Can O2's not report 14.7AFR?
#1
TECH Resident
Thread Starter
Can O2's not report 14.7AFR?
My car failed the emmisions test. CO2 and the other gas was like 10times under the limit, they said the lambda was off, probably caused by old cats. So I thought I'd get some new cats. Thought I'd go the whole hog and get Dynotech LT's, High flow cats and Y-pipe. Went back for emmisions again today, and still lambda is off. Havn't changed the O2's, the cats are new, like 40miles on them.
I can see my O2's occilatiing very nicely, pretty fast apart from tick over, but I guess thats normal. I'm wondering if the O2's are dirty can they be occilating at 14.2 for example? Got emmisions retest on Saturday. I'm in england so cant get new O2's before then. Can they be cleaned? is this my problem?
Picture of O2's working attached.
I can see my O2's occilatiing very nicely, pretty fast apart from tick over, but I guess thats normal. I'm wondering if the O2's are dirty can they be occilating at 14.2 for example? Got emmisions retest on Saturday. I'm in england so cant get new O2's before then. Can they be cleaned? is this my problem?
Picture of O2's working attached.
#2
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (23)
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Watertown, NY
Posts: 8,797
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
The pic isnt that clear but it looks like your LTFT is like -14, which is too rich. May need to fix your tune. Hopefully someone else chimes in that is a little better than I am.
#3
Moderator
iTrader: (11)
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: East Central Florida
Posts: 12,605
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes
on
6 Posts
They look pretty well behaved, the O2s. Cats have
nothing to do with lambda, though. That's just an
expression of mixture going in. Cats have to deal with
the residual products. The O2 switchpoint is deisgned
to be 14.7 for gasoline but it really works off oxygen
content. Anything that introduces air into the exhaust
will fool the system into thinking it's lean and make the
cylinder charge rich to compensate. But the trims indicate
the opposite problem, naturally rich and being pulled back
to lean by the trims. Why would fuel be delivered long?
Either an overreported airflow, high fuel pressure or some
error in modeling the injectors, those would be the top 3.
I'd verify the IFT table against what you can calculate up
for the 42#ers and measured fuel pressure, be sure you
know what the Walbro is delivering now. Then have to
check into how you deleted EGR, did that get properly
related to the speed density tune (low throttle VE sure
will change)? Maybe you should post the VE table you
have now. Ported MAF, oh joy. That's a science project
that you might want to save until you're convinced the
rest is straightened up. If it's even in the picture
anymore?
The AIR being gone, might get you some cold start emissions
trouble, it's meant to help the cats light off quick. If you
have the cats, why not keep AIR?
nothing to do with lambda, though. That's just an
expression of mixture going in. Cats have to deal with
the residual products. The O2 switchpoint is deisgned
to be 14.7 for gasoline but it really works off oxygen
content. Anything that introduces air into the exhaust
will fool the system into thinking it's lean and make the
cylinder charge rich to compensate. But the trims indicate
the opposite problem, naturally rich and being pulled back
to lean by the trims. Why would fuel be delivered long?
Either an overreported airflow, high fuel pressure or some
error in modeling the injectors, those would be the top 3.
I'd verify the IFT table against what you can calculate up
for the 42#ers and measured fuel pressure, be sure you
know what the Walbro is delivering now. Then have to
check into how you deleted EGR, did that get properly
related to the speed density tune (low throttle VE sure
will change)? Maybe you should post the VE table you
have now. Ported MAF, oh joy. That's a science project
that you might want to save until you're convinced the
rest is straightened up. If it's even in the picture
anymore?
The AIR being gone, might get you some cold start emissions
trouble, it's meant to help the cats light off quick. If you
have the cats, why not keep AIR?
#4
TECH Resident
Thread Starter
Originally Posted by brad8266
The pic isnt that clear but it looks like your LTFT is like -14, which is too rich. May need to fix your tune. Hopefully someone else chimes in that is a little better than I am.
#5
TECH Senior Member
as mentioned, the O2s measure lambda not necessarily 14.7:1 ... your sensors look fine, but looks like you're running rich (LTRIMs are pulling fuel)...
I'm wondering how they're measuring lambda.... maybe they meant hydrocarbons? (excessive hydrocarbons come from running too rich, NOx will be high if too lean)
Is this emissions in the UK? Do they only do sniffer or do they also do OBDII?
I'm wondering how they're measuring lambda.... maybe they meant hydrocarbons? (excessive hydrocarbons come from running too rich, NOx will be high if too lean)
Is this emissions in the UK? Do they only do sniffer or do they also do OBDII?
