Generation III Internal Engine 1997-2006 LS1 | LS6
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

Hot Rod mags "worlds most extreme ls1s"

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 05-17-2004, 07:00 PM
  #1  
myZ
Staging Lane
Thread Starter
 
myZ's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: CA
Posts: 65
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Lightbulb Hot Rod mags "worlds most extreme ls1s"

I only got 4 posts when doing a search for the lingenfelter gt1 cam. Any way I know this artical is about 2-3months old now but i have to ask. In hot rods the "worlds fastest" h/c ls1 was like a 10.5 in the quarter (cant remember mph), with a 4l60e and the gt1 cam 218/229 113 w/ls6 springs(thats gotta be hella streetable...and i believe lpe recommends those springs too) along with lingenfelters stage2 ls6 ported heads...which are actually priced pretty good for having a name brand like "lingenfelter". Anywhy the owner didnt completly gut it...if i remember still over 3200 lbs with a 4l60e not a th350etc. Then just bolt ons like headers to top the motor off and i believe thats pretty much it. I know his suspension had to hook up well but i think these mods would make a hell of a street machine...then an ati procharger Well what do you guys think about this combination? I would love to run this combo on the street ! I remember the owner of the car telling hot rod how everyone would ask him how the car runs off the bottle....and then tell them it's na and watch there faces for reactions. hopefully i'll start a discussion because this combo looks tame compared to some other setups i've seen on ls1tech and seems to run almost too good, all with ls6 springs! Any one have this setup/cam to chime in as well....because so far i think i may have found the h/c package to go with!!!
Old 05-17-2004, 08:29 PM
  #2  
TECH Fanatic
 
granitemonkey's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Richmond,Va
Posts: 1,124
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Isnt it a red WS6??
Old 05-18-2004, 02:24 AM
  #3  
z98
TECH Fanatic
 
z98's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Posts: 1,839
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Plenty of other H/C setups would run that number in that car.

Don't get too caught up in magazine numbers.

Look around here and see what 50 guys are doing with a particular setup before you make up your mind.
Old 05-18-2004, 04:09 AM
  #4  
11 Second Club
iTrader: (1)
 
AL SS590 M6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Charlotte, MI
Posts: 316
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by z98
Plenty of other H/C setups would run that number in that car.

Don't get too caught up in magazine numbers.

Look around here and see what 50 guys are doing with a particular setup before you make up your mind.
It's a red 2000 Formula RUQUIKER on this board. And the 3200 is race weight. That means that the car is around 3000lbs.
Old 05-18-2004, 07:34 AM
  #5  
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (6)
 
WILWAXU's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: League City, TX
Posts: 14,378
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

https://ls1tech.com/forums/automotive-news-media-press/141177-ls1tech-april-hot-rod.html
Old 05-18-2004, 12:53 PM
  #6  
Staging Lane
iTrader: (3)
 
Slow LT1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Posts: 53
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by z98
Plenty of other H/C setups would run that number in that car.

Don't get too caught up in magazine numbers.

Look around here and see what 50 guys are doing with a particular setup before you make up your mind.
They're not "magazine numbers." It's what someone (a boardmember) actually ran in his car. The magazine just featured his car.
Old 05-18-2004, 01:52 PM
  #7  
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (10)
 
94form2000z's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Arlington, TX Congestion City
Posts: 720
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

Sweet. But with a 3200 race weight I'm sure alot of setups will run that number.
Old 05-18-2004, 02:05 PM
  #8  
z98
TECH Fanatic
 
z98's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Posts: 1,839
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I'm aware of how they got the information on ALL THE CARS IN THE ARTICLE.

They're not "magazine numbers." It's what someone (a boardmember) actually ran in his car. The magazine just featured his car
Well, since you're so smart...

Why did the magazine choose that particular car?

Because it was the fastest H/C car. Period.

That means that every other person who has ever put a H/C on a car and taken it to the track has ran SLOWER.

Hence, my suggestion to check out more setups before commiting to one based on what one car is running.
Old 05-18-2004, 02:18 PM
  #9  
LS1Tech Co-Founder
iTrader: (34)
 
Pro Stock John's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Chicago, IL
Posts: 44,659
Received 1,099 Likes on 721 Posts

Default

I helped validate the times for all of the entries, and the article references me on the first page. Those are real times 100%.

