Generation III Internal Engine 1997-2006 LS1 | LS6
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

cam/head swap and keeping stock like driveability..

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 10-07-2012, 02:16 PM
  #1  
TECH Apprentice
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
 
TT427's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Florida
Posts: 372
Received 6 Likes on 5 Posts

Default cam/head swap and keeping stock like driveability..

How big can you go with a cam using a bump in compression to help keep the stock characteristics. I realize their are always tradeoffs, not looking to keep the same curve, but where/how would dynamic compression come into play on a stock ls1 for say a 228 or a street sweeper HT? What would be favorable specs concerning opening and closing points or LSA? Just wondering what exactly you can get away with before you actually have more of a race car that needs some gearing or a converter. Thinking of a 5.3 head swap and bigger cam. Want to eventually get gears but looking at a max of 3.73-3.90 for highway driving @ 65-70.

specs: 62,000 miles 6spd, 3.42, ram air, most free mods, SLP lt/LM1 exhaust, no intake and not tuned so far.
Old 10-07-2012, 02:25 PM
  #2  
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (2)
 
HCI2000SS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: Howell & Fenton MI
Posts: 11,145
Likes: 0
Received 15 Likes on 15 Posts
Default

Well for reference (mods in sig) I have great drivability down to around 1500 rpm. The heads and cam make for a slight finesse coming off idle, but nothing big at all. I have about 11 to 1 compression as well. The drivability is not much different than my buddy's bolt ons only LS1.
Old 10-07-2012, 02:57 PM
  #3  
TECH Apprentice
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
 
TT427's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Florida
Posts: 372
Received 6 Likes on 5 Posts

Default

Thanks for the experience, and build info. Thinking maybe the SSHT would work well for what I want and its a little smaller. By cahnce do you know the specs for your cam, was it on a 114/112/111? Do you think a taller gear would hurt it much?
Old 10-07-2012, 03:10 PM
  #4  
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (2)
 
HCI2000SS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: Howell & Fenton MI
Posts: 11,145
Likes: 0
Received 15 Likes on 15 Posts
Default

Specs are 595/598 lift, 232/234 duration, and a 112 LSA + 2

Personally, I think a taller gear is what you want. I wouldn't change my 4.10's for anything. It has great drivability and power
Old 10-07-2012, 05:16 PM
  #5  
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (35)
 
99Bluz28's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: C. V., Kalifornia
Posts: 9,705
Likes: 0
Received 11 Likes on 11 Posts
Default

A bump in compression will give you more usable TRQ and HP in the lower rpms with DD duty, but the tune is the major key to driveability. A 228/228 with a wider 114lsa will have a wider smoother power band and would work good with a bump in compression to give it back DCR it loses to a tighter 111 or 112lsa 228/228 cam, but with nicer street manners.
Also shorter gearing like a 3.90 or 4.11 should help, not hurt driveability, for one thing 6th gear will become more useable. Still I wouldn't go any larger than a 232/234 for a DD.
Old 10-07-2012, 08:32 PM
  #6  
TECH Apprentice
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
 
TT427's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Florida
Posts: 372
Received 6 Likes on 5 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by 99Bluz28
A bump in compression will give you more usable TRQ and HP in the lower rpms with DD duty, but the tune is the major key to driveability. A 228/228 with a wider 114lsa will have a wider smoother power band and would work good with a bump in compression to give it back DCR it loses to a tighter 111 or 112lsa 228/228 cam, but with nicer street manners.
Also shorter gearing like a 3.90 or 4.11 should help, not hurt driveability, for one thing 6th gear will become more useable. Still I wouldn't go any larger than a 232/234 for a DD.
Had a pretty good idea the tune really matters for how well/smooth it runs. Just wondering how big, tight can you go with little to no overlap and what comp is needed to retain factory DCR with a healthy 228-232 cam. Would like gears but 4.10 seem to make 1st useless. Do understand their is a trade off and some low speed torque could be sacrificed as gearing will bring some back. Maybe what I am asking is going to a 224 with no comp bump close to what you would have with something bigger with a comp bump and tighter lsa and no overlap?
Old 10-07-2012, 08:32 PM
  #7  
TECH Apprentice
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
 
TT427's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Florida
Posts: 372
Received 6 Likes on 5 Posts

Default

maybe I should call a cam grinder?
Old 10-07-2012, 10:58 PM
  #8  
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (35)
 
99Bluz28's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: C. V., Kalifornia
Posts: 9,705
Likes: 0
Received 11 Likes on 11 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by TT427
maybe I should call a cam grinder?
Yes, that's always a good idea.