#6
TECH Resident
Thread Starter
Originally Posted by jimmyblue
They look pretty well behaved, the O2s. Cats have
nothing to do with lambda, though. That's just an
expression of mixture going in. Cats have to deal with
the residual products. The O2 switchpoint is deisgned
to be 14.7 for gasoline but it really works off oxygen
content. Anything that introduces air into the exhaust
will fool the system into thinking it's lean and make the
cylinder charge rich to compensate. But the trims indicate
the opposite problem, naturally rich and being pulled back
to lean by the trims. Why would fuel be delivered long?
Either an overreported airflow, high fuel pressure or some
error in modeling the injectors, those would be the top 3.
I'd verify the IFT table against what you can calculate up
for the 42#ers and measured fuel pressure, be sure you
know what the Walbro is delivering now. Then have to
check into how you deleted EGR, did that get properly
related to the speed density tune (low throttle VE sure
will change)? Maybe you should post the VE table you
have now. Ported MAF, oh joy. That's a science project
that you might want to save until you're convinced the
rest is straightened up. If it's even in the picture
anymore?
The AIR being gone, might get you some cold start emissions
trouble, it's meant to help the cats light off quick. If you
have the cats, why not keep AIR?
nothing to do with lambda, though. That's just an
expression of mixture going in. Cats have to deal with
the residual products. The O2 switchpoint is deisgned
to be 14.7 for gasoline but it really works off oxygen
content. Anything that introduces air into the exhaust
will fool the system into thinking it's lean and make the
cylinder charge rich to compensate. But the trims indicate
the opposite problem, naturally rich and being pulled back
to lean by the trims. Why would fuel be delivered long?
Either an overreported airflow, high fuel pressure or some
error in modeling the injectors, those would be the top 3.
I'd verify the IFT table against what you can calculate up
for the 42#ers and measured fuel pressure, be sure you
know what the Walbro is delivering now. Then have to
check into how you deleted EGR, did that get properly
related to the speed density tune (low throttle VE sure
will change)? Maybe you should post the VE table you
have now. Ported MAF, oh joy. That's a science project
that you might want to save until you're convinced the
rest is straightened up. If it's even in the picture
anymore?
The AIR being gone, might get you some cold start emissions
trouble, it's meant to help the cats light off quick. If you
have the cats, why not keep AIR?
The Cats are only on there for the emmitions test, the day after this test the cats are coming off and the straight throgh pope will be fitted, in this pipe is my wideband sensor.
Made sure my new LT headers didn't have a port for AIR system, it looks a little nicer and I beleved it wasn't needed if I was removing the cats. Also no port for EGR on the new headers, and the LSX intake manifold I left the port plugged.
EGR was disabled by a few things...
Engine / Airflow / Dynamic Airflow / EGR Test Disable = 0.0
Engine / EGR Enabmes = Disabled
Engine / Diag Disable speed = 6mph
Engine / Diag Enable speed = 8mph
Engine / Spark Control / Spark Advance / EGR Correction = All cells in table zeroed out.
I mentioned ported MAF, acutally its just stock MAF with anodised MAF ends, from Thunder Racing, cant find thier part number on there website at the moment. I could take the MAF oput of the equations, in fact I think I will when I do an SD tune over the next days. Just need to avoid the cops as the car is illegal on the road at the moment with no emmisions ticket.
Injector Flow Rate:-
49.66635 49.97637 50.28640 50.53442 50.84445 51.15448 51.46450 51.71253 52.02255 52.27057 52.58060 52.89063 53.13865 53.44868 53.69670 54.00673 54.25475
Fuel rail pressure is showing about 60psi, I have an analogue guage on the fuel rails.
The headers were put on at the weekend, I dont think there is any leaks, I'll double check. If there is a leak and oxygen is getting in it would explain alot.
I do notice I get a lot of negative fuel trims under 30kpa, I guess thats the lack of EGR.
#7
TECH Resident
Thread Starter
Originally Posted by horist
as mentioned, the O2s measure lambda not necessarily 14.7:1 ... your sensors look fine, but looks like you're running rich (LTRIMs are pulling fuel)...
I'm wondering how they're measuring lambda.... maybe they meant hydrocarbons? (excessive hydrocarbons come from running too rich, NOx will be high if too lean)
Is this emissions in the UK? Do they only do sniffer or do they also do OBDII?
I'm wondering how they're measuring lambda.... maybe they meant hydrocarbons? (excessive hydrocarbons come from running too rich, NOx will be high if too lean)
Is this emissions in the UK? Do they only do sniffer or do they also do OBDII?
Trending Topics
#8
TECH Resident
Thread Starter
Found emmisions test from last year.
CO needs to be <0.30%vol
Car produced 0.03%vol
HC needs to be <200ppm vol
Car produced 2ppm vol
Lambda needs to be 0.970 - 1.030
Car produced 1.005
So last year is all passed.
This year my CO and HC are about the same. Lambda is 1.070 which is a fail. Which I guess it means it thinks I'm running 15.7AFR which would make you think some how air is getting into the pipes.
