Shaker Air Box for Shaker Scoop OR Cowl Induction hoods...
#62
![Default](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Do a search on Google about low pressure zones and cowl induction and you'll understand. Our cars are too aerodynamic for a small scoop to actually get "ram" air which according to all the tests doesn't do anything until well into triple digits where as cowl induction happens quickly due to the low pressure zone at the base of the windshield.
#63
![Default](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Do a search on Google about low pressure zones and cowl induction and you'll understand. Our cars are too aerodynamic for a small scoop to actually get "ram" air which according to all the tests doesn't do anything until well into triple digits where as cowl induction happens quickly due to the low pressure zone at the base of the windshield.
#68
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (14)
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Phoenix/Tempe, AZ
Posts: 1,968
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
![](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/ranks/ls1tech10year.png)
![Default](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
![Happy](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/smilies/LS1Tech/gr_stretch.gif)
although i hadnt thought about the STB.. i just got mine
![Ripped](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/smilies3/ripped.gif)
![Chug! Chug! Chug!](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/smilies/LS1Tech/gr_chug.gif)
Also, i dont plan on starting a CF thing for my car, so that CF lid is still up for grabs. Mark post pics of that thing
![The Pimp](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/smilies/LS1Tech/gr_pimp.gif)
#70
TECH Regular
iTrader: (5)
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: La Puente/ Whittier, CA
Posts: 417
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
![](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/ranks/ls1tech10year.png)
![Default](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
I was always under the impression that the 4th gen f-body's windshield was way too raked back for a decent "cowl induction". On 1st gens and 70's chevelles etc. the windshield was less raked so during movment air would hit the glass and deflect downward creating that "low pressure" zone you speak of. On our cars it's too laid back to do that. If I've been misinformed please, correct me.
#71
![Default](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
I was always under the impression that the 4th gen f-body're windshield was way too raked back for a decent "cowl induction". On 1st gens and 70's chevelles etc. the windshield was less raked so during movment air would hit the glass and deflect downward creating that "low pressure" zone you speak of. On our cars it's too laid back to do that. If I've been misinformed please, correct me.