Dynamometer Results & Comparisons Dyno Records | Dyno Discussion | Dyno Wars

Does this sound about right for power?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 08-05-2011, 08:29 AM
  #1  
Launching!
Thread Starter
iTrader: (2)
 
ripgtp97's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: neversink, ny
Posts: 297
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Question Does this sound about right for power?

2000 Trans am A4
When I first dynoed the car all it had on was a borla-non adjustable catback. With a misfiring issue do to a cam sensor.
car made: 280 hp 290 tq

Now it has 1 3/4 long tubes, ORY, LM2 catback, Lid/k&n, P&P TB, ls6 intake, and a tune

it made 335hp and 340tq
So it looks like it gained 55 hp and 50 tq

Does all of that add up to be about right for what went into it and is it safe to say my car is somewhat of a "dud" with a low baseline
Old 08-05-2011, 08:43 AM
  #2  
Teching In
iTrader: (1)
 
410strokerss's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Clarksville , TN
Posts: 37
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by ripgtp97
2000 Trans am A4
When I first dynoed the car all it had on was a borla-non adjustable catback. With a misfiring issue do to a cam sensor.
car made: 280 hp 290 tq

Now it has 1 3/4 long tubes, ORY, LM2 catback, Lid/k&n, P&P TB, ls6 intake, and a tune

it made 335hp and 340tq
So it looks like it gained 55 hp and 50 tq

Does all of that add up to be about right for what went into it and is it safe to say my car is somewhat of a "dud" with a low baseline

the sensor problem surely hurt ya and retarded your timing for sure..
Old 08-05-2011, 08:47 AM
  #3  
Launching!
Thread Starter
iTrader: (2)
 
ripgtp97's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: neversink, ny
Posts: 297
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

yeah for sure, with that fixed though, assuming the power would go back up to around 300 stock, shouldn't I be seeing higher numbers with everything added and the timing fixed?
Old 08-05-2011, 10:23 AM
  #4  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (6)
 
LeanPocket's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Corpus Christi Texas
Posts: 1,122
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

Originally Posted by ripgtp97
yeah for sure, with that fixed though, assuming the power would go back up to around 300 stock, shouldn't I be seeing higher numbers with everything added and the timing fixed?
yes its close to where it should be, but it should be a lil higher
Old 08-05-2011, 10:29 AM
  #5  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (6)
 
LeanPocket's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Corpus Christi Texas
Posts: 1,122
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

might sound stupid but uh, how does ur fuel filter look? Air filter? Plugs? Oil? Proper Gasoline Octane? Trans fluid? might be bogging it down
Old 08-05-2011, 10:33 AM
  #6  
Launching!
Thread Starter
iTrader: (2)
 
ripgtp97's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: neversink, ny
Posts: 297
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Filter is like new, just installed tr 55 plugs with ngk wires, oil is actually due for a change, 93 octane. haven't checked the fuel filter

just a little bummed with the work into it, its only at 335
Old 08-05-2011, 01:17 PM
  #7  
TECH Apprentice
iTrader: (5)
 
idle's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Indianapolis, IN
Posts: 390
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I'd figure you'd be about 340ish at least... just sayin'.
Old 08-05-2011, 02:01 PM
  #8  
TECH Resident
iTrader: (3)
 
ds98formula's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Joliet Illinois
Posts: 966
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

I would say it's not too low. It is a auto. Underdrive pulley and stall and run mid12's easy
Old 08-05-2011, 02:45 PM
  #9  
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (16)
 
BAMALS1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Rocket City
Posts: 734
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

I say that's really good for the mods...my car made 290/289 with a lid, catback, underdrive pulley, ls1intake, CAI, and 3600 converter.

314/314 after header install and Y

My best e.t. is 12.47 @109 with 2.73's
Old 08-05-2011, 03:39 PM
  #10  
Launching!
Thread Starter
iTrader: (2)
 
ripgtp97's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: neversink, ny
Posts: 297
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

ah i see, yeah the tuner said he's seen variations anywhere from 30 hp less to even 30hp more than where I'm at so it really depends on the car

this was on a mustang dyno too, so probably more realistic than a dynojet so ive heard

either way i'm taking it to the track in a couple of weeks, excited to see what it puts down
Old 08-05-2011, 04:17 PM
  #11  
TECH Addict
iTrader: (6)
 
Johnnystock's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Canada
Posts: 2,675
Received 38 Likes on 25 Posts

Default

Sounds realistic for an auto on a mustang. Dont forget its internet; everyone has a better rwhp than you and me..
Old 08-05-2011, 11:28 PM
  #12  
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (16)
 
BAMALS1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Rocket City
Posts: 734
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

I dont think its a dud, might suprise you.
Old 08-06-2011, 08:36 PM
  #13  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (63)
 
67RSCamaroVette's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: The trailer park
Posts: 1,959
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts

Default

was it a mail order tune or a dynotune?
Old 08-07-2011, 11:27 AM
  #14  
Launching!
Thread Starter
iTrader: (2)
 
ripgtp97's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: neversink, ny
Posts: 297
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

dynotune, on a mustang dyno
Old 08-07-2011, 11:43 AM
  #15  
On The Tree
 
dirkdiggler350's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: CT
Posts: 179
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Those numbers are right on for what you have done, I put down 330/330 with pretty much same mods on his dyno. Put a stall in it and it will be a different car. Don did a yank 3600 in my car and it was best mod I've done so far.
Old 08-07-2011, 01:38 PM
  #16  
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (26)
 
kinglt-1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Ft. Wayne, IN
Posts: 5,794
Received 196 Likes on 138 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by LeanPocket
yes its close to where it should be, but it should be a lil higher
It's a A4, those numbers are solid.
Old 08-07-2011, 02:03 PM
  #17  
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (16)
 
BAMALS1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Rocket City
Posts: 734
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Like everyone has said strong numbers for sure...don't be dissapointed...see what it puts down at the track
Old 08-07-2011, 02:15 PM
  #18  
On The Tree
 
T.Man's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Desert
Posts: 124
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts

Default

Numbers look good with regard to a loaded dyno and being an A4. Have fun with her OP!
Old 08-07-2011, 02:52 PM
  #19  
TECH Junkie
iTrader: (4)
 
s346k's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: johnson co.
Posts: 3,433
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

well, the dyno did show a positive gain from the mods. as long as it traps 109+ i'd be happy with it.
Old 08-07-2011, 06:10 PM
  #20  
Launching!
Thread Starter
iTrader: (2)
 
ripgtp97's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: neversink, ny
Posts: 297
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

well this all sounds reassuring, thanks guys!

and dirkdiggler, I can't wait to stall it. That's next at the same time as my gears




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:47 PM.