Automotive News, Media & Press Television | Magazines | Industry News

Muscle Car Wars Circa 1985

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 05-20-2012, 01:33 PM
  #1  
TECH Veteran
Thread Starter
 
TriShield's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Phoenix, AZ Hometown: Aberdeen, SD
Posts: 4,231
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default Muscle Car Wars Circa 1985

Hey man, it's the 80s.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8Y0tOZco-jg

I would take that IROC though.
Old 05-20-2012, 02:18 PM
  #2  
TECH Addict
iTrader: (14)
 
djsanchez2's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Simi Valley, CA.
Posts: 2,727
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

LMFAO!! Cheesy as **** and completely sad that they were talking up such weak sauce cars.
Old 05-20-2012, 02:46 PM
  #3  
Staging Lane
 
Wile E's 98's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Kentucky
Posts: 64
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Ahh.... Good times. Factory performance has come a long way in the last 25 years lets hope it keeps going.
Old 05-20-2012, 05:21 PM
  #4  
TECH Junkie
iTrader: (28)
 
whytryz28's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Hawaii
Posts: 3,758
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

I wasn't even alive.

BIGGGGGGGGG 4 barrels screamer!!!!! HYOOOGGEEEE swaybars!!!!
Old 05-20-2012, 09:22 PM
  #5  
TECH Fanatic
 
TransAmWS.6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Maryland
Posts: 1,313
Received 9 Likes on 8 Posts

Default

It's amazing that those used to be considered fast, there are fullsize trucks nowadays that can perform up to par with those cars. I like that Camaro though
Old 05-20-2012, 09:34 PM
  #6  
TECH Veteran
iTrader: (21)
 
1CAMWNDR's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Posts: 4,247
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by TransAmWS.6
It's amazing that those used to be considered fast, there are fullsize trucks nowadays that can perform up to par with those cars. I like that Camaro though
We were thrilled to see those cars show up. You have to realize that just 3 years before that all of them were sub 180hp I think. 1985 was the beginning of the return of decent muscle cars.
Old 05-20-2012, 09:36 PM
  #7  
TECH Veteran
Thread Starter
 
TriShield's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Phoenix, AZ Hometown: Aberdeen, SD
Posts: 4,231
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by djsanchez2
LMFAO!! Cheesy as **** and completely sad that they were talking up such weak sauce cars.
They weren't weak at the time. In that era people were still arguing that carbs were better and that fuel injection was a step back. They also thought that V8s were the only way to go for drag racing. That is until the Buick turbos got potent for 1986 and 1987 and started clowning on everything.
Old 05-20-2012, 09:52 PM
  #8  
Douchebag On The Tree
 
justin455's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Indianapolis, IN
Posts: 1,268
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts

Default

Hmmm...so fox bodies are made of jello. Interesting.
Old 05-20-2012, 09:53 PM
  #9  
Now you have my attention
iTrader: (1)
 
GTOSE's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Mesa, AZ
Posts: 2,324
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts

Default

Outstanding video! I love when old comparo's like this are posted, thanks!

Also, **** the haters. Iroc-Z's are awesome, and are STILL the best handling production Camaro's.

The TPI motor set the foundation for modern day fuel injected cars, IMO.
Old 05-20-2012, 09:56 PM
  #10  
Deranged Rat Fink
iTrader: (3)
 
badjuju342's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Right here at my laptop, DUH!
Posts: 4,499
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

Originally Posted by whytryz28
I wasn't even alive.
I had graduated high school the year before.
Lol at gatorbacks , haven't heard that term for years, they were throwing them on cop cars.
Old 05-20-2012, 09:57 PM
  #11  
TECH Resident
 
1ltcap's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: NJ
Posts: 812
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by 1CAMWNDR
We were thrilled to see those cars show up. You have to realize that just 3 years before that all of them were sub 180hp I think. 1985 was the beginning of the return of decent muscle cars.
actually, 1979 was the beginning. if ford hadn't introduced the fox bodied gt, i don't think chevy would've done anything with the camaro.........and may even have discontinued it much sooner than they did..........
Old 05-20-2012, 10:36 PM
  #12  
10 Second Club
iTrader: (16)
 
LS1LT1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Posts: 9,331
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Thumbs up

One of those three clowns was Craig Singhaus, I believe he is STILL with Motorweek Television to this day and is still a Mustang guy (his older Mustang with an exhaust leak was even used to close the TV show for many years).



Originally Posted by TriShield
They weren't weak at the time. In that era people were still arguing that carbs were better and that fuel injection was a step back. They also thought that V8s were the only way to go for drag racing. That is until the Buick turbos got potent for 1986 and 1987 and started clowning on everything.
True, I remember that era very well.
I had wanted an '85 IROC Z 5.0L TPI so badly but my parents wouldn't let me get it (even though it was with my own money LOL). But finally in 1987 as I was graduating college I got to order my new IROC Z28 5.7L (glad I'd waited to get the bigger motor (the mighty B2L which was almost identical to the Corvette's L98).
Fun car.
Old 05-20-2012, 10:47 PM
  #13  
10 Second Club
iTrader: (16)
 
LS1LT1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Posts: 9,331
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Lightbulb

