How do NASCAR engines make 750+HP?
But in all possibilites, it's impossible for a 350CI engine to run the HP they are running N/A right?? Engine masters are only making 600HP and up with a max restriction of 366ci in the small block competition. Although they are restricted to pump gas. But still, John Kasse was running in the upwards of 35 degrees of timing on his winning pull (it was detonating though, but that's why he has coatings).
Am I missing something?
Thanks,
Philip S.
The secret is making great BMEP at 8700-9500. IOW, pumping lots of air at those rpms. Cup engines have to use flat lifter cams. 9700 isn 't all that much problem for them now, but it is ungodly expensive to do.
also are you sure on the compression? They are spinning these motors pretty high, nothing like IRL cars though
Trending Topics
The Best V8 Stories One Small Block at Time
But in all possibilites, it's impossible for a 350CI engine to run the HP they are running N/A right?? Engine masters are only making 600HP and up with a max restriction of 366ci in the small block competition. Although they are restricted to pump gas. But still, John Kasse was running in the upwards of 35 degrees of timing on his winning pull (it was detonating though, but that's why he has coatings).
Am I missing something?
Thanks,
Philip S.

Bret
For a smaller displacement engine with a high flowing port, the only way to actually take advantage of the available air flow is to rev the heck out of it, as has already been noted in this thread. Not so for a bigger displacement motor. My '67 has a 548 CID big block, with heads that flow about 380 CFM at max lift, and makes 618 RWHP (about 730 crank HP) with a very streetable cam.
The Engine Masters competition is another thing altogether. First, they can't )(by rule) use the kind of specialized heads that the Cup motors do. Just as important, the competition is about average power from (I think) 3000 - 6500 RPM. A Cup motor would lose that competition, badly, because they're designed to run from about 7000 to 9000 or so. But because HP is a function of torque and RPM, they make more power at those higher RPMs.
Bret
Philip S.
The lobes are welded to be able to withstand the abuse they take 
Thanks for the discussion guys!
i forgot where i read it, but they grind hundreds of cams and heads and just toss them out when they dont make the power of the previous "best" cam or head setup. must be nice to have that kinda research at your disposal
. i forgot where i read it, but they grind hundreds of cams and heads and just toss them out when they dont make the power of the previous "best" cam or head setup. must be nice to have that kinda research at your disposal
.the cash they have on hand to spend is inconciveable, and there are hundreds of teams that are spending like that too
Last edited by 69firebird; Oct 23, 2005 at 08:19 PM.
If you want to be amazed by engine technology take 3.0L NA (183 cu in) and put out 900+ hp and pushing 20,000 rpm
Its all about optimizing all of the components to work together. You can actually design engines to create over 100% volumetric effiency without forced induction.
Not to be a stick in the mud, but nascar engines do not have the enigneering power (and $$) behind them like F1. But the nascar rules prevent technology from filtering into the sport of carburation and 9" rears... (zzzzzz)