John Ryan
Old 05-18-2004, 02:35 PM
  #10  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (1)
 
FEAR THE LS1's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Hot Rainy Humid +2000 DA South Florida
Posts: 1,396
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

Hot Rod mags "worlds most extreme ls1s"
What till they get a load of my new motor.



Heck wait till ya'll see my entire new setup..

Sneak Peak:


Lee
Old 05-18-2004, 02:41 PM
  #11  
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (2)
 
gator's 99TA's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Tampa Bay
Posts: 9,971
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts

Default

holy cow lee! is that your paint?!?!?! looks awesome!!!
Old 05-18-2004, 02:46 PM
  #12  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (1)
 
FEAR THE LS1's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Hot Rainy Humid +2000 DA South Florida
Posts: 1,396
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

Yea I started with the new paint scheme this past weekend. I'm not done yet, I still need to finish up a few details then wet sand and buff her up. I did the paint myself with a friend.

I'll post more pics when she's done =)
Old 05-18-2004, 02:48 PM
  #13  
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (2)
 
gator's 99TA's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Tampa Bay
Posts: 9,971
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts

Default

please do, it looks great so far!
Old 05-18-2004, 05:04 PM
  #14  
myZ
Staging Lane
Thread Starter
 
myZ's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: CA
Posts: 65
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

That means that every other person who has ever put a H/C on a car and taken it to the track has ran SLOWER.
Thats why I want to know if any one has this setup or at least the same cam....I mean, come on ls6 springs....the ever popular 224/224 runs more hi-po springs and it gets beat by this h/c package (not to mention hot rod said it "may" be able to pass cali smog...not that it needs to in my case in minnesota, but i'm just pointing out its relativly small size and nuts performance). To me it seems more tame that the gm hot cam and runs like a raped ape...the cam is $299 from lingenfelter. Back to the quote....anyone?
Old 05-18-2004, 05:12 PM
  #15  
myZ
Staging Lane
Thread Starter
 
myZ's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: CA
Posts: 65
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Also thanks for posting the link to the other discussion like this ..i'll try to talk to the owner about how it runs on the street...if he does,and more specifics..i'm not out to try and run the same combo on the strip against him but just turn some respectable times at a fun day or domestic vs. import night (hoping for mid11's) and lay the smack down on the street if need be!!! all with out a 224/224 w/918's Thanks for the replies so far!!!
Old 05-18-2004, 09:25 PM
  #16  
TECH Addict
 
The Guy in MY 99TA's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Magee MS
Posts: 2,950
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

I beleieve there have been a couple stock displacement cars go 10.50's.. which I say stock displacement because they had pistons and rods which really don't benefit any b/c the pistons are actually lighter but aftermarket rods usually make up for the piston weight loss.

Josh S.
Old 05-19-2004, 01:56 AM
  #17  
I can shift faster than you.
iTrader: (21)
 
Jason99T/A's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Baton Rouge, LA
Posts: 5,133
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Lee, the car looks great!!!
Old 05-19-2004, 02:19 AM
  #18  
Staging Lane
 
Seifer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Austin/Westlake
Posts: 91
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

i would say its the converter making that car as fast as it is.. not the weak heads/cam, thats also a really light weight car. my race weight is about 400lb heavier.
Old 05-19-2004, 08:45 AM
  #19  
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (10)
 
94form2000z's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Arlington, TX Congestion City
Posts: 720
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

It's obvious the times are due to the weight. Not taking anything away as far as kudo's go. Point is that same vehicle with a larger cam and such would run even faster! But yeah you want ***** your car out to that weight then you can run that time with that little setup.
Old 05-19-2004, 02:35 PM
  #20  
TECH Veteran
iTrader: (1)
 
CamaroCain's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Houston,TX
Posts: 4,167
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Ya'll also need to realize that the times posted in the magazines are these vehicle's quikest times they have ran, 3131 race weight, 2935 car weight(alot removed, a/c, abs, light weight brakes, light weight suspension etc were used on this car) the times mentioned were their QUICKEST. that means they had outstanding weather, they didnt post what they ran on a normal day, believe me.

Clint



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:02 AM.