Suspension & Brakes Springs | Shocks | Handling | Rotors

How Noticeable Will An STB and SFC's Be When Put On At Same Time?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 06-04-2004, 03:00 AM
  #1  
TECH Enthusiast
Thread Starter
 
TransAm52804's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Davenport, Iowa
Posts: 593
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default How Noticeable Will An STB and SFC's Be When Put On At Same Time?

For my next mods, I plan on getting BMR's Xtreme STB and their SFC's. Since I don't plan on lowering my car ever, I'll probably go with boxed weld-in SFC's. When the STB and SFC's are all installed, how noticeable will their improvements be? I don't plan on doing any autocrossing, but I'd like to tie the chassis together and make it as strong as I can.
Old 06-04-2004, 04:33 AM
  #2  
On The Tree
 
Trans Am's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Scottsdale, AZ
Posts: 178
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by TransAm52804
For my next mods, I plan on getting BMR's Xtreme STB and their SFC's. Since I don't plan on lowering my car ever, I'll probably go with boxed weld-in SFC's. When the STB and SFC's are all installed, how noticeable will their improvements be? I don't plan on doing any autocrossing, but I'd like to tie the chassis together and make it as strong as I can.
Very
Old 06-04-2004, 10:58 AM
  #3  
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (4)
 
trackbird's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: OH
Posts: 5,110
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Trans Am
Very

What he said.....
Old 06-04-2004, 11:28 AM
  #4  
TECH Veteran
iTrader: (6)
 
2001CamaroGuy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Phoenix, AZ USA
Posts: 4,766
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

what both of them said.....

STB will keep the frontend stiff and the subframes take care of the middle section of the car. Its too bad there isn't a rear stb like mustangs have.
Old 06-04-2004, 04:16 PM
  #5  
TECH Enthusiast
Thread Starter
 
TransAm52804's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Davenport, Iowa
Posts: 593
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Exactly. I'm not sure how it'd be mounted with all the **** we have in our trunks, but a rear STB would be immensely beneficial I imagine, seeing as how we are hatchbacks.
Old 06-04-2004, 04:42 PM
  #6  
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (4)
 
trackbird's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: OH
Posts: 5,110
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by TransAm52804
Exactly. I'm not sure how it'd be mounted with all the **** we have in our trunks, but a rear STB would be immensely beneficial I imagine, seeing as how we are hatchbacks.

I think they call that a cage.
Old 06-04-2004, 06:00 PM
  #7  
TECH Junkie
iTrader: (9)
 
Fulton 1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: WA
Posts: 3,326
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Please think long and hard before buying the bulky weld-in boxed SFC's. If ever you do want to lower the car or you sell it to someone who does, you're stuck. There are a handful of good tubular SFC's (LG, GW, etc) out there that lose no ground clearance whatsoever. Another option would be the SLP bolt-ins, they're tubular, but can be removed if so desired. Just my opinion...

SFC's will make very noticeable difference in the tightness of the car. I had mine installed when the car was almost brand new and I immediately felt a nice improvement. I noticed a slight improvement in doing the STB (mainly in the form of quicker steering response and more "direct" turn-in - for lack of a better description), but not dramatic. Both are nice improvements though IMO, especially the SFC's.
Old 06-04-2004, 07:14 PM
  #8  
TECH Addict
 
XtinctHawk02's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Cypress, TX USA
Posts: 2,378
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

I have this set up but for the convertible. You can't even see my sfc's. I noticed a HUGE difference. The car ride's really stiff without any flexing at all.
Old 06-04-2004, 07:47 PM
  #9  
12 Second Club
iTrader: (3)
 
00PewterSS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Hartland, MI
Posts: 850
Received 25 Likes on 20 Posts

Default

Exhaust hangs lower than the SFC. I have welded in BMR SFC and regular STB. Car fealt like a brick after installation.

Brian
Old 06-04-2004, 08:13 PM
  #10  
TECH Enthusiast
Thread Starter
 
TransAm52804's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Davenport, Iowa
Posts: 593
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

"Brick". Good or bad term?
Old 06-04-2004, 08:18 PM
  #11  
TECH Junkie
iTrader: (9)
 
Fulton 1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: WA
Posts: 3,326
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by TransAm52804
"Brick". Good or bad term?
I remember pilots saying that flying the old MiG-25 was like flying a "brick". I wondered the same thing...
Old 06-04-2004, 09:29 PM
  #12  
TECH Enthusiast
 
f-bodman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Grand Rapids, MI
Posts: 539
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

My weld in global west sfc's made a huge difference, I think this should be a mandatory mod on a t-top car.
Old 06-04-2004, 11:37 PM
  #13  
Teching In
 
HairStraightBack's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 37
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I just put in Spohn cromoly sfcs today. The fit was awesome and you cant see them at all from the side. These only weigh 7lbs each too.
Old 06-05-2004, 12:09 AM
  #14  
12 Second Club
iTrader: (3)
 
00PewterSS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Hartland, MI
Posts: 850
Received 25 Likes on 20 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by TransAm52804
"Brick". Good or bad term?
lol... I meant brick vs. noodle. Bricks are pretty torsionally rigid. The suspension does the work rather than the body now, so it feels quite stiff. As for the Mig... I would think flying a brick can't be a good thing.