Originally Posted by 1CAMWNDR
We were thrilled to see those cars show up. You have to realize that just 3 years before that all of them were sub 180hp I think. 1985 was the beginning of the return of decent muscle cars.
Originally Posted by 1ltcap
actually, 1979 was the beginning. if ford hadn't introduced the fox bodied gt, i don't think chevy would've done anything with the camaro.........and may even have discontinued it much sooner than they did..........
Well, it could've been both 1979 and 1985...or it might've even been neither LOL.
In my opinion, it was actually 1982.
That was the year that the 'modern era' Mustang GT 5.0L first came out, yes it was only 157hp with a 2 barrel carburetor but it was also light.
That was also the very first year of the 3rd gen Camaro/Firebird with their 'mighty' 145hp (carb) and 165hp (TBI) 5.0s as well.
A friend of a friend of mine had a brand new black Mustang GT back then and I clearly remember cruising around in it (had to be January/February 1982) and I had no idea what the car even was yet and certainly no knowledge of the historical significance and major influence on future fast cars (domestic and import) it would someday hold (again, in my opinion).
I truly believe that car has direct ties to what we're experiencing from GM, Ford and Chrysler/SRT today.
Old 05-21-2012, 08:29 AM
  #14  
TECH Resident
 
1ltcap's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: NJ
Posts: 812
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by LS1LT1
Well, it could've been both 1979 and 1985...or it might've even been neither LOL.
In my opinion, it was actually 1982.
That was the year that the 'modern era' Mustang GT 5.0L first came out, yes it was only 157hp with a 2 barrel carburetor but it was also light.
That was also the very first year of the 3rd gen Camaro/Firebird with their 'mighty' 145hp (carb) and 165hp (TBI) 5.0s as well.
A friend of a friend of mine had a brand new black Mustang GT back then and I clearly remember cruising around in it (had to be January/February 1982) and I had no idea what the car even was yet and certainly no knowledge of the historical significance and major influence on future fast cars (domestic and import) it would someday hold (again, in my opinion).
I truly believe that car has direct ties to what we're experiencing from GM, Ford and Chrysler/SRT today.
yea, that's why i say 79. it took them till 82 to come up with an answer to the fox body.
Old 05-21-2012, 09:22 AM
  #15  
TECH Junkie
iTrader: (33)
 
LS1-450's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 3,783
Likes: 0
Received 9 Likes on 8 Posts

Default

An example of how fortuneate the kids on this site are. They didn't have to live through the **** car years.
Old 05-21-2012, 10:27 AM
  #16  
Douchebag On The Tree
 
justin455's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Indianapolis, IN
Posts: 1,268
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by 1ltcap
yea, that's why i say 79. it took them till 82 to come up with an answer to the fox body.
I get what you're saying there, it makes sense, but I feel the Trans Am was still hanging on to the original muscle car ear until 1979. For 78-79 the Pontiac 400 was actually rated at 220hp, up from 200 for 1977.
Old 05-21-2012, 11:03 AM
  #17  
TECH Resident
 
1ltcap's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: NJ
Posts: 812
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by justin455
I get what you're saying there, it makes sense, but I feel the Trans Am was still hanging on to the original muscle car ear until 1979. For 78-79 the Pontiac 400 was actually rated at 220hp, up from 200 for 1977.
yea, they were, but they were still really nothing to write home about.....not compared to the next gen fbodys, or the fox bodys.......
Old 05-21-2012, 11:27 AM
  #18  
Douchebag On The Tree
 
justin455's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Indianapolis, IN
Posts: 1,268
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by 1ltcap
yea, they were, but they were still really nothing to write home about.....not compared to the next gen fbodys, or the fox bodys.......
That would be an opinion. While it's not that impressive, it actually becomes more impressive when you do compare the power to the other Mustangs, Camaros, Corvettes of the same time and the next few years of the next gen. Regardless, I was just pointing out that the muscle car era was still hanging on then when you said it was the beginning of the next wave.

After brushing up on my Mustang history I'm gonna agree with someone earlier posting 1982 as the revival. For 80 and 81 Ford took away the 5.0 available in 79 and replaced it with an anemic 4.2 making a whopping 120hp because of the secondary oil crisis in 79.

Last edited by justin455; 05-21-2012 at 11:33 AM.
Old 05-21-2012, 11:46 AM
  #19  
10 Second Club
iTrader: (8)
 
HioSSilver's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Winchester, VA
Posts: 5,927
Received 412 Likes on 330 Posts

Default

I don't remember ever seeing a carb'ed stock mustang in that era run a 14. The ones I was in/around I remember being turdy before FI came for them. Fox body's handled awful......what a heap of **** in the turns.....lol That thing was everywhere.

Dad has a pristine 85 IROC TPI car that he bought with only 2,000 miles and has only about 25k on it now. He never would take it to the track but it had no problems with the Mustangs of that era. It ran really good for then.
Old 05-21-2012, 12:00 PM
  #20  
TECH Junkie
iTrader: (2)
 
-Ross-'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Houston/Alvin, TX
Posts: 3,828
Received 19 Likes on 14 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by HioSSilver
I don't remember ever seeing a carb'ed stock mustang in that era run a 14. The ones I was in/around I remember being turdy before FI came for them. Fox body's handled awful......what a heap of **** in the turns.....lol That thing was everywhere.
The carb'd 85 made decent power.

I want to slap that Mustang driver. I know it's just a skit, but he was annoying as ****.


Quick Reply: Muscle Car Wars Circa 1985



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:04 PM.