Generation III Internal Engine 1997-2006 LS1 | LS6
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

Too much duration?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 10-30-2011, 02:39 PM
  #1  
12 Second Club
Thread Starter
 
Hemi2Slo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: A small town, MS
Posts: 281
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default Too much duration?

I've got an 04 sierra with a 5.3 with 241 heads shaved .050. Right now I'm running a 224/224 cam but I want to change to give myself more towing power. Everybody has told me to get a 212/218 cam to tow. So I been reading and I decided to spec my own cam. I came up with 212XE/220XER, .558/.581, 112 LSA, 108 ICL. I went with the XER on the exhaust for the agressiveness because I only have shorty headers. My question is, do you guys think that the exhaust duration is too much? Should I stick with 218 or will I be good with 220? Thanks in advance.
Old 10-30-2011, 04:29 PM
  #2  
10 Second Club
iTrader: (24)
 
chrs1313's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 5,697
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts

Default

to be honest 2* isn't going to affect anything...you are probably talking 2-5hp/tq difference...
Old 10-30-2011, 05:06 PM
  #3  
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (35)
 
99Bluz28's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: C. V., Kalifornia
Posts: 9,705
Likes: 0
Received 11 Likes on 11 Posts
Default

IMO, the 220* xer should be fine on the exhaust side, but a 210* xfi(.595") on the intake side would be a better choice than the 212 xe lobes.
Old 10-30-2011, 05:22 PM
  #4  
12 Second Club
Thread Starter
 
Hemi2Slo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: A small town, MS
Posts: 281
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Thanks for the replies. I thought about the XFI lobe but unless I can get that lobe in less than .590 lift I really can't use it. My valve clearance will only clear .590, as far as I know.
Old 10-30-2011, 05:28 PM
  #5  
TECH Resident
 
Paul57's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Frozen Tundra, WI
Posts: 859
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

I have this "Torque Monster" (per article) cam available if you are interested...Crane 1449551. It has zero miles/time on it. (Cam is sold)
http://www.hotrod.com/techarticles/e...camshafts.html

Last edited by Paul57; 11-27-2011 at 12:34 AM.
Old 10-30-2011, 05:40 PM
  #6  
12 Second Club
Thread Starter
 
Hemi2Slo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: A small town, MS
Posts: 281
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Well my friend and I are gonna try to go together and get a couple cams, maybe at a discount we hope. But, what would be the advantage to the XFI lobe? Would a 206* .585 XFI work, or would that be getting too small?
Old 10-30-2011, 05:50 PM
  #7  
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (35)
 
99Bluz28's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: C. V., Kalifornia
Posts: 9,705
Likes: 0
Received 11 Likes on 11 Posts
Default

Imo, if you want prolong the life of the valve train, and have it quieter then you could get the 220* with the xe lobes also.

Yeah I looked at the xfi 206, but I think it's to small. You'll be better off with the 212*xe lobe.
Old 10-30-2011, 05:54 PM
  #8  
12 Second Club
Thread Starter
 
Hemi2Slo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: A small town, MS
Posts: 281
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I see. Yeah my current cam has XER lobes both sides. Its quiet, but I also have LS7 lifters, so that may be helping the noise factor.
Old 10-30-2011, 06:21 PM
  #9  
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (35)
 
99Bluz28's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: C. V., Kalifornia
Posts: 9,705
Likes: 0
Received 11 Likes on 11 Posts
Default

The 210* xfi will offer more duration at .200" lift than the 212* will, so you'd get a little more hp/tq with a slightly low powerband.
Old 10-30-2011, 06:32 PM
  #10  
12 Second Club
Thread Starter
 
Hemi2Slo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: A small town, MS
Posts: 281
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Well that's what I'm lookin for but I'm worried about valve clearance. My heads are stock 241's shaved .050. I have dish pistons. Would .595 lift clear you think?
Old 10-30-2011, 07:20 PM
  #11  
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (35)
 
99Bluz28's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: C. V., Kalifornia
Posts: 9,705
Likes: 0
Received 11 Likes on 11 Posts
Default

I would think you'd be perfectly fine with the .595" lift with running a lot less intake duration, but there's only one way to know for sure, that's to check.
Old 10-30-2011, 08:16 PM
  #12  
10 Second Club
iTrader: (24)
 
chrs1313's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 5,697
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts

Default

duration is much more of a factor than lift is for ptvc
Old 10-30-2011, 08:25 PM
  #13  
12 Second Club
Thread Starter
 
Hemi2Slo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: A small town, MS
Posts: 281
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

So then, what I need to calculate is at what point the intake would be at maximum lift. I know that if it isn't at greater than .590 I'm good
Old 11-26-2011, 11:42 PM
  #14  
Staging Lane
iTrader: (3)
 
Xaviarrahl's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 58
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

Anyone else running that 1449551 cam? Looks like a good option for those running stock lq4... Shorter duration should help maintain DCR with the relatively low SCR




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:05 PM.