Forced Induction Superchargers | Turbochargers | Intercoolers

Manifold vs Log vs Header?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 06-13-2014, 11:02 PM
  #1  
TECH Resident
Thread Starter
iTrader: (13)
 
6togo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Harford co. MD
Posts: 821
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default Manifold vs Log vs Header?

So here is a question when comparing all the different types of exhausts say with a well built TT 427 that will make a easy 1kwhp if cranked up how much difference in power are we talking between the mani's, logs, and tube headers?
I have some SS tube up and forward headers but dont think they will clear so i been thinking of building Twin logs and the benifit is they will hold the turbo's well being they are thicker unlike the thinner headers i just dont want the motor to suffer that bad even mani's make great power just worried about cracking holding turbo's.
Old 06-13-2014, 11:55 PM
  #2  
12 Second Club
iTrader: (91)
 
MUSTANGBRKR02's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Maine
Posts: 4,599
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 4 Posts

Default

Just make a brace to the engine. I figure if you are building a 427 then why skimp on headers lol. I know I didn't I got the Stainless Works ones.
Old 06-14-2014, 01:29 PM
  #3  
TECH Resident
Thread Starter
iTrader: (13)
 
6togo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Harford co. MD
Posts: 821
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I like the SW headers but they stick forward to far the ones i have are even with the head so i have more room to package the turbos and if i were to make logs i could keep them real compact. I think if they are swept correctly they will flow better than mani's but maybe not as well as headers but i think really it's a very small amount of power were talking about and probably above a certain Rpm which i dont plan on spinning past 7K.
Old 06-14-2014, 05:33 PM
  #4  
8 Second Club
iTrader: (14)
 
samdogmx's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Alton, IL
Posts: 747
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

IMO its hard to beat factory manifolds.
Old 06-15-2014, 10:29 PM
  #5  
FormerVendor
 
Chris@CBR's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Posts: 547
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by samdogmx
IMO its hard to beat factory manifolds.
Listen to this guy. If you can use stock manifolds then use them and spend your time and money in other places.

I have a twin kit with Log Manifolds that made 1026 RWHP this weekend at only 16.7psi. That motor is only 378 CID.
Old 06-16-2014, 01:23 AM
  #6  
Teching In
 
Mel Carlson's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Posts: 47
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Chris@CBR
Listen to this guy. If you can use stock manifolds then use them and spend your time and money in other places.

I have a twin kit with Log Manifolds that made 1026 RWHP this weekend at only 16.7psi. That motor is only 378 CID.
Hey what turbos were you running?
Old 06-16-2014, 01:44 AM
  #7  
12 Second Club
iTrader: (91)
 
MUSTANGBRKR02's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Maine
Posts: 4,599
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 4 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Mel Carlson
Hey what turbos were you running?
https://ls1tech.com/forums/forced-in...eo-inside.html
Old 06-16-2014, 07:08 AM
  #8  
TECH Resident
Thread Starter
iTrader: (13)
 
6togo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Harford co. MD
Posts: 821
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I know factory manifolds work just dont know if they would work on ported Mast ls7 heads and clearly logs make power to by your statement!

Originally Posted by Chris@CBR
Listen to this guy. If you can use stock manifolds then use them and spend your time and money in other places.

I have a twin kit with Log Manifolds that made 1026 RWHP this weekend at only 16.7psi. That motor is only 378 CID.
Old 06-16-2014, 08:38 AM
  #9  
FormerVendor
 
Chris@CBR's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Posts: 547
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by Mel Carlson
Hey what turbos were you running?
61mm "cast NOT billet" Compressor wheel and 65mm Turbine wheel AKA "P trim" with .63 A/R
Old 06-16-2014, 08:44 AM
  #10  
FormerVendor
 
Chris@CBR's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Posts: 547
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by 6togo
I know factory manifolds work just dont know if they would work on ported Mast ls7 heads and clearly logs make power to by your statement!
If the money is not the issue put headers on it.
A little port matching and stock manifold may work out for you.
Old 06-16-2014, 08:01 PM
  #11  
TECH Resident
Thread Starter
iTrader: (13)
 
6togo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Harford co. MD
Posts: 821
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I'm going to hang on until the motor is sitting in the frame and try the headers i have before i jump the gun i just wish they were 1 7/8" instead of 1 3/4" primary's even though i dont think it will matter much being boosted!
Old 06-17-2014, 01:17 AM
  #12  
TECH Apprentice
 
Bazman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: New Zealand
Posts: 332
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts

Default

I recall seeing an import article once on Honda engines that gained 10% by using race quality well designed headers into merge collectors, much like Tom Nelson does on most of his twin turbo packages.

There's no doubt if maximum power is the goal, race headers still have the edge, not sure if it'd be 10% gain on a big engine.

On the other hand, what works in all out race does not mean it is best for all combo's. There are some on this site that will swear that at lower boost pressures stock manifolds and smaller exhausts run quicker than headers.

I'm not convinced stock exhausts are ever better than proper headers, but I could be wrong about that, and can't argue if someone has tried both and proved this in their combination.

I am convinced that stock will spool earlier than a high volume exhaust like headers, but that is not always a consideration if headers still spool quick enough. Logic would say stock will boost at lower rpms but should cost some top end, but logic and experience can differ lol

Clearly both options or a decent log will all get you to 1000rwhp
Old 06-17-2014, 07:02 AM
  #13  
TECH Resident
Thread Starter
iTrader: (13)
 
6togo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Harford co. MD
Posts: 821
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I think headers will provide better scavaging that a log or stock manifolds that should keep it in boost better plus if i use the headers i have they are not huge so they should help also in the spool dept!
Old 06-17-2014, 07:32 AM
  #14  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (11)
 
Exidous's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Under a rock
Posts: 1,747
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts

Default

Scavenging is a non issue with turbo headers. It is purely about heat transfer and exhaust gas velocity. A 2" crossover pipe can handle upwards of 1000hp. This is why iron manifolds do so well. They retain heat and keep velocity up. Going to a header is not needed until a 2.5" crossover is not enough and a 2.5" crossover will flow a TON. 1500whp+.

The only reason to go to a header under 1000whp is looks and/or fitment. This doesn't mean you should use just any manifold. The ones with the smoothest transitions and merges would be ideal.
Old 06-17-2014, 08:31 AM
  #15  
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (8)
 
Blackpanther99's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: Baytown, TX
Posts: 6,963
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts

Default

Stock manifolds have been proven over and over. Flipped Truck manifolds will do.
Old 06-18-2014, 09:36 AM
  #16  
TECH Addict
 
chuntington101's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 2,866
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts

Default

Headers are the optimum solution as you can design them to your requirements including size, shape, length and most importantly where the turbo sits! Ever single high end race car (and not just drag racers) car I have seen all use headers. With decent support most last years to!

Cast manifold are great for a cheap solution that will work. They are strong and easy to work with. Are they the BEST solution? No but they are adequate for 99% of people.

As for performance a designed header (not just mocked up) will out perform a OEM cast manifold any day and in any area you want it to! The advantage is you can design it to do what you want. Want fast spool use a smaller header, want top end go larger. You can even fine tune the pulse length to give you performance were you want it.



Quick Reply: Manifold vs Log vs Header?



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:59 PM.