PCM Diagnostics & Tuning HP Tuners | Holley | Diablo
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

Change cl afr?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 11-12-2009, 06:23 PM
  #1  
Staging Lane
Thread Starter
 
COMPRACER's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 75
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default Change cl afr?

Can the stoich afr be changed to say 13.5 instead of 14.7 and run in closed loop as long as all tables are dialed in? Or can you only do this in open loop?
Old 11-12-2009, 07:47 PM
  #2  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (9)
 
Texas_WS6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Odessa, Texas
Posts: 1,775
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts

Default

The problem would be that you would be telling the PCM that stoich is 13.5, so the PCM would still lean out until it saw the NB O2's indicate the switch from rich to lean, and then it would continue to switch from lean to rich and back to lean at the stoich point. So it would still be running at stoich (14.68) and all of the tables (there is more dealing with this then just the VE tables) would be off. The NB O2 sensors only work at stoich.

My suggestion is if you want to constantly command 13.5 9Except at WOT/PE mode) then turn off the Closed loop function by maxing out the temp in the closed loop table. Then set your Open loop table up to command the AFR you want it to. You will have to tune the VE tables with the use of a WB. I am not sure the MAF sensor will be relevant at that point though. This is one of the steps you have to do to tune the VE. I personally do not use Closed Loop at this time, I am running my setup in Speed Density Open Loop. I do plan on eventually going to SD Closed Loop once I am finished tuning everything out.

So why do you want to command 13.5 instead of 14.68? There may be ways to work around this if you do not mind explaining the reason/issue you are having.

Last edited by Texas_WS6; 11-12-2009 at 07:51 PM. Reason: Spelling
Old 11-12-2009, 07:51 PM
  #3  
Staging Lane
Thread Starter
 
COMPRACER's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 75
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Car is an 01 F body LS1, 229/239-600-600-114 cam , mast small bore L92 heads, L76 intake. I can get all my fuel trims +/- 3-5% running closed loop sd.
The engine just seems happier and smoother @ 13.5 instead of 14.6. Especially at idle.
Old 11-12-2009, 07:59 PM
  #4  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (9)
 
Texas_WS6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Odessa, Texas
Posts: 1,775
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts

Default

I know what you mean with it running happier at the richer setting. That is my main reason for not really wanting to go back to closed loop. I am running mine in OL targeting 12.5 and it does not even sound like it has a 230/240 cam in it. It is too darn smooth really. I have been told there is a way to run the PCM in a “Hybrid" way so that it is in OL when idling and low rpm like when driving around town, but it will go into CL once you reach a desired rpm, like when you are cruising down the highway. This way it will help with bucking and surging, but still get good fuel mileage when running down the road. Maybe some on here can inform us how to do this.

Last edited by Texas_WS6; 11-12-2009 at 08:03 PM. Reason: Man I need to learn how to spell!!!!!!!!!!
Old 11-12-2009, 08:13 PM
  #5  
Staging Lane
Thread Starter
 
COMPRACER's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 75
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

That would be a great help.
Old 11-12-2009, 11:47 PM
  #6  
10 Second Club
 
ND2RACE's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Columbus Ohio
Posts: 224
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Texas_WS6
I know what you mean with it running happier at the richer setting. That is my main reason for not really wanting to go back to closed loop. I am running mine in OL targeting 12.5 and it does not even sound like it has a 230/240 cam in it. It is too darn smooth really. I have been told there is a way to run the PCM in a “Hybrid" way so that it is in OL when idling and low rpm like when driving around town, but it will go into CL once you reach a desired rpm, like when you are cruising down the highway. This way it will help with bucking and surging, but still get good fuel mileage when running down the road. Maybe some on here can inform us how to do this.
This can be done for sure by running one of EFIlive's custom operating system like I'm doing. You can command whatever AFR you want, and when you command stoich it'll use the STFTs. It really does work well. You may also look into your spark at lower RPMs, light load. With some spark tuning I'm back to running stoich without much problem down there.
Old 11-13-2009, 09:45 AM
  #7  
Moderator
iTrader: (11)
 
jimmyblue's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: East Central Florida
Posts: 12,605
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes on 6 Posts

Default

You don't want to lie about the chemistry, which is what
the stoich ratio number is for.

If you want to push closed loop fueling targets, do it by
the O2 sensor switchpoint voltages (vs airflow / airflow
mode). You could raise the mV numbers for where you
idle, and watch how the wideband moves.

Realize that a big cam at idle can be spoofing your
wideband as well as narrowband sensors, so tuning to
an indicated AFR reading may not put you to best
idle quality or economy.
Old 11-14-2009, 04:45 PM
  #8  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (25)
 
shoemike's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Prescott, AZ
Posts: 1,283
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts

Default

Changing EQ1 will have an effect on all the fuel tables.
Old 11-16-2009, 02:36 PM
  #9  
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (7)
 
slow's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Orlando
Posts: 6,151
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

changing EQ will not change the stoich point of the fuel, and in closed loop the o2 sensors find the stoich point of the fuel, regardless of the setting in the calibration.



Ryan
Old 11-16-2009, 02:54 PM
  #10  
Jedi Master
iTrader: (3)
 
Gh0st's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: MN
Posts: 668
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by slow
changing EQ will not change the stoich point of the fuel, and in closed loop the o2 sensors find the stoich point of the fuel, regardless of the setting in the calibration.



Ryan
bingo
Old 11-17-2009, 08:15 AM
  #11  
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (1)
 
WeathermanShawn's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Denver International Airport, Colorado USA
Posts: 549
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I have heard of a few people who change the PE Enable percentage to 0% TPS to at lower Rpm's to stay 'open-loop' at idle.

I have no idea if it works. There are so many smarter custom tuning options now, that that idea may be antiquated.

As JimmyBlue stated, it is hard to trust a wideband or the narrowbands at idle, that determining your true AFR 'sweet-spot' is difficult to know. I stay closed-loop and just manipulate the idle O2 switch-points to make it work.

Hope that helps.

..WeathermanShawn..
Old 11-17-2009, 02:26 PM
  #12  
11 Second Club
iTrader: (37)
 
white01ss's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Dallas, TX
Posts: 656
Received 9 Likes on 9 Posts

Default another vote for O2 switch points

I'm doing this exact same thing. Had my stock cam idling at 14.7, but after a cam swap it was running an average of 15.0 and bucking sometimes in parking lots. Time to fatten it up a bit.

Like JB says, raising the voltage of the O2 switch points does the trick. Make small changes at a time as just adding 5-10 mV can have a big impact on the average AFR. Also, you only need to change the lower 4 cells (CL 0-24) as they control idle and off idle.

Good Luck.




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:23 AM.