Generation III Internal Engine 1997-2006 LS1 | LS6
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

Biggest valves on LS1

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 06-26-2012, 10:40 PM
  #1  
TECH Fanatic
Thread Starter
iTrader: (20)
 
FU_I_AM_UltraZ's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: New Port Richey, FL
Posts: 1,133
Received 26 Likes on 23 Posts

Default Biggest valves on LS1

Okay, Looking at a set of heads with 2.055/1.60 valves, can they be used on stock LS1 shortblock? I want to use a nice cam, so fly cutting will already be planned...
Thanks
Charlie
Old 06-27-2012, 12:09 AM
  #2  
12 Second Club
iTrader: (49)
 
bww3588's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Chillicothe/Lima, Ohio
Posts: 8,139
Received 8 Likes on 8 Posts

Default

Will be close. After you get over 2.02, it seems that any gains by going larger are negated by valve shrouding.
Old 06-27-2012, 11:53 AM
  #3  
LS1TECH & Trucks Sponsor
iTrader: (4)
 
Sales4@Texas-Speed's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 1,768
Likes: 0
Received 7 Likes on 7 Posts

Default

Like previously posted once you get over the 2.02 size you really don't see enough pick up to make it worth it. We did some flow bench testing a number of years ago on our 5.3l heads and found that a 2.04 valve actually lost midrange and posted the same top end flow results as the 2.02 valve we use in them now.
Old 06-27-2012, 12:22 PM
  #4  
TECH Senior Member
 
PREDATOR-Z's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: BFE
Posts: 14,620
Likes: 0
Received 16 Likes on 16 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by JohnJanz@Texas-Speed
Like previously posted once you get over the 2.02 size you really don't see enough pick up to make it worth it. We did some flow bench testing a number of years ago on our 5.3l heads and found that a 2.04 valve actually lost midrange and posted the same top end flow results as the 2.02 valve we use in them now.
That is because you had them on 2.02 seats.
2.055 on correct seats with proper bowl work will yield benefits over 2.02.
Ideally IMO, keeping the valve train the lightest has its benefits as well as well as a matched valve train.
Old 06-27-2012, 12:27 PM
  #5  
KCS
Moderator
iTrader: (20)
 
KCS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Conroe, TX
Posts: 8,848
Received 307 Likes on 207 Posts

Default

Will it work? Yes.

Will it work well? Probably not.
Old 06-27-2012, 07:30 PM
  #6  
LS1TECH & Trucks Sponsor
iTrader: (4)
 
Sales4@Texas-Speed's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 1,768
Likes: 0
Received 7 Likes on 7 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by PREDATOR-Z
That is because you had them on 2.02 seats.
2.055 on correct seats with proper bowl work will yield benefits over 2.02.
Ideally IMO, keeping the valve train the lightest has its benefits as well as well as a matched valve train.
Well if thats the case what benefits have you seen? It seems like you must have done the testing on this to prove that statement?
Old 06-27-2012, 08:24 PM
  #7  
KCS
Moderator
iTrader: (20)
 
KCS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Conroe, TX
Posts: 8,848
Received 307 Likes on 207 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by JohnJanz@Texas-Speed
Well if thats the case what benefits have you seen? It seems like you must have done the testing on this to prove that statement?
Try that Chris1313 guy for example. I'm pretty sure his 346 put down 520whp with 2.04" valves.

2.04" valves are only 52% of the bore on an LS1. The LS3 uses intake valves that are over 53% AND has a wider valve spacing.
Old 06-27-2012, 08:40 PM
  #8  
TECH Resident
iTrader: (5)
 
therabidweasel's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: NH/MA
Posts: 876
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Mamofied is 2.055/1.6...people seem to do just fine with Mamo's work.
Old 07-03-2012, 11:33 AM
  #9  
TECH Fanatic
Thread Starter
iTrader: (20)
 
FU_I_AM_UltraZ's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: New Port Richey, FL
Posts: 1,133
Received 26 Likes on 23 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by JohnJanz@Texas-Speed
Well if thats the case what benefits have you seen? It seems like you must have done the testing on this to prove that statement?
I was looking at your guy's heads... What combo can give me 450whp and at least 410wtq? I want reliability so i'm using stock rocker arms.
Thanks
Old 07-06-2012, 02:58 PM
  #10  
10 Second Club
iTrader: (24)
 
chrs1313's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 5,697
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by JohnJanz@Texas-Speed
Like previously posted once you get over the 2.02 size you really don't see enough pick up to make it worth it. We did some flow bench testing a number of years ago on our 5.3l heads and found that a 2.04 valve actually lost midrange and posted the same top end flow results as the 2.02 valve we use in them now.
Awww do you even know what size valves are on the car in your sig??

Stock bottom end 346 right?

Prc 227 heads with a 2.06" size intake valve???

http://www.texas-speed.com/p-1163-pr...der-heads.aspx


Last edited by chrs1313; 07-06-2012 at 03:03 PM.
Old 07-06-2012, 03:08 PM
  #11  
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (28)
 
studderin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Rochester, NY
Posts: 5,556
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes on 6 Posts

Default

dose a flow loss on a bench mean a hp loss?
Old 07-06-2012, 05:49 PM
  #12  
LS1TECH & Trucks Sponsor
iTrader: (4)
 
Sales4@Texas-Speed's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 1,768
Likes: 0
Received 7 Likes on 7 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by chrs1313
Awww do you even know what size valves are on the car in your sig??

