Forced Induction Superchargers | Turbochargers | Intercoolers

Would you or would you not?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 10-12-2013, 08:56 PM
  #1  
Launching!
Thread Starter
iTrader: (2)
 
SPOOLED UP's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: STL
Posts: 275
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default Would you or would you not?

Run a 5.3 engine with ported 5.3 heads milled to 59.5cc with a tu1 cam and 20+lbs boost on ls9 head gaskets?
Old 10-12-2013, 09:29 PM
  #2  
TECH Addict
iTrader: (88)
 
Burken01's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Anaheim, Ca
Posts: 2,923
Likes: 0
Received 13 Likes on 12 Posts

Default

59cc will put you in very high CR, E85 territory
Old 10-12-2013, 09:40 PM
  #3  
TECH Regular
iTrader: (4)
 
Fondle's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: ATX
Posts: 414
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

yea what he said, too much CR
Old 10-12-2013, 09:56 PM
  #4  
TECH Regular
 
AutoRoc's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 411
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

ONLY if you want to make 900HP...

15 PSI should put you near 800.
Old 10-12-2013, 10:51 PM
  #5  
TECH Veteran
iTrader: (246)
 
robsquikz28's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Chicago/Crown point
Posts: 4,987
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Stock heads are what 61cc?
With a 9.5 CR
so down 2 points should make about 9.8 cR correct?
Hell many tuners want 10:1 or 10:4 CR for big boost especially if using e85 or 110 octane
Old 10-14-2013, 04:50 PM
  #6  
TECH Addict
iTrader: (18)
 
Beatdown Z's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Newark, DE
Posts: 2,148
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

And don't forget the LS9 gaskets will lower the compression a little. Maybe a tenth, so you'd be at 9.7:1 CR. Not bad at all.

Run it and let us know what happens. Plenty of people have done it before...
Old 10-18-2013, 09:18 PM
  #7  
Launching!
Thread Starter
iTrader: (2)
 
SPOOLED UP's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: STL
Posts: 275
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

So what would the compression be with the ls9 head gaskets?

How bout ls7 head gaskets?

Stock 6.0 head gaskets?
Old 10-19-2013, 11:01 AM
  #8  
8 Second Club
iTrader: (14)
 
samdogmx's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Alton, IL
Posts: 747
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

stop guessing & put your info into a CR calculator

http://www.csgnetwork.com/compcalc.html
Old 10-19-2013, 11:03 AM
  #9  
8 Second Club
iTrader: (14)
 
samdogmx's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Alton, IL
Posts: 747
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

oh & yes I would do it
Old 10-19-2013, 02:06 PM
  #10  
TECH Addict
iTrader: (28)
 
slowlsx's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Deer park
Posts: 2,258
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

I dont run anything less than 10.0:1 but I run meth. That suoer low compression stuff is old school, more power you maie NA the more power youll make per pound and the easier it is to bring the turbo in. As long as timing is not cazy. I would look into the TU0 though but then again you d8dnt list what turbo your running.
Old 10-19-2013, 02:52 PM
  #11  
Launching!
Thread Starter
iTrader: (2)
 
SPOOLED UP's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: STL
Posts: 275
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

IDK the bore stroke on a stock 6.0 let alone the exact specs of the 5.3 heads

Also the tu1 cam is what and leaning towards a t4 76 or 80mm turbo
Old 10-19-2013, 04:36 PM
  #12  
TECH Resident
 
HRHohio's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Las Vegas, NV
Posts: 916
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by SPOOLED UP
IDK the bore stroke on a stock 6.0 let alone the exact specs of the 5.3 heads
Seriously?

Dude, do a search. The internet is your friend.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/GM_Vortec_engine

Every spec you can imagine is out there... just ask a search engine...

http://letmegooglethat.com/?q=5.3+heads+spec

See?

