Big stock cube cams (Trex, MS3/4, etc.,) in strokers (400"+)
#1
TECH Fanatic
Thread Starter
iTrader: (17)
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Little Elm, TX
Posts: 1,501
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Big stock cube cams (Trex, MS3/4, etc.,) in strokers (400"+)
How do the big cams that you guys are putting in stock cube motors running in a stroker? Does it kinda make those big cams small cams? Just curious if anyone was running like a 403 LS2 with an MS3, MS4, Trex?
#2
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (46)
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Atlanta, GA
Posts: 525
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I know someone that went from an LS2 to a 402 with an MS4 in both. The cam istn too big to begin with but a lot more taming in larger cubes. The larger cubes make up for the lost torque that big cames offer in smaller cubes.
#3
Super Hulk Smash
iTrader: (7)
Exactly. You don't need to overcam a big engine to make big power. An MS4 or T-Rex would be pretty good cams in a 402 for example with a FAST 90. The FAST restricts the peak torque to 4800 and the peak horsepower to 6300-6400. The VEs for that means an IVC (intake valve closing) of around 50 degrees at .050" on a 402 will make the best power under the curve while delivering an awesome peak.
The T-Rex offers an IVC of 49 and the MS4 offers an IVC of 48.5 degrees as both offer 2 degrees of advance ground in. So, they will peak a little earlier than 6300. But, you have a good match to your intake for the given CID.
The MS3 on a 113 with no advance has an IVC of 51.5, which is also very good. Because it's a little smaller duration wise, it will still make the torque with the higher IVC (also due to the EVC or exhaust valve closing). I actually like the MS3 as a very good overall power cam for a 402. I've seen 515rwhp 495rwtq out of small port headed 402s with the MS3. I don't know about you, but some of the huge cammed, huge ported heads are only around 520-530rwhp with 460-470rwtq. I'd gladly give up 5-10rwhp at peak for another 30rwtq everywhere below 5500.
The T-Rex offers an IVC of 49 and the MS4 offers an IVC of 48.5 degrees as both offer 2 degrees of advance ground in. So, they will peak a little earlier than 6300. But, you have a good match to your intake for the given CID.
The MS3 on a 113 with no advance has an IVC of 51.5, which is also very good. Because it's a little smaller duration wise, it will still make the torque with the higher IVC (also due to the EVC or exhaust valve closing). I actually like the MS3 as a very good overall power cam for a 402. I've seen 515rwhp 495rwtq out of small port headed 402s with the MS3. I don't know about you, but some of the huge cammed, huge ported heads are only around 520-530rwhp with 460-470rwtq. I'd gladly give up 5-10rwhp at peak for another 30rwtq everywhere below 5500.
#4
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Elmhurst, IL (Chicago Suburb)
Posts: 1,851
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by JakeFusion™
Exactly. You don't need to overcam a big engine to make big power. An MS4 or T-Rex would be pretty good cams in a 402 for example with a FAST 90. The FAST restricts the peak torque to 4800 and the peak horsepower to 6300-6400. The VEs for that means an IVC (intake valve closing) of around 50 degrees at .050" on a 402 will make the best power under the curve while delivering an awesome peak.
The T-Rex offers an IVC of 49 and the MS4 offers an IVC of 48.5 degrees as both offer 2 degrees of advance ground in. So, they will peak a little earlier than 6300. But, you have a good match to your intake for the given CID.
The MS3 on a 113 with no advance has an IVC of 51.5, which is also very good. Because it's a little smaller duration wise, it will still make the torque with the higher IVC (also due to the EVC or exhaust valve closing). I actually like the MS3 as a very good overall power cam for a 402. I've seen 515rwhp 495rwtq out of small port headed 402s with the MS3. I don't know about you, but some of the huge cammed, huge ported heads are only around 520-530rwhp with 460-470rwtq. I'd gladly give up 5-10rwhp at peak for another 30rwtq everywhere below 5500.
The T-Rex offers an IVC of 49 and the MS4 offers an IVC of 48.5 degrees as both offer 2 degrees of advance ground in. So, they will peak a little earlier than 6300. But, you have a good match to your intake for the given CID.
The MS3 on a 113 with no advance has an IVC of 51.5, which is also very good. Because it's a little smaller duration wise, it will still make the torque with the higher IVC (also due to the EVC or exhaust valve closing). I actually like the MS3 as a very good overall power cam for a 402. I've seen 515rwhp 495rwtq out of small port headed 402s with the MS3. I don't know about you, but some of the huge cammed, huge ported heads are only around 520-530rwhp with 460-470rwtq. I'd gladly give up 5-10rwhp at peak for another 30rwtq everywhere below 5500.
Well said words of wisdom and I agree 100%
#6
11 Second Club
iTrader: (3)
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: berkeley ca
Posts: 732
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
search is your friend I asked the same question (sort of) almost 2 years ago.
https://ls1tech.com/forums/generation-iii-internal-engine/277458-not-your-everyday-cam-question-regarding-big-motor-small-cam.html
https://ls1tech.com/forums/generation-iii-internal-engine/280975-408-stroker-guys-inside-please.html
https://ls1tech.com/forums/generation-iii-internal-engine/277458-not-your-everyday-cam-question-regarding-big-motor-small-cam.html
https://ls1tech.com/forums/generation-iii-internal-engine/280975-408-stroker-guys-inside-please.html
#7
TECH Senior Member
Yeah, jake has it on the money, I run a 232/234 113 49 IVC in my 370cid and the numbers speak for themselves. 6200 peak (carries to neverland) and 4800 trq peak
(Ported BBK/80mm modified LS6)
(Ported BBK/80mm modified LS6)
Trending Topics
#8
TECH Fanatic
Thread Starter
iTrader: (17)
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Little Elm, TX
Posts: 1,501
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by JakeFusion™
Exactly. You don't need to overcam a big engine to make big power. An MS4 or T-Rex would be pretty good cams in a 402 for example with a FAST 90. The FAST restricts the peak torque to 4800 and the peak horsepower to 6300-6400. The VEs for that means an IVC (intake valve closing) of around 50 degrees at .050" on a 402 will make the best power under the curve while delivering an awesome peak.
The T-Rex offers an IVC of 49 and the MS4 offers an IVC of 48.5 degrees as both offer 2 degrees of advance ground in. So, they will peak a little earlier than 6300. But, you have a good match to your intake for the given CID.
The MS3 on a 113 with no advance has an IVC of 51.5, which is also very good. Because it's a little smaller duration wise, it will still make the torque with the higher IVC (also due to the EVC or exhaust valve closing). I actually like the MS3 as a very good overall power cam for a 402. I've seen 515rwhp 495rwtq out of small port headed 402s with the MS3. I don't know about you, but some of the huge cammed, huge ported heads are only around 520-530rwhp with 460-470rwtq. I'd gladly give up 5-10rwhp at peak for another 30rwtq everywhere below 5500.
The T-Rex offers an IVC of 49 and the MS4 offers an IVC of 48.5 degrees as both offer 2 degrees of advance ground in. So, they will peak a little earlier than 6300. But, you have a good match to your intake for the given CID.
The MS3 on a 113 with no advance has an IVC of 51.5, which is also very good. Because it's a little smaller duration wise, it will still make the torque with the higher IVC (also due to the EVC or exhaust valve closing). I actually like the MS3 as a very good overall power cam for a 402. I've seen 515rwhp 495rwtq out of small port headed 402s with the MS3. I don't know about you, but some of the huge cammed, huge ported heads are only around 520-530rwhp with 460-470rwtq. I'd gladly give up 5-10rwhp at peak for another 30rwtq everywhere below 5500.