Generation III Internal Engine 1997-2006 LS1 | LS6
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

Big stock cube cams (Trex, MS3/4, etc.,) in strokers (400"+)

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 12-01-2006, 06:50 PM
  #1  
TECH Fanatic
Thread Starter
iTrader: (17)
 
DoesSpeedTurnUon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Little Elm, TX
Posts: 1,501
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default Big stock cube cams (Trex, MS3/4, etc.,) in strokers (400"+)

How do the big cams that you guys are putting in stock cube motors running in a stroker? Does it kinda make those big cams small cams? Just curious if anyone was running like a 403 LS2 with an MS3, MS4, Trex?
Old 12-01-2006, 10:41 PM
  #2  
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (46)
 
Oh4GTO's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Atlanta, GA
Posts: 525
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

I know someone that went from an LS2 to a 402 with an MS4 in both. The cam istn too big to begin with but a lot more taming in larger cubes. The larger cubes make up for the lost torque that big cames offer in smaller cubes.
Old 12-01-2006, 11:23 PM
  #3  
Super Hulk Smash
iTrader: (7)
 
JakeFusion's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Pace, FL
Posts: 11,255
Received 137 Likes on 114 Posts

Default

Exactly. You don't need to overcam a big engine to make big power. An MS4 or T-Rex would be pretty good cams in a 402 for example with a FAST 90. The FAST restricts the peak torque to 4800 and the peak horsepower to 6300-6400. The VEs for that means an IVC (intake valve closing) of around 50 degrees at .050" on a 402 will make the best power under the curve while delivering an awesome peak.

The T-Rex offers an IVC of 49 and the MS4 offers an IVC of 48.5 degrees as both offer 2 degrees of advance ground in. So, they will peak a little earlier than 6300. But, you have a good match to your intake for the given CID.

The MS3 on a 113 with no advance has an IVC of 51.5, which is also very good. Because it's a little smaller duration wise, it will still make the torque with the higher IVC (also due to the EVC or exhaust valve closing). I actually like the MS3 as a very good overall power cam for a 402. I've seen 515rwhp 495rwtq out of small port headed 402s with the MS3. I don't know about you, but some of the huge cammed, huge ported heads are only around 520-530rwhp with 460-470rwtq. I'd gladly give up 5-10rwhp at peak for another 30rwtq everywhere below 5500.
Old 12-02-2006, 12:12 AM
  #4  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (1)
 
Chicago Crew UnderBoss's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Elmhurst, IL (Chicago Suburb)
Posts: 1,851
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by JakeFusion™
Exactly. You don't need to overcam a big engine to make big power. An MS4 or T-Rex would be pretty good cams in a 402 for example with a FAST 90. The FAST restricts the peak torque to 4800 and the peak horsepower to 6300-6400. The VEs for that means an IVC (intake valve closing) of around 50 degrees at .050" on a 402 will make the best power under the curve while delivering an awesome peak.

The T-Rex offers an IVC of 49 and the MS4 offers an IVC of 48.5 degrees as both offer 2 degrees of advance ground in. So, they will peak a little earlier than 6300. But, you have a good match to your intake for the given CID.

The MS3 on a 113 with no advance has an IVC of 51.5, which is also very good. Because it's a little smaller duration wise, it will still make the torque with the higher IVC (also due to the EVC or exhaust valve closing). I actually like the MS3 as a very good overall power cam for a 402. I've seen 515rwhp 495rwtq out of small port headed 402s with the MS3. I don't know about you, but some of the huge cammed, huge ported heads are only around 520-530rwhp with 460-470rwtq. I'd gladly give up 5-10rwhp at peak for another 30rwtq everywhere below 5500.

Well said words of wisdom and I agree 100%
Old 12-02-2006, 12:13 AM
  #5  
Super Hulk Smash
iTrader: (7)
 
JakeFusion's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Pace, FL
Posts: 11,255
Received 137 Likes on 114 Posts

Default

Also by restricts, I mean it's optimized for those RPM ranges. Fighting it diminishes results. The FAST 90 is optimized for 6300/4800 even on bigger engines if the cam's VEs are set up correctly.
Old 12-02-2006, 10:00 AM
  #6  
11 Second Club
iTrader: (3)
 
dame's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: berkeley ca
Posts: 732
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

search is your friend I asked the same question (sort of) almost 2 years ago.

https://ls1tech.com/forums/generation-iii-internal-engine/277458-not-your-everyday-cam-question-regarding-big-motor-small-cam.html

https://ls1tech.com/forums/generation-iii-internal-engine/280975-408-stroker-guys-inside-please.html
Old 12-02-2006, 10:24 AM
  #7  
TECH Senior Member
 
PREDATOR-Z's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: BFE
Posts: 14,620
Likes: 0
Received 16 Likes on 16 Posts

Default

Yeah, jake has it on the money, I run a 232/234 113 49 IVC in my 370cid and the numbers speak for themselves. 6200 peak (carries to neverland) and 4800 trq peak
(Ported BBK/80mm modified LS6)
Old 12-02-2006, 10:33 AM
  #8  
TECH Fanatic
Thread Starter
iTrader: (17)
 
DoesSpeedTurnUon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Little Elm, TX
Posts: 1,501
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by JakeFusion™
Exactly. You don't need to overcam a big engine to make big power. An MS4 or T-Rex would be pretty good cams in a 402 for example with a FAST 90. The FAST restricts the peak torque to 4800 and the peak horsepower to 6300-6400. The VEs for that means an IVC (intake valve closing) of around 50 degrees at .050" on a 402 will make the best power under the curve while delivering an awesome peak.

The T-Rex offers an IVC of 49 and the MS4 offers an IVC of 48.5 degrees as both offer 2 degrees of advance ground in. So, they will peak a little earlier than 6300. But, you have a good match to your intake for the given CID.

The MS3 on a 113 with no advance has an IVC of 51.5, which is also very good. Because it's a little smaller duration wise, it will still make the torque with the higher IVC (also due to the EVC or exhaust valve closing). I actually like the MS3 as a very good overall power cam for a 402. I've seen 515rwhp 495rwtq out of small port headed 402s with the MS3. I don't know about you, but some of the huge cammed, huge ported heads are only around 520-530rwhp with 460-470rwtq. I'd gladly give up 5-10rwhp at peak for another 30rwtq everywhere below 5500.
Thats kinda what I was thinking. So which one would provide the most torque, say around 5000rpm? Reason I need torque more than horsepower is I autocross not dragrace, so i'm not concerned with peak HP
Old 12-02-2006, 11:09 AM
  #9  
TECH Senior Member
 
PREDATOR-Z's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: BFE
Posts: 14,620
Likes: 0
Received 16 Likes on 16 Posts

Default

Then custom is the way to go



Quick Reply: Big stock cube cams (Trex, MS3/4, etc.,) in strokers (400"+)



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:56 PM.