Okay, hopefully this will make more sense to you.

With a 228/232 114lsa +4 with the heads milled down to a 64cc chamber size, or if you go with a .040" head gaskets, this will give stock DCR and have 2* of overlap. The IVC is 44 and EVO is 54.

Example:
With stock compression you would need run a 111lsa +4 to get it to stock DCR, but you would have 8* of overlap, The IVC is 41 and the EVO is 51.
Old 10-08-2012, 07:03 AM
  #9  
11 Second Club
iTrader: (1)
 
96capricemgr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 11,975
Likes: 0
Received 12 Likes on 12 Posts

Default

Do gears first, you have a .50 top OD so don't be afraid of 4.10s. A bigger cam with stock gears will not drive as well as stock.
Old 10-08-2012, 09:37 AM
  #10  
Staging Lane
 
J Glen's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Tri-Cities, TN
Posts: 85
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by TT427
maybe I should call a cam grinder?
Yes! Google search "Chris Straub Camshafts" or "custom camshafts" and you will see some of his work. He can give some good and free advise.
Old 10-08-2012, 09:56 AM
  #11  
11 Second Club
iTrader: (1)
 
96capricemgr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 11,975
Likes: 0
Received 12 Likes on 12 Posts

Default

You can technically do low duration cam on a wide LSA and not loose driveability and I am sure there are shops that would gladly sell you but you wont gain a whole lot either, do the gears first. If you are really worried about it do the 3.90s.
The gears make 6th a lot more useable and then open up your cam possibilities.
Old 10-08-2012, 10:58 AM
  #12  
TECH Apprentice
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
 
TT427's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Florida
Posts: 372
Received 6 Likes on 5 Posts

Default

Ths gears dont worry me, I have to get a tune for inspection. I would like to just do a cam and the tune to go with it. It won't be a race car, and I wont mind some low speed torque loss, as gears will happen probably the 3.73, have been researching turbo build, and have searched the TU1 and how it is a a dd
In NA usage till the turbo gets put on. Not much info for that cam in that scenario. So I have kind of decided to vo as big as I can within reason ans swap out when that time comes. when its not a dd...
Old 10-08-2012, 11:29 AM
  #13  
TECH Junkie
iTrader: (1)
 
mac62989's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: CT
Posts: 3,444
Received 27 Likes on 17 Posts

Default

Ported 241s that are high compression and a mild cam?
Old 10-08-2012, 12:56 PM
  #14  
TECH Apprentice
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
 
TT427's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Florida
Posts: 372
Received 6 Likes on 5 Posts

Default

No, if I went with the TU1, I would probably mill the 317's I have .010 and use a .040 gasket, and live with that till the turbo build. Just not sure how long till that will be, so was thinking PRC 5.3 and reasonably big cam for the money and just see how good that is, maybe enough for me? If not,
when the time comes just sell stuff and swap parts when I can do the turbo.
Old 10-08-2012, 04:00 PM
  #15  
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (12)
 
KingPin1094's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: NJ
Posts: 555
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by HCI2000SS
Specs are 595/598 lift, 232/234 duration, and a 112 LSA + 2

Personally, I think a taller gear is what you want. I wouldn't change my 4.10's for anything. It has great drivability and power
Im sorry i dont mean to jack your thread, but im curios as to the mpg you get with your mods???? im thinking about doing a full engine build H/C/I and im thinking of going with the EPS 236/248 .615"/.615" but i dont want to lose too much mpg and street manners.
Old 10-08-2012, 05:40 PM
  #16  
TECH Enthusiast
 
BigBirdLS1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Posts: 661
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

OP look at my sig. It is a 224R w/ PRC stg2.5 5.3 heads milled to 61cc with OEM thickness head gaskets. It runs 11.1 CR I get 21mpg with 80% city 20% hwy. I won't say it drives like stock because it doesn't, but it is as streetable as ANY H/C LS1 you'll ever see. I have 3.90 gear ratio and at 60mph it pulls 1500rpm.

The car surges very little say, driving through a parking lot at idle, but it is barely noticeable. Just incase you are wondering here is a cold start idle vid. This vid is my personal car.
Old 10-09-2012, 08:45 PM
  #17  
TECH Apprentice
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
 
TT427's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Florida
Posts: 372
Received 6 Likes on 5 Posts

Default

Just want to thank everyone on their input and experiences and advice.



Quick Reply: cam/head swap and keeping stock like driveability..



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:19 PM.