Did I order the wrong k-member? MUSTANG
#1
TECH Apprentice
Thread Starter
iTrader: (15)
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Texas
Posts: 374
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Did I order the wrong k-member? MUSTANG
I just ordered my k-member. I have a 95 but I ordered the 86-93 4.6 k-member. Is this correct or should I have ordered the 96-98 k member? Need to know asap so I can call Jegs if I messed up.
#4
TECH Apprentice
Thread Starter
iTrader: (15)
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Texas
Posts: 374
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by Mr. Hyde
I don't know for sure...but it seems like the 96-98 4.6 K-member would be the ideal part, seeing as the chassis is the same.
#5
Launching!
iTrader: (5)
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Phoenix, Arizona
Posts: 275
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Call some place like Maximum Motorsports or Griggs Racing. They do all the Mustang suspension stuff. My guess is that you want the 96-98 version since it will increase the wheelbase a little bit over the 87-93 version. You can get away with putting a 96-98 version in a fox car but it's tight on clearance on the wheel openings due to the increased wheelbase.
#6
TECH Apprentice
Thread Starter
iTrader: (15)
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Texas
Posts: 374
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by Quick Double Nickel
Call some place like Maximum Motorsports or Griggs Racing. They do all the Mustang suspension stuff. My guess is that you want the 96-98 version since it will increase the wheelbase a little bit over the 87-93 version. You can get away with putting a 96-98 version in a fox car but it's tight on clearance on the wheel openings due to the increased wheelbase.
#7
Staging Lane
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Huntsville, AL
Posts: 51
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by Quick Double Nickel
My guess is that you want the 96-98 version since it will increase the wheelbase a little bit over the 87-93 version. You can get away with putting a 96-98 version in a fox car but it's tight on clearance on the wheel openings due to the increased wheelbase.
Trending Topics
#8
Launching!
iTrader: (5)
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Phoenix, Arizona
Posts: 275
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I think it's like 1 to 1-1/2 inches. Plus Maximum and Griggs both make offset A-arms to increase it to 2 or 2-1/2 inches. You have to do some pretty major grinding and cutting of the front fenders to accomplish that (even more so on 87-90 cars). I think only their race cars runs the offset A-arms. But for the race guys who are looking to get as close as possible to a 50/50 weight balance, they'll try anything they can.
#9
Banned
iTrader: (17)
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: So Cal
Posts: 258
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
By increasing wheel base, you mean front to back??
I have a 96+ 4.6L D&D Tubular K-member in my 90 LX for the LS1 and I didnt notice the wheelbase change. What did I not notice (I've had skinnies on it since I put it in, so maybe I didnt see something)
I have a 96+ 4.6L D&D Tubular K-member in my 90 LX for the LS1 and I didnt notice the wheelbase change. What did I not notice (I've had skinnies on it since I put it in, so maybe I didnt see something)
#12
TECH Apprentice
Thread Starter
iTrader: (15)
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Texas
Posts: 374
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by Brains
Yup, your front wheels will move backwards with the K-member you ordered, and your steering shaft will probably be too long.