine and I can definitely see 4mph in the 243s.
Just what i see local cars running out here.

Originally Posted by mike c.
A nice afr or trick flow head will gain more.
Not in my budget unfortunately.



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:52 PM.