Forced Induction Superchargers | Turbochargers | Intercoolers

Special kind of Twin turbo

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 02-09-2013, 07:13 PM
  #1  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
gnfast87's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Posts: 11
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default Special kind of Twin turbo

Has anyone ever thought of using a smaller (60 series turbo) on the passenger bank of a 6.0L twin turbo motor and a larger say (76 series turbo) on the driver side???

I'm thinking that the 60 series would spool instantly and give tons of torque down low and once the air velocity got to the point where the big turbo kicked in you would have the best of both worlds.

I would think that with a FAST XFI system you could adjust fuel with the small turbo and then when the bigger kicked you could ramp up the fuel map.

What does everyone think?? Am I missing something??
Old 02-09-2013, 07:24 PM
  #2  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (3)
 
3.8redbird's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Corpus Christi Texas
Posts: 1,519
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

I have seen a setup like this used on a ford GT that was running at the Texas Mile. Didnt see the owner or it run so cant tell how it worked.
Old 02-09-2013, 08:09 PM
  #3  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (20)
 
Ping King's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: PA
Posts: 1,631
Likes: 0
Received 9 Likes on 8 Posts

Default

I wouldn't

There are always ways to have quick response.

1. Size the hotside correctly
2. Run a spool valve on a single (or twins if going big)
3. Compound Charge
4. 2 Step
Old 02-09-2013, 09:18 PM
  #4  
TECH Enthusiast
 
runsfromdacops's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Posts: 622
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

It would be much better to just do a compound setup where the smaller turbo feeds the bigger
Old 02-10-2013, 01:04 AM
  #5  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (9)
 
9sectruck's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: jefferson city MO
Posts: 1,173
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

I would think the back pressure would be unreal on the small turbo once the big turbo took over.
now if the turbos where joined sum how from bank to bank as the back pressure started building in the small turbo it would feed over to the big turbo keeping equal pressure on each bank
Old 02-10-2013, 05:49 AM
  #6  
TECH Apprentice
iTrader: (5)
 
tta656's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Posts: 397
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by 9sectruck
I would think the back pressure would be unreal on the small turbo once the big turbo took over.
now if the turbos where joined sum how from bank to bank as the back pressure started building in the small turbo it would feed over to the big turbo keeping equal pressure on each bank
sounds like a better idea
Old 02-10-2013, 07:19 AM
  #7  
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (3)
 
roninsonic's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: Mayport, FL
Posts: 582
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Sequential setups are factory on a few cars... Honestly, it's not worth the hassle. You'd be better off keeping it simple and going with two identical quality units spec'd for your application.
Old 02-10-2013, 08:11 AM
  #8  
Banned
 
TurboJoe@Straightline's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Posts: 203
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Very intrestin topic....Ive been looking into a compound set up for quite some time now. Its a little mind boggling, but looks doable. Ive wanted to run a 67mm turbo feeding a 88 or bigger on a 408. I see no real benifit from a set up like this over properly set up turbo combo but it does have the wow factor and sounds wild!

Im going to do it before the end of the year....
Old 02-10-2013, 08:34 AM
  #9  
TECH Apprentice
 
atomic 6's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Omaha,Ne
Posts: 311
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by 9sectruck
I would think the back pressure would be unreal on the small turbo once the big turbo took over.
now if the turbos where joined sum how from bank to bank as the back pressure started building in the small turbo it would feed over to the big turbo keeping equal pressure on each bank
Look up the porcshe 959 twin turbo diagram, they do just what the OP is talking about, setup just like you suggest.
Old 02-10-2013, 10:17 AM
  #10  
TECH Addict
iTrader: (11)
 
allout06's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Kokomo, In
Posts: 2,107
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

I work at caterpillar, and on our high altitude C-175 20 cyl 797F truck engines, we compound 6 turbos the setup is about the size of a full size truck haha...
Old 02-10-2013, 03:27 PM
  #11  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
gnfast87's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Posts: 11
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I'm just trying to find a way to make a lot of torque down low in the rpm range (say 1500-1800 rpm). I hate big 3500 rpm stall convertors.

A lot of people say its one or the other but I don't think it needs to be.
Check out this website I found that talks about parallel, sequential turbo setups. Great article!

http://www.autozine.org/technical_sc...duction_3.html
Old 02-10-2013, 04:28 PM
  #12  
TECH Addict
iTrader: (11)
 
allout06's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Kokomo, In
Posts: 2,107
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Just a set of small properly sized turbos for ur engine size.



Quick Reply: Special kind of Twin turbo



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:00 PM.