Last edited by HRHohio; 10-19-2013 at 09:49 PM.
Old 10-19-2013, 07:12 PM
  #13  
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (8)
 
Blackpanther99's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: Baytown, TX
Posts: 6,963
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts

Default

Shoot, id do it on E85. Give it a shot!
Old 10-19-2013, 09:50 PM
  #14  
Launching!
Thread Starter
iTrader: (2)
 
SPOOLED UP's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: STL
Posts: 275
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

So when I input specs I get more CR than stock

3.78 bore
3.622 stroke
4.100 bore head gasket
.051 head gasket thickness
59cc heads
-6.0 dome
.008 deck height
give me like 10.6

But If I dont use a negative input like it says then im at 9.36
Old 10-20-2013, 12:01 AM
  #15  
TECH Addict
iTrader: (88)
 
Burken01's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Anaheim, Ca
Posts: 2,923
Likes: 0
Received 13 Likes on 12 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by SPOOLED UP
So when I input specs I get more CR than stock

3.78 bore
3.622 stroke
4.100 bore head gasket
.051 head gasket thickness
59cc heads
-6.0 dome
.008 deck height
give me like 10.6

But If I dont use a negative input like it says then im at 9.36
Some CR calculators say to use a positive number for negative cc...

You have to read the fine print
Old 10-20-2013, 10:25 AM
  #16  
TECH Veteran
iTrader: (246)
 
robsquikz28's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Chicago/Crown point
Posts: 4,987
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

9.36 sounds good to me for a turbo build.
That CC is kind of low but not much lower than stock being 61.15 and people are pushing well over 20 lbs on those stock 706 heads.
Just get a solid tune, high octane gas or e85
Old 10-20-2013, 12:23 PM
  #17  
TECH Veteran
iTrader: (11)
 
87silverbullet's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Slidell,LA
Posts: 4,873
Likes: 0
Received 8 Likes on 7 Posts

Default

I wouldn't hesitate to throw 20lbs at that. 9.3:1 is good for a pump gas and meth setup

Using your numbers, with a 0 deck height I get 9.76:1. You say your piston is sticking out 0.08 above the deck, did you measure that? I ask because then your compression jumps to 11.86:1. If I go the other way and you piston is 0.08 in the hole I get 8.34:1

Check over your specs to be sure that's what you have for your measurements.

Last edited by 87silverbullet; 10-20-2013 at 12:34 PM.
Old 10-20-2013, 01:35 PM
  #18  
Teching In
 
ZonJuice's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: laconia, IN
Posts: 31
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by 87silverbullet
I wouldn't hesitate to throw 20lbs at that. 9.3:1 is good for a pump gas and meth setup

Using your numbers, with a 0 deck height I get 9.76:1. You say your piston is sticking out 0.08 above the deck, did you measure that? I ask because then your compression jumps to 11.86:1. If I go the other way and you piston is 0.08 in the hole I get 8.34:1

Check over your specs to be sure that's what you have for your measurements.
.008 not .080
Old 10-20-2013, 02:01 PM
  #19  
TECH Veteran
iTrader: (11)
 
87silverbullet's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Slidell,LA
Posts: 4,873
Likes: 0
Received 8 Likes on 7 Posts

Default

Stupid me Didn't pay attention to that 1 little zero

Now i get 9.59:1 with it .008 in the hole and 9.93:1 with it .008 out of the hole
Old 10-20-2013, 02:07 PM
  #20  
8 Second Club
iTrader: (3)
 
3pedals's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: WPG MB
Posts: 1,931
Received 6 Likes on 5 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by SPOOLED UP
IDK the bore stroke on a stock 6.0 let alone the exact specs of the 5.3 heads

Also the tu1 cam is what and leaning towards a t4 76 or 80mm turbo
what is the bottom end, 5.3 or 6.0?
I think compression is too high if its a 6.0, but it will be fine on a 5.3


Quick Reply: Would you or would you not?



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:59 AM.