Stock bottom end 346 right?

Prc 227 heads with a 2.06" size intake valve???

http://www.texas-speed.com/p-1163-pr...der-heads.aspx

Yes I know what valves are in those heads. This is a complete aftermarket casting head that does not have a stock valve seat. Why would we go and spend all that time and money to make an aftermarket casting and leave a stock valve seat in it?

Do you know what an aftermarket valve seat is?
Old 07-06-2012, 09:13 PM
  #13  
TECH Fanatic
 
TVWilkes's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: RainbowCity,Alabama
Posts: 1,292
Received 6 Likes on 4 Posts

Default

IMO, a 2.055 valve will work on a stock bore. This is the largest that I would use. I hae seen a 2.08 valve flow more on a flow bench. But it didn't make anymore power on the dyno. You will have to change the seat for any valve lager than a 2.04, but this has nothing to do with the bowl area. It has everything to do that the outside diameter of the valve will be on aluminum instead of steel.
Old 07-07-2012, 02:28 AM
  #14  
TECH Fanatic
Thread Starter
iTrader: (20)
 
FU_I_AM_UltraZ's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: New Port Richey, FL
Posts: 1,133
Received 26 Likes on 23 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by TVWilkes
IMO, a 2.055 valve will work on a stock bore. This is the largest that I would use. I hae seen a 2.08 valve flow more on a flow bench. But it didn't make anymore power on the dyno. You will have to change the seat for any valve lager than a 2.04, but this has nothing to do with the bowl area. It has everything to do that the outside diameter of the valve will be on aluminum instead of steel.
Thank you... that's all I wanted to know lol. Maybe I'll play it safe and stay with 2.04s or find a cheap set of prc's
Old 07-07-2012, 07:13 AM
  #15  
TECH Senior Member
 
PREDATOR-Z's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: BFE
Posts: 14,620
Likes: 0
Received 16 Likes on 16 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by studderin
dose a flow loss on a bench mean a hp loss?
LOL, you must like net-wars.
IMO No, not necessarily. Flow numbers are merely like a measuring stick (like dyno numbers). There is quite a few other factors to consider.
Old 07-07-2012, 07:38 AM
  #16  
The Scammer Hammer
iTrader: (49)
 
dr_whigham's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Lafayette, LA
Posts: 6,707
Received 20 Likes on 16 Posts

Default

I'm guessing this is where volumetric efficiency comes into play?
Old 07-07-2012, 09:06 AM
  #17  
Staging Lane
 
RQSGTO's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: MIchigan
Posts: 64
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I ran a set of ETP 5.3 (2.055 intake, 1.60 exhaust) heads on my ls1 motor with a 228/228 112 cam. Did not see much gain over the stock 241 heads, but the ETP 5.3 heads are setup for a minimum 4" bore.

What is the valve angle of the head's you are looking at?

Last edited by RQSGTO; 07-07-2012 at 11:57 AM.
Old 07-07-2012, 02:38 PM
  #18  
10 Second Club
iTrader: (24)
 
chrs1313's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 5,697
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by JohnJanz@Texas-Speed
Yes I know what valves are in those heads. This is a complete aftermarket casting head that does not have a stock valve seat. Why would we go and spend all that time and money to make an aftermarket casting and leave a stock valve seat in it?

Do you know what an aftermarket valve seat is?
No that is big shop talk...just a simple garage wrencher here...

OP just states he wanted to know about large valves, not stock castings and stock seats...your post didn't explain all options and could be read that going anything bigger than a 2.02 valve is a waste...
Old 09-15-2014, 02:04 PM
  #19  
Teching In
 
TheLSBeast's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Alice tx.
Posts: 29
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Ive got a set of 243 heads that I just had valve jobed. Im on my first ls build so when the machinist said he used 2.055 / 1.60 valves I didnt hesitate nor did I research valve size and seat combinations for these heads. So the heads were valve jobbed with the stock seats. Now I find out through major head porting companies TEA, AI, ect.... that the stock seats on the 243 wont allow any bigger than a 2.04. So im stuck with new REV valves. Im sending my heads off for cnc port so they are going to replace my intake seats and revalve job. Will the stock exhaust seat fit work with the 1.60? Ive heard you cant go bigger that a 1.575 on a stock seat.
Old 09-16-2014, 09:03 AM
  #20  
KCS
Moderator
iTrader: (20)
 
KCS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Conroe, TX
Posts: 8,848
Received 307 Likes on 207 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by TheLSBeast
Ive got a set of 243 heads that I just had valve jobed. Im on my first ls build so when the machinist said he used 2.055 / 1.60 valves I didnt hesitate nor did I research valve size and seat combinations for these heads. So the heads were valve jobbed with the stock seats. Now I find out through major head porting companies TEA, AI, ect.... that the stock seats on the 243 wont allow any bigger than a 2.04. So im stuck with new REV valves. Im sending my heads off for cnc port so they are going to replace my intake seats and revalve job. Will the stock exhaust seat fit work with the 1.60? Ive heard you cant go bigger that a 1.575 on a stock seat.
1.60" is fine, that's about the max though.


Quick Reply: Biggest valves on LS1



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:16 PM.