Nitrous Oxide Installation | Tuning | Products
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

Dyno #'s

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 12-12-2005, 10:04 AM
  #1  
On The Tree
Thread Starter
iTrader: (33)
 
CamminV6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: North Carolina
Posts: 125
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default Dyno #'s

Finally got to tune the car for spray. I have the basic NX wet kit. I have the TSP 231/237 cam and all bolt ons.

NA - 405 rwhp 380 rwtq

75 shot - 475 rwhp 465 rwtq

150 shot - 529 rwhp 616 rwtq

How do these numbers look, this is all new to me.

Last edited by CamminV6; 12-13-2005 at 11:35 AM.
Old 12-12-2005, 10:10 AM
  #2  
TECH Junkie
iTrader: (23)
 
Turo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Tallahassee, FL
Posts: 3,467
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

You got 124rwhp out of the NX 150 shot. Not bad, but NX is usually fairly accurate so I would expect it to be closer to the 550 range. What was your bottle pressure at?

Still, numbers look strong (especially the N/A ), the torque is definitely there . Now go to the track and put all that power to good use .

Last edited by Turo; 12-12-2005 at 10:18 AM.
Old 12-12-2005, 10:36 AM
  #3  
FormerVendor
 
NXJeremy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Wichita Falls,Tx
Posts: 864
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Numbers look good. You could probably pick them up some with a little tuning. What was the air/fuel ratio on the runs? I am guessing that they were in the 10.5-11.0:1 range if you used the recommended jetting. We normally try to get the vehicle to run 11.8-12.0:1 on the nitrous. This would pick the numbers up some and still be safe. Just something to think about.

Now get us some times with the newfound power!
Old 12-12-2005, 10:36 AM
  #4  
Banned
iTrader: (7)
 
Cheater's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: dallas
Posts: 833
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

nice #'s
Old 12-12-2005, 10:45 AM
  #5  
On The Tree
Thread Starter
iTrader: (33)
 
CamminV6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: North Carolina
Posts: 125
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

This was with a tune, Air Fuel was 12.9ish, I know most say go richer but I wanted to keep my NA tune where it was since I only plan to spray at the track.
Old 12-12-2005, 11:09 AM
  #6  
FormerVendor
 
NXJeremy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Wichita Falls,Tx
Posts: 864
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

That seems a little high in comparison to the amount of power that it picked up. Not that that a/f is dangerous, but that it is a little lean to not have picked up the full 150hp and 75hp. If you're happy with it, then that is all that really matters.
Old 12-12-2005, 11:24 AM
  #7  
On The Tree
Thread Starter
iTrader: (33)
 
CamminV6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: North Carolina
Posts: 125
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

well, the nitrous numbers were made on my NA tune, I'm sure he could have done some tuning and got more. Plus, I made only one pull with each shot, I just wanted to be sure it wasn't too lean or too rich, numbers are the biggest concern.
Old 12-18-2005, 11:56 AM
  #8  
Launching!
iTrader: (2)
 
Nakoz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Norco, Louisiana
Posts: 211
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Nice numbers! I have the same cam and through a 12 bolt daily driver I put down 397 NA. I am trying to finish wiring up my NX kit, but I am waiting on a digital switch. I should have it completed after the holidays. I am anxious to see the new numbers, especially after seeing yours.

Thanx
Old 12-18-2005, 01:36 PM
  #9  
On The Tree
iTrader: (2)
 
Stalker WS6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: MS / NC
Posts: 190
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

So.....was the A/F 12.90ish or the 13.2 you originally stated?? What was the leanest it got at the top??

Did you go get retuned for the bigger jets?? If so do you have a comparison graph between the first tune then the retune???
Old 12-18-2005, 01:39 PM
  #10  
10 Second Club
iTrader: (6)
 
silverZ98's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: eastern north carolina
Posts: 715
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

yea you said before that you was 13.0 across board then whent up past that in the upper rpms. im confused
Old 12-18-2005, 09:13 PM
  #11  
On The Tree
Thread Starter
iTrader: (33)
 
CamminV6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: North Carolina
Posts: 125
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

for the most part it was around 13.0, it was 12.9 and then climbed up to 13.7 at the highest point and I havent gotten it retuned with the new jet yet, plan to do that after the holiday
Old 12-18-2005, 11:38 PM
  #12  
On The Tree
iTrader: (2)
 
Stalker WS6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: MS / NC
Posts: 190
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Keep us posted on how the new tune works out.
Old 12-19-2005, 09:10 AM
  #13  
On The Tree
Thread Starter
iTrader: (33)
 
CamminV6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: North Carolina
Posts: 125
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

will do, hopefully the new jet will fix the lean problem.




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:50 PM.