Brian
Old 06-07-2004, 11:30 PM
  #15  
12 Second Club
iTrader: (6)
 
Viper's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Cleveland, OH
Posts: 4,908
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts

Default

SLP bolt on's are boxed, not tubular.

Regardless, it does stiffen the chassis tremendously, the SFC's more than the STB.
Old 06-08-2004, 12:58 AM
  #16  
Cal
TECH Veteran
iTrader: (1)
 
Cal's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Northern Utah
Posts: 4,692
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts

Default

I have SLP BOXED SFC's, and my car is lowered 2.5" rear, 2.0" front. No problems with clearance except in automatic car washes.
Old 06-08-2004, 12:59 AM
  #17  
Cal
TECH Veteran
iTrader: (1)
 
Cal's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Northern Utah
Posts: 4,692
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by trackbird
I think they call that a cage.
Good answer, I was going to say that!
Old 06-08-2004, 11:19 AM
  #18  
TECH Enthusiast
 
2w0s060's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Posts: 579
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Fulton 1
Please think long and hard before buying the bulky weld-in boxed SFC's. If ever you do want to lower the car or you sell it to someone who does, you're stuck. There are a handful of good tubular SFC's (LG, GW, etc) out there that lose no ground clearance whatsoever. Another option would be the SLP bolt-ins, they're tubular, but can be removed if so desired. Just my opinion...

SFC's will make very noticeable difference in the tightness of the car. I had mine installed when the car was almost brand new and I immediately felt a nice improvement. I noticed a slight improvement in doing the STB (mainly in the form of quicker steering response and more "direct" turn-in - for lack of a better description), but not dramatic. Both are nice improvements though IMO, especially the SFC's.
I have the box style weld ins, lowered with no issues. On a TA your side skirts as well as most Y-pipes will hang lower then these SFC designs. As for the SLPs, as far as I know there Diamond style bolt in version hangs lower then the BMRs or similar design. Being the cross the chassis as they do.

Not saying the tubular designs are good, they are just as good. But I would not be afraid of running the Boxed style. I am very pleased. Im not a pro but thats my opion
Old 06-08-2004, 02:08 PM
  #19  
TECH Junkie
iTrader: (9)
 
Fulton 1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: WA
Posts: 3,326
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by 2w0s060
I have the box style weld ins, lowered with no issues. On a TA your side skirts as well as most Y-pipes will hang lower then these SFC designs. As for the SLPs, as far as I know there Diamond style bolt in version hangs lower then the BMRs or similar design. Being the cross the chassis as they do.

Not saying the tubular designs are good, they are just as good. But I would not be afraid of running the Boxed style. I am very pleased. Im not a pro but thats my opion
Pound for pound the round cross-section will have better torsional rigidity than the square tube. So, I just don't see the need for a square-tube 2-point SFC (like the BMR) when a tubular design can be made to weigh less and tuck up better. The SLP design has a "double diamond" design which will add some more rigidity beyond the standard 2-point setup and they're a bolt-in design so they can be removed if so desired. Just my opinion. Just about any SFC will be beneficial on these cars in my experience.
Old 06-08-2004, 02:30 PM
  #20  
TECH Enthusiast
 
2w0s060's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Posts: 579
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Fulton 1
Pound for pound the round cross-section will have better torsional rigidity than the square tube. So, I just don't see the need for a square-tube 2-point SFC (like the BMR) when a tubular design can be made to weigh less and tuck up better. The SLP design has a "double diamond" design which will add some more rigidity beyond the standard 2-point setup and they're a bolt-in design so they can be removed if so desired. Just my opinion. Just about any SFC will be beneficial on these cars in my experience.
I agree, and I do see your opinion and where you are coming from. Weight saving is a big issue with some ppl.

I am just really pleased with the fit and feel of mine, I guess I like to brag



Quick Reply: How Noticeable Will An STB and SFC's Be When Put On At Same Time?



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:56 PM.