Generation III External Engine LS1 | LS6 | Bolt-Ons | Intakes | Exhaust | Ignition | Accessories
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

Stock, FAST 92, or FAST 102???

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 09-09-2013, 08:17 AM
  #1  
TECH Enthusiast
Thread Starter
 
DemonicZ's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Reno,NV
Posts: 658
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default Stock, FAST 92, or FAST 102???

For stock displacement 346 with AFR 215 Mongoose heads, Tick stage 3 turbo cam, D-1SC 8 rib upgrade
Old 09-09-2013, 11:23 AM
  #2  
TECH Fanatic
 
2000PewterT/A's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Posts: 1,074
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

92 or 102, depends on how much you want to spend etc.
Old 09-09-2013, 12:16 PM
  #3  
10 Second Club
iTrader: (14)
 
Detoxx03's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Woodward Avenue
Posts: 7,336
Received 72 Likes on 37 Posts

Default

92 ported is what I would go with.
Old 09-09-2013, 07:05 PM
  #4  
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (28)
 
studderin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Rochester, NY
Posts: 5,556
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes on 6 Posts

Default

more hp more money
left to right.
porting add 3-600
Old 09-09-2013, 07:27 PM
  #5  
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (2)
 
HCI2000SS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: Howell & Fenton MI
Posts: 11,145
Likes: 0
Received 15 Likes on 15 Posts
Default

If it were me i'd just do the 92 and have it ported
Old 09-10-2013, 07:05 PM
  #6  
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (8)
 
Blackpanther99's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: Baytown, TX
Posts: 6,963
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts

Default

Ported 92.
Old 09-11-2013, 08:36 AM
  #7  
TECH Addict
iTrader: (6)
 
badazz81z28's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 2,389
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts

Default

I have a FAST 102 on my 346 and no complaints here. From my research a ported 92 performs the same as a stock 102. I think Tony Mamo also has a thread explaining why the FAST 102 is superior and dybo graphs to show the increased power over the other intakes.
Old 09-11-2013, 10:45 PM
  #8  
TECH Enthusiast
Thread Starter
 
DemonicZ's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Reno,NV
Posts: 658
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I heard back from Martin @tick... and he recommended a LS6 intake, with 225CC PRC as cast heads with a custom spec'd cam. Will also be running the
D-1SC with 8 rib upgrade TSP 1 7/8s LTs and TSP bullet rumbler true dual. I'm hoping for 550rwhp+

Last edited by DemonicZ; 09-13-2013 at 11:22 AM.
Old 09-15-2013, 03:06 AM
  #9  
FormerVendor
iTrader: (3)
 
Sales@Tick's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Mount Airy, NC
Posts: 7,480
Likes: 0
Received 15 Likes on 10 Posts
Default

As I mentioned over the phone, IMO there is no point in a Fast intake on a boosted car. A single plane like a Super Victor, Holley Hi-Ram, Pro Flo etc. I could justify telling a customer to spend their hard earned money on, but not a Fast intake on a boosted car.

Come on guys!



Quick Reply: Stock, FAST 92, or FAST 102???



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:57 PM.