LT1-LT4 Modifications 1993-97 Gen II Small Block V8

Vette LT1: Advertised or Actual?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 05-15-2007, 09:31 AM
  #1  
TECH Senior Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (3)
 
Formula350's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Decatur, TN (N-W of Athens)
Posts: 7,564
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Default Vette LT1: Advertised or Actual?

So the LT1 Vettes, did they really make 300hp and 340-350tq, or was that just a marketing ploy? If they did make more power, whats the difference between the F and Y body LT1s? Is the extra power all in the Vette's dual exhaust?
Old 05-15-2007, 09:51 AM
  #2  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (6)
 
lt197formula's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Buda, Texas
Posts: 1,070
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

As far as I know the engines were the same except for the exhaust setup. I'm thinking it was the same marketing technique as GM did for the Ls1 Corvettes over the Ls1 F-bodies. They didn't want to advertise a cheaper car making the same power as their flagship car.

Edit: Just looked in the basic Lt1 specs sticky and everything was the exact same except that the Corvettes had 4-bolt mains.
Old 05-15-2007, 09:57 AM
  #3  
TECH Senior Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (3)
 
Formula350's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Decatur, TN (N-W of Athens)
Posts: 7,564
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Default

Well that's a shame. I hope now that I chipped my car (and if I can get that drv O2 changed) I'll beat my friends 94 M6 Vette. All he has done is cat delete, and we removed the air cleaner cover middle so it's open element. Think I have a chance? My EGR and AIR are programed out, among many other things I tinkered with.
Old 05-15-2007, 10:11 AM
  #4  
TECH Veteran
iTrader: (11)
 
infinitebird's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Atlanta, GA
Posts: 4,280
Received 46 Likes on 35 Posts

Default

The vette LT1 makes the same power as the f-body (minus maybe a slight difference in the exhaust setup), which is pretty close to the advertised number. It's the f-body advertised number that is not accurate.
Old 05-15-2007, 10:18 AM
  #5  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (6)
 
lt197formula's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Buda, Texas
Posts: 1,070
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

I'm pretty sure a C4 is lighter than an F-body and he has an m6 while you have an a4. I'm assuming you don't have a stall since it isn't listed in your sig? It depends on how well he can drive an m6, if he knows how to drive then it should be a close race with him edging you out I would think. Post up results after you run him.
Old 05-15-2007, 10:36 AM
  #6  
Staging Lane
 
346Vette's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 79
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

LT1 vettes make the same power 6-speed for 6-speed when compared to a F-body. The only advantage is the Vette has 3.45 gears through a ZF6 tranny which has a great gear set, it is around 3250 lbs in weight (don't know an F-body's weight), 4-bolt mains, and an awesome dana 44 rearend. They are only as good as thier weakest link, so it depends who has a better opti in my opinion =). They should be relatively close on a dynojet. My LT4 put down 308rwhp @105k on stock opti and it's only rated at 330hp from the factory =). LT4's are underated to make all the people who bought 97 C5's feel better even though LT4's make the same hp if not more and have a much better tq curve.
Old 05-15-2007, 10:39 AM
  #7  
Banned
 
GGPC's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 160
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

My 93 vette auto, when it was stock, made 266.3hp and 307.5tq on the dyno.So I guess 300 and 340 they claim were close enough.
Old 05-15-2007, 10:43 AM
  #8  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (6)
 
lt197formula's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Buda, Texas
Posts: 1,070
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

Originally Posted by 346Vette
LT1 vettes make the same power 6-speed for 6-speed when compared to a F-body. The only advantage is the Vette has 3.45 gears through a ZF6 tranny which has a great gear set, it is around 3250 lbs in weight (don't know an F-body's weight), 4-bolt mains, and an awesome dana 44 rearend. They are only as good as thier weakest link, so it depends who has a better opti in my opinion =). They should be relatively close on a dynojet. My LT4 put down 308rwhp @105k on stock opti and it's only rated at 330hp from the factory =). LT4's are underated to make all the people who bought 97 C5's feel better even though LT4's make the same hp if not more and have a much better tq curve.
Thanks for the info. F-bodies range in weight depending on the options of the car from around 3400-3800.

By the way very cleaning looking C4 you have there, same color/rim combo as my car
Old 05-15-2007, 11:27 AM
  #9  
12 Second Club
iTrader: (1)
 
METALBEAST's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Cleveland, Georgia
Posts: 3,027
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by GGPC
My 93 vette auto, when it was stock, made 266.3hp and 307.5tq on the dyno.So I guess 300 and 340 they claim were close enough.

Those are pretty good numbers. I never dynoed my 92 a4 Vette when it was stock.
Old 05-15-2007, 11:32 AM
  #10  
TECH Senior Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (3)
 
Formula350's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Decatur, TN (N-W of Athens)
Posts: 7,564
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Default

Yea, all the numbers for cars are flywheel ratings, so once you get everything to the ground you've lost around 15-35hp and roughly the same with torque. The say about 10hp lost in a manual and 20-25 from an auto. Then you have the rear end and tires etc which takes a more ponies out of it. So I'd say your LT4 and 93 Vette are right on the money. @ 105K that's good you're still making strong power.

Thankfully, I just remember, I think he has the 2.73 gears mwahahha I'd have to double check that but seriously he maxes out the car @ the Governor in 3rd or 4th (135 or 140mph). It's pretty sad. Should've been a Highway Patrol Vette lol It is decked out in options though. I want the 3-way adjustable suspension from his!!

