Forced Induction Superchargers | Turbochargers | Intercoolers

Phamspeed install after 8 months of waiting

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 01-01-2006, 05:54 PM
  #1  
Teching In
Thread Starter
 
REDTURBOSS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 35
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default Phamspeed install after 8 months of waiting

I am finally installing the kit after 8 months of waiting, I am in the process of installing the heads and cam, and will then move on to turbo....I think this kit might be to much for me in terms of power I might go D1sc supercharger if I can get a deal before I am done with the H/C install will see...some pics for u guys.....


[url]http://www.cardomain.com/ride/221

Last edited by REDTURBOSS; 01-02-2006 at 05:29 AM.
Old 01-01-2006, 08:59 PM
  #2  
TECH Addict
 
2002 Trans Am's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Waldwick, NJ
Posts: 2,418
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

hmmmmm......good luck is all I can say

oh yeah bad link btw
Old 01-01-2006, 10:05 PM
  #3  
FormerVendor
iTrader: (45)
 
Frost's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Richmond VA
Posts: 5,913
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Are 42lb injectors enough for H/C + 9 psi?
Old 01-02-2006, 12:47 AM
  #4  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (1)
 
mdhmi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Detroit, MI
Posts: 1,119
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

Depends on the turbo kit and supporting hardware. I maxed out my 42 # injectors right away with my turbo setup and had to upgrade to 60 #'ers.

Mark
Old 01-02-2006, 02:13 AM
  #5  
Staging Lane
 
WideOpenThrottle's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Crestview, FL
Posts: 53
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

60's would be much better to start off with. Less hassle in the long run.
Old 01-02-2006, 02:34 AM
  #6  
Restricted User
iTrader: (9)
 
NOSjohn's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 2,692
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Wait, is it a Pham kit of Groundzero kit? I'm so confused with these kits popping out of the woodwork ! I'm glad I can build a turbo system myself.
Old 01-02-2006, 03:30 AM
  #7  
Teching In
Thread Starter
 
REDTURBOSS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 35
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

link should work know
Old 01-02-2006, 04:28 AM
  #8  
EPP
FormerVendor
iTrader: (22)
 
EPP's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Posts: 13,063
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Unless you have forged rods and pistons, I wouldn't add forced induction on top of having added heads and a cam. The only way to keep if alive is to keep the boost down, along with a good tune. Bob
Old 01-02-2006, 05:17 AM
  #9  
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (48)
 
smokinHawk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Columbus, ohio
Posts: 7,354
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

Originally Posted by Exotic Performance Plus
Unless you have forged rods and pistons, I wouldn't add forced induction on top of having added heads and a cam. The only way to keep if alive is to keep the boost down, along with a good tune. Bob
hmm, i know someone that had heads, cam turbo kit and a good tune that ran pretty well, hit nines on the stock bottom end. He also had 42lb injectors.
Old 01-02-2006, 05:31 AM
  #10  
Teching In
Thread Starter
 
REDTURBOSS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 35
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

im getting somewhat scared know, what would be the max boost I could run with the lq9 heads and the cam on my sig. I always thought 9lbs was okay on the stock bottom end.
Old 01-02-2006, 05:43 AM
  #11  
EPP
FormerVendor
iTrader: (22)
 
EPP's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Posts: 13,063
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Question

Originally Posted by smokinHawk
hmm, i know someone that had heads, cam turbo kit and a good tune that ran pretty well, hit nines on the stock bottom end. He also had 42lb injectors.
There's always someone who gets by but as a general rule I don't advise it. That would be like saying, since I know one person got by, everyone else won't have any problems. Heck, my own 120,000+ Z28 stock internals survived quite a while at 15 lbs of boost. Bob
Old 01-02-2006, 05:49 AM
  #12  
EPP
FormerVendor
iTrader: (22)
 
EPP's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Posts: 13,063
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Smile

Originally Posted by REDTURBOSS
im getting somewhat scared know, what would be the max boost I could run with the lq9 heads and the cam on my sig. I always thought 9lbs was okay on the stock bottom end.
I'd shoot for 6lbs of boost, unless you can afford to pay out for a forged bottom end in the event you need to. Bob
Old 01-02-2006, 07:26 AM
  #13  
LS1Tech Sponsor
iTrader: (12)
 
Slowhawk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Bridgewater,Ma
Posts: 14,865
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes on 6 Posts

Default

Do it by HP ,not boost level. I'd say 550-600rwhp with a safe(rich-low timing) Tune
Old 01-02-2006, 10:16 AM
  #14  
10 Second Club
iTrader: (26)
 
ddnspider's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: FL
Posts: 14,597
Received 1,736 Likes on 1,297 Posts

Default

wow thats a rather large turbo cam.You didnt mention if the heads were stock or ported.Id also shoot for 550rwhp until you save the cash to get a forged bottom end.Thats still plenty for the street and a relatively stock car.Id also recommend selling the 42# injectors before you use them so theyre still new and get 60#ers.
Old 01-02-2006, 10:22 AM
  #15  
TECH Resident
iTrader: (6)
 
GrahamHill's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: northeast Miss.
Posts: 821
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by smokinHawk
hmm, i know someone that had heads, cam turbo kit and a good tune that ran pretty well, hit nines on the stock bottom end. He also had 42lb injectors.
How many hard runs?
Old 01-02-2006, 11:16 AM
  #16  
TECH Resident
iTrader: (43)
 
TwnTrboCE's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Dayton, OH
Posts: 920
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by GrahamHill
How many hard runs?
He's talking about my old setup. oringed 5.7 ported heads, cam, stock head bolts. On a 100% stock bottom end. 12psi max boost. Ran it all season many many times. Plus street driving. When we tore it down it was in perfect condition. Went a best of 9.85 @ 138 mph. @ 3450 race weight. I think it is still the fastest/quickest FI stock bottom.
Don't try this at home.
Old 01-02-2006, 05:24 PM
  #17  
Teching In
iTrader: (8)
 
TTSSZ's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Posts: 727
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

Originally Posted by TwnTrboCE
He's talking about my old setup. oringed 5.7 ported heads, cam, stock head bolts. On a 100% stock bottom end. 12psi max boost. Ran it all season many many times. Plus street driving. When we tore it down it was in perfect condition. Went a best of 9.85 @ 138 mph. @ 3450 race weight. I think it is still the fastest/quickest FI stock bottom.
Don't try this at home.

You can try it, but not unless you know what your doing.......
I don't so........

But I've done 10,000mi on my stock bottom end at 8lbs, It has lq9 st. 2 heads, a mild boost cam and a very good fuel system with 50lb inj's.
Seems safe for now, I'm in the 575rwhp range.

And thanks TwnTrboCE, you the one who got me started with my first TT kit. Been loving life ever since! Then I sold it to cablebandit and traded up to another with 37's.
Old 01-03-2006, 04:10 AM
  #18  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (1)
 
mdhmi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Detroit, MI
Posts: 1,119
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

Originally Posted by Slowhawk
Do it by HP ,not boost level. I'd say 550-600rwhp with a safe(rich-low timing) Tune
Exactly. I decided to run a little more boost (10.5 lbs) and a low AFR with little timing. 600 rwhp and the stock bottom end is running great (car has LPE GT2-3 cam and worked over LS1 heads). I could make the same power with less boost, but the tune wouldn't be as safe. In short - don't get hung up on the amount of boost. Focus on the hp level.

Mark




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:45 AM.