Dynamometer Results & Comparisons Dyno Records | Dyno Discussion | Dyno Wars

Why the ms3 is no good for the street!

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 05-01-2008, 01:40 AM
  #1  
9 Second Club
Thread Starter
iTrader: (21)
 
camscam02's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: sacramento, CA
Posts: 3,240
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default Why the ms3 is no good for the street!

was doing some thinking and was bored so I was analyzing my dyno graphs and wow this cam is not a good dd cam( mine is a racecar so i dont care) but for an all around DD wow....

this is to all the noonbs that thing biggest is always the best, this graph explains it all

300 rwhp wasnt made until 4700... and it makes 400 at 5800... talk about pulling up top



just some food for thought.

mods: MS3 on 112, stock heads, ported FAST 90/90, 85mm Maf/lid, SSra, 13/4 pacesetters, dynomax bullet off each collector

stock 10 bolt, 4.10's, locked 4400 stall and dynoed on 28 inch slicks
superflow dyno
Old 05-01-2008, 09:34 AM
  #2  
11 Second Club
iTrader: (39)
 
BADSZ28's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: NW Chicago Subs
Posts: 3,321
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

It is all in the tune IMO. My guess is your tune is not spot on under 4k since you have a loose converter. There are big cams that make good power in the low and mid range.
Old 05-01-2008, 11:09 AM
  #3  
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (2)
 
gator's 99TA's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Tampa Bay
Posts: 9,971
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts

Default

i dont understand why its no good for the street?
Old 05-01-2008, 11:24 AM
  #4  
TECH Regular
 
ExTurbo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Westampton, NJ
Posts: 444
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

thats why i like my little cam Keep in mind though that would probably be alot better of a cam in an M6 car, where you could put the car right in its powerband if you were racing on the street. IT all comes down to what type of powerband your looking for and even what car your putting it in....for a GTO i like a smaller cam for more tq in the lower RPM's, most guys that actually perform at the track (at least with GTO's) run a smaller grind. Lighter F-bods can probably get away with the larger grinds for more high end power.
Old 05-01-2008, 11:25 AM
  #5  
TECH Resident
iTrader: (13)
 
LS1 BU's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: South Elgin
Posts: 865
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

I think that cam need more than stock compression.
Old 05-01-2008, 12:01 PM
  #6  
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (2)
 
gator's 99TA's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Tampa Bay
Posts: 9,971
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts

Default

btw, looking at your mods, lol. its not much a street car. that cam is perfect for your combo IMO.
Old 05-01-2008, 01:19 PM
  #7  
9 Second Club
Thread Starter
iTrader: (21)
 
camscam02's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: sacramento, CA
Posts: 3,240
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by gator's 99TA
btw, looking at your mods, lol. its not much a street car. that cam is perfect for your combo IMO.
im not complaining about my set up one bit as it is a race car...

i just wanted to show how it makes no power down low compared to the mid size cams...

overlap a graph of a mid sized cam graph and you will see what im talking about...
Old 05-01-2008, 01:25 PM
  #8  
11 Second Club
iTrader: (39)
 
BADSZ28's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: NW Chicago Subs
Posts: 3,321
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Yeah, but I think your power is off down low compared to others of similar size cams. IIRC, my T-Rex made about 300rwtq at 3000RPMS on a Mustang Dyno through 4.56s and a 9" with locker. You are only at about 250. I have sean other MS4s make similar power down low to mine.
Old 05-01-2008, 01:27 PM
  #9  
9 Second Club
Thread Starter
iTrader: (21)
 
camscam02's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: sacramento, CA
Posts: 3,240
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

well start posting some graphs...

all i have seen dont make great power til 4k or so...
Old 05-01-2008, 01:29 PM
  #10  
11 Second Club
iTrader: (39)
 
BADSZ28's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: NW Chicago Subs
Posts: 3,321
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

I will have to dig mine up.
Old 05-01-2008, 01:30 PM
  #11  
9 Second Club
Thread Starter
iTrader: (21)
 
camscam02's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: sacramento, CA
Posts: 3,240
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

here is a graph of another ms3 pretty much the same thing

https://ls1tech.com/forums/attachmen...4&d=1206560352
Old 05-01-2008, 01:31 PM
  #12  
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (21)
 
Jefro6996's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Macomb, MI
Posts: 529
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

my ms4 made 300rwtq at like 2400 rpm and by 3000 rpm it was like 330rwtq. this was also done on a mustang dyno with a 9'' rear. i also have heads, but my compressions is only around 10.5-10.6 with the valve reliefs in my pistons.

Old 05-01-2008, 01:31 PM
  #13  
LS1Tech Sponsor
iTrader: (12)
 
Slowhawk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Bridgewater,Ma
Posts: 14,865
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes on 6 Posts

Default

The MS3 is a top end rpm area Cam unless you raise the compression up.I prefer smaller cams that make more power under the curve.
Old 05-01-2008, 01:41 PM
  #14  
9 Second Club
Thread Starter
iTrader: (21)
 
camscam02's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: sacramento, CA
Posts: 3,240
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by Jefro6996
my ms4 made 300rwtq at like 2400 rpm and by 3000 rpm it was like 330rwtq. this was also done on a mustang dyno with a 9'' rear. i also have heads, but my compressions is only around 10.5-10.6 with the valve reliefs in my pistons.

ya but heads are a different story

cant find alot of graphs of ms3 for some reason
Old 05-01-2008, 02:14 PM
  #15  
11 Second Club
iTrader: (39)
 
BADSZ28's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: NW Chicago Subs
Posts: 3,321
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Not mine, but you get the idea.

https://ls1tech.com/forums/attachmen...7&d=1139117822
Old 05-01-2008, 02:17 PM
  #16  
9 Second Club
Thread Starter
iTrader: (21)
 
camscam02's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: sacramento, CA
Posts: 3,240
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by BADSZ28
thats not even a fair comparison! lol
Old 05-01-2008, 02:35 PM
  #17  
Launching!
 
Ryan L's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 229
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by gator's 99TA
i dont understand why its no good for the street?
No torque. Who cruises at 6k RPM?
Old 05-01-2008, 02:41 PM
  #18  
11 Second Club
iTrader: (39)
 
BADSZ28's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: NW Chicago Subs
Posts: 3,321
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by camscam02
thats not even a fair comparison! lol
Why not? Fine take away 50 accross the board. Still higher in the low range than you get.
Old 05-01-2008, 02:42 PM
  #19  
9 Second Club
Thread Starter
iTrader: (21)
 
camscam02's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: sacramento, CA
Posts: 3,240
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by BADSZ28
Why not? Fine take away 50 accross the board. Still higher in the low range than you get.
im not worried one bit about my numbers... car runs damn good for what i use it for...

just trying to show to people that it doesnt make good low power
Old 05-01-2008, 03:14 PM
  #20  
11 Second Club
iTrader: (39)
 
BADSZ28's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: NW Chicago Subs
Posts: 3,321
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by camscam02

just trying to show to people that it doesnt make good low power
This is exactly what I am oposing. Big cams do make good low end. Anything at or above 300rwtq is good low end cam only. And most big cams do just that. My point is you can't make a blanket statement just because your numbers are low in the low end. This does not mean your car is not capable of better low end numbers. My guess is your tuner did most of the tuning above 4k and did not dial in the low end, so your low end numbers are low.


Quick Reply: Why the ms3 is no good for the street!



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:49 AM.