Right now he has to get his opti in order and every time he flushes the car it keeps coming out REALY nasty he says. Runs water for 30mins and nasty. So I don't know if someone put Dex in with some Green or wth. But his pump started going out and dripped on the Opti :\ HOPEFULLY we'll get a line up this summer. Maybe by then I'll actually have my 58mm on >_>
Old 05-15-2007, 12:21 PM
  #11  
12 Second Club
iTrader: (129)
 
fergymoto's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Rock Hill, SC
Posts: 2,810
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts

Default

My WS6 weighed in at 3385, it has all options minus the CD disc changer. It did not have the front sway bar or spare tire when weighed. This was also with 3/4 tank of gas. Just something to go on
Old 05-15-2007, 01:47 PM
  #12  
TECH Resident
iTrader: (1)
 
That_guy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Desoto Tx
Posts: 899
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

the vette had aluminum heads and a true dual exhaust.
Old 05-15-2007, 02:07 PM
  #13  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (6)
 
lt197formula's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Buda, Texas
Posts: 1,070
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

Originally Posted by That_guy
the vette had aluminum heads and a true dual exhaust.
F-bodies had aluminum heads also... only the B-bodies had cast iron heads. The only difference was the intake/exhaust setup between F-bodies and Y-bodies.
Old 05-15-2007, 02:14 PM
  #14  
Banned
 
GGPC's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 160
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by METALBEAST
Those are pretty good numbers. I never dynoed my 92 a4 Vette when it was stock.
If you think those are good, they had a 95 vette man. with a cut lid and air foil for the tb hit 291hp and 319tq.
Old 05-15-2007, 02:23 PM
  #15  
TECH Senior Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (3)
 
Formula350's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Decatur, TN (N-W of Athens)
Posts: 7,564
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by That_guy
the vette had aluminum heads and a true dual exhaust.
You need to refrain from posting "facts" Might I suggest a few hours infront of Wikipedia?
Old 05-15-2007, 10:48 PM
  #16  
TECH Resident
iTrader: (1)
 
That_guy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Desoto Tx
Posts: 899
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

ok u got me on that one i did some research but whur was i wrong at lol i found out the zr1 had a lt5 instead of the lt4 lol. o yea the lt5 holds the best record for something the even the c6 z oh cant beat.
Old 05-16-2007, 04:59 AM
  #17  
Banned
iTrader: (36)
 
daniel6718's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: garland tx
Posts: 3,760
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

think they are all the same motors...
Old 05-16-2007, 06:16 AM
  #18  
11 Second Club
iTrader: (88)
 
the_merv's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: The Beach...
Posts: 19,261
Received 63 Likes on 54 Posts

Default

LT1 was introduced in 1992 into the Corvette, 1993 into the F-cars. (I know that they are in Caprices, Impala SS, Roadmasters, and Cadillac Broughams, but we are talking about performance Cars here, not Taxi's..)It was factory production until 1996 in the Corvette, and 1997 in the F-cars.
The Corvette and F-body LT1's are identical, right down to the Cam. The difference being the 4-bolt Mains.
The LT4 was introduced in 1996, it had different Intake, Heads, Cam, Crank, Pistons, and Timing Gears and Chain. It was in the Special Edition Corvettes (Collectors Edition, Grand Sport), and in the 1997 30th Anniversary Camaro SS, which 100 were made.
The LT5 was concept in 1987-1989 when it was joint-built with Lotus, introduced in 1990 into the Corvette only. The Engine is a 5.7l, TWIN-DOHC 32 Valve Engine that had 400hp/370tq Factory stock.
The base Corvette in 1990 was the L98, the special edition 1990 ZR1 had the LT1 Corvette Body Style. This remained in production until 1995. All ZR1's are M6's, and all were fixed Hard Tops, no Targa Tops or Convertibles.
Old 05-16-2007, 07:50 AM
  #19  
TECH Regular
 
briannutter's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Cleveland
Posts: 437
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

When my '94 c4 was stock and 115k miles (totally worn out valve springs) it made 264whp. Tunercat and 160 stat got it to 290whp. better springs would have made it peak at 5500 rather than 5100 and I might have hit 300, but I yanked the motor and spent the last year and a half building it.
Old 05-16-2007, 08:45 AM
  #20  
12 Second Club
iTrader: (1)
 
METALBEAST's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Cleveland, Georgia
Posts: 3,027
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Formula350
Yea, all the numbers for cars are flywheel ratings, so once you get everything to the ground you've lost around 15-35hp and roughly the same with torque. The say about 10hp lost in a manual and 20-25 from an auto. Then you have the rear end and tires etc which takes a more ponies out of it. So I'd say your LT4 and 93 Vette are right on the money. @ 105K that's good you're still making strong power.

Thankfully, I just remember, I think he has the 2.73 gears mwahahha I'd have to double check that but seriously he maxes out the car @ the Governor in 3rd or 4th (135 or 140mph). It's pretty sad. Should've been a Highway Patrol Vette lol It is decked out in options though. I want the 3-way adjustable suspension from his!!

Right now he has to get his opti in order and every time he flushes the car it keeps coming out REALY nasty he says. Runs water for 30mins and nasty. So I don't know if someone put Dex in with some Green or wth. But his pump started going out and dripped on the Opti :\ HOPEFULLY we'll get a line up this summer. Maybe by then I'll actually have my 58mm on >_>
They don't have 2.73s. Even WORSE. The stock rear is a 2.59.


Quick Reply: Vette LT1: Advertised or Actual?



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:12 PM.