CO needs to be <0.30%vol
Car produced 0.03%vol
HC needs to be <200ppm vol
Car produced 2ppm vol
Lambda needs to be 0.970 - 1.030
Car produced 1.005
So last year is all passed.
This year my CO and HC are about the same. Lambda is 1.070 which is a fail. Which I guess it means it thinks I'm running 15.7AFR which would make you think some how air is getting into the pipes.
Last edited by RedWS6 00; 03-29-2006 at 03:14 PM.
#9
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (4)
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Fairview Heights Illinois
Posts: 1,851
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by RedWS6 00
Which I guess it means it thinks I'm running 15.7AFR which would make you think some how air is getting into the pipes.
That's just poetic.
I suppose new O2 sensors might solve it.
I would also check for exhaust leaks between your front O2's and the tailpipes.
Do they stick the sniffer up the pipe or does the exhaust go to a remote sensor?
#10
TECH Resident
Thread Starter
Originally Posted by white2001s10
So you fail an emissions test for passing too much fresh air out the exhaust.
That's just poetic.
I suppose new O2 sensors might solve it.
I would also check for exhaust leaks between your front O2's and the tailpipes.
Do they stick the sniffer up the pipe or does the exhaust go to a remote sensor?
That's just poetic.
I suppose new O2 sensors might solve it.
I would also check for exhaust leaks between your front O2's and the tailpipes.
Do they stick the sniffer up the pipe or does the exhaust go to a remote sensor?
I guess its possible air if coming in after the front O2 sensors. I'll check the exhaust for leaks.
#11
TECH Resident
Thread Starter
I know the front O2's control all the fuel balancing, do the rear O2's have any effect, I beleive they only let you know if the cats are working. I'm just wondering as I havn't logged the rear O2's for some time, if they are malfunctioning could they make me fail the emmisions?
I guess the front O2's say it all, they beleive the fuel/air balancing is perfect...
arrgghhh, I'm going round in circles. I bet after all this they have a dodgy tester at the emmisions station.
Right I'm going to start to wire up my wideband. Drill some holes at lunch time to get the cable to the engine bay, and plug in the sensor tonight. I bet my sensor is better calibrated than their system. I'll plug it in place of one of the rear O2's.
I guess the front O2's say it all, they beleive the fuel/air balancing is perfect...
arrgghhh, I'm going round in circles. I bet after all this they have a dodgy tester at the emmisions station.
Right I'm going to start to wire up my wideband. Drill some holes at lunch time to get the cable to the engine bay, and plug in the sensor tonight. I bet my sensor is better calibrated than their system. I'll plug it in place of one of the rear O2's.
#12
Moderator
iTrader: (11)
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: East Central Florida
Posts: 12,605
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes
on
6 Posts
Is there any chance that UK petrol has a different AFR
stoichiometry than the US 14.7:1 gasoline?
You might want to look closer at the O2 switching behavior
at the points where you are being "probed", make sure you
do not have a sleepy problem at idle ("ticking over"?) that
needs more heat kept in the tubes etc.
Not sure going to long tubes and high flow cats, will help
you relative to the original setup.
stoichiometry than the US 14.7:1 gasoline?
You might want to look closer at the O2 switching behavior
at the points where you are being "probed", make sure you
do not have a sleepy problem at idle ("ticking over"?) that
needs more heat kept in the tubes etc.
Not sure going to long tubes and high flow cats, will help
you relative to the original setup.
#13
TECH Resident
Thread Starter
Originally Posted by jimmyblue
Is there any chance that UK petrol has a different AFR
stoichiometry than the US 14.7:1 gasoline?
You might want to look closer at the O2 switching behavior
at the points where you are being "probed", make sure you
do not have a sleepy problem at idle ("ticking over"?) that
needs more heat kept in the tubes etc.
Not sure going to long tubes and high flow cats, will help
you relative to the original setup.
stoichiometry than the US 14.7:1 gasoline?
You might want to look closer at the O2 switching behavior
at the points where you are being "probed", make sure you
do not have a sleepy problem at idle ("ticking over"?) that
needs more heat kept in the tubes etc.
Not sure going to long tubes and high flow cats, will help
you relative to the original setup.
I have removed one of the rear O2's now and put in place the wideband sensor so I can see it on the dash. First time I have used this sensor, I know I have put it after the cat and not ment to, but I'm hoping it should give me an idea of the AFR.
I have found another testing station who get road leagal dragsters through the emmisions test, so I do have a fall back plan, it will cost, and they dont know too much about my car, usually older american cars they deal with.
#15
TECH Resident
Thread Starter
Originally Posted by white2001s10
I have a feeling your system is working perfectly and they just didn't put their sensor far enough up the pipe.