Post TR230/224 111 track times.....
#3
11 Second Club
iTrader: (27)
Join Date: May 2002
Location: East Palestine, OH - USA
Posts: 2,397
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
12.6@112 with 2800 converter and 2.73 gears, 12.000@114 with 4000 converter and 3.42 gears.
Edit, here's the dyno graph: https://ls1tech.com/forums/dynamometer-results-comparisons/476349-tr230-224-a4-dyno.html
Edit, here's the dyno graph: https://ls1tech.com/forums/dynamometer-results-comparisons/476349-tr230-224-a4-dyno.html
#4
TECH Addict
iTrader: (1)
Originally Posted by gillbot
12.6@112 with 2800 converter and 2.73 gears, 12.000@114 with 4000 converter and 3.42 gears.
Edit, here's the dyno graph: https://ls1tech.com/forums/showthread.php?t=476349
Edit, here's the dyno graph: https://ls1tech.com/forums/showthread.php?t=476349
#5
#6
11 Second Club
iTrader: (27)
Join Date: May 2002
Location: East Palestine, OH - USA
Posts: 2,397
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by Wicked_Hugger99
What were the conditions like when you ran the 12.0@114mph and what tires were you running? DA? I know there are several factors that come into play but just wondering cuz i figured you'd trap a lil higher w/ 399rwhp. (Not dissing, just curious) Did you data log it during the run?
I don't know the DA but the run was made on old worn out nittos and I could feel the spin from the launch. Unfortunately the worn out nittos are all I have right now so they'll have to do. The car has trapped as high as 117 before but these are my first few passes with the new converter and gears so I'm still working on the launch.
Trending Topics
#8
Registered User
iTrader: (15)
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: BTR, La
Posts: 1,363
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by steveo346
WELL I FINALLY PUT IN MY TR230/224 BUT ON A 110LSA
HERES THE LINK
http://media.putfile.com/1999-camaro-ss-TR230224-cam
HERES THE LINK
http://media.putfile.com/1999-camaro-ss-TR230224-cam
Ben T.
#9
Registered User
iTrader: (15)
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: BTR, La
Posts: 1,363
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by VIPRETR2
Mine ran real hard...
1/4
https://ls1tech.com/forums/showthread.php?t=417806
Dyno
https://ls1tech.com/forums/showthread.php?t=423609
1/4
https://ls1tech.com/forums/showthread.php?t=417806
Dyno
https://ls1tech.com/forums/showthread.php?t=423609
Thanks for the info,
Ben T.
#10
Originally Posted by Studytime
What race weight were you at? MPH looks real good, what heads were you running?
Thanks for the info,
Ben T.
Thanks for the info,
Ben T.
#12
Registered User
iTrader: (15)
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: BTR, La
Posts: 1,363
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by steveo346
WELL I FINALLY PUT IN MY TR230/224 BUT ON A 110LSA
HERES THE LINK
http://media.putfile.com/1999-camaro-ss-TR230224-cam
HERES THE LINK
http://media.putfile.com/1999-camaro-ss-TR230224-cam
Originally Posted by steveo346
It Was Off Of The Shelf From Thunder Racing.....studytime
Not to be rude, but the exact LSA is a little wider than 110 degrees. Instead of just picking a few lobes from a spreadsheet and then picking a LSA at random, TR designed this cam based on valve events and let the LSA be what it was. It actually worked out to around ~111 degrees. For this cam, unlike many others, LSA was a dependent variable based on valve events instead of a bandaid to fix excessive overlap.
Not all combinations of the 230/224 are optimum, and there is a set amount of variability associated with any cam's results, but a trap speed at 122 MPH for a MILD cam-only car is nothing to sneeze at (VIPRETR2's car, 3500#s).
I like this approach to laying out a cam better than just picking a pair of lobes and putting them on a "fuel injection lobe seperation angle".
Steveo346, I applaud your choice.
Ben T.