Appearance & Detailing Interior & Exterior Appearance Modifications

sunroof in a 4th gen? a wtf moment

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 06-01-2007, 08:22 PM
  #21  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (5)
 
Jeremiah's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Mustang, Ok
Posts: 1,332
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

The sun roof frame provides support for the metal "or in this case SMC" skin that it is mounted to but it does nothing for the structural frame work under the roof skin. Example... when you cut a big hole in the middle of the roof of a car the roof skin becomes floppy/flimsy. The frame work of the sun roof reinforces the outer panel or skin but it does nothing for the frame work under the skin. The structural integrity of the car is compromised by doing this.
Old 06-01-2007, 10:03 PM
  #22  
Staging Lane
 
pearceleather's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 73
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Ace$nyper
Am I correct though part of the roof structure runs right where a sunroof would be?
The roof bows are cut out.
Originally Posted by SmokeySS
I wonder what affect an aftermarket sunroof has on the resale value of a used car?
Increases value
\
Originally Posted by Ace$nyper
Ah ok that was what i really wondered the most being I know with a sawzall you can install them in anything, i just wondered how strong it was.
No sawzall. That would kill the skin.
Originally Posted by Intragration
I used to install those pop-ups in all kinds of cars. They're actually not bad quality, I'd feel more comfortable with one of those than with the power ones. The power ones are usually more fragile and they have a tendency to leak. The pop-ups usually don't leak, there's a lot less to go wrong with them.
The only way to get a leak is a poor installation

One manufacturer's roofs are bonded in, then braced. It actully adds more stabiliy to the roof, because it creates more surface area for bracing. You'd be suprised what some of the bows are. Some are planks, some are damn toothpicks.
The other I install is a bolt in application. It too is braced in as well at 6 points. The bows, usually 2 are removed, are only at 4 points.
Old 06-02-2007, 06:15 AM
  #23  
TECH Resident
iTrader: (21)
 
98MNBZ28's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Gainesville,FL/Riverdale, GA
Posts: 848
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts

Default

Old 06-02-2007, 07:45 AM
  #24  
TECH Resident
iTrader: (1)
 
Dip Stick's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Henderson, NC
Posts: 854
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

sold the car back in feb of 98 i believe. or feb of 97... I forget.
Old 06-02-2007, 10:27 AM
  #25  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (5)
 
Jeremiah's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Mustang, Ok
Posts: 1,332
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by pearceleather
It actully adds more stabiliy to the roof, because it creates more surface area for bracing. You'd be suprised what some of the bows are. Some are planks, some are damn toothpicks.
The other I install is a bolt in application. It too is braced in as well at 6 points. The bows, usually 2 are removed, are only at 4 points.
You are correct that "most" cars have only minor bracing that does nothing more than dampen the noise from rain ect, it does add a little support to the skin but not mutch. On "most" cars the support is in the form of two unitized structural rails that run above the doors on each side. In this example the sun roof frame would add structural integrity to the roof skin and not compromise the structural integrity of the car itself. The bracing you mention is only to help support the added weight of the sun roof so that the skin doesnt flex/distort under harsh road surfaces ect.

Its an entirely different situation in a fourth gen F body. The structural reinforcement you have to cut/remove in them is a major structural component to the cabin of the car. It should never be removed for any reason. I predict that these fourth gen cars with sun roofs will eventually see cracks in the roofs from torsional stress ect. most notably in the rear upper rear corner above the doors glass.

Last edited by Jeremiah; 06-02-2007 at 10:33 AM.
Old 06-02-2007, 11:15 AM
  #26  
TECH Resident
iTrader: (1)
 
Dip Stick's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Henderson, NC
Posts: 854
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

If you take it to extremes then you can prolly notice a difference in structural rigidity and bracing and safety. For daily driving with the occassinal trip to the drag-strip it's prolly safe enough. Now if you are endanger of flipping and having your hood smack a tree or telephone pole... then I think either way you are gonna be toast Or could always install a roll cage ( shrugs. I mean safety wise and strutural wise if you add in the sfc's and such I think you will do better than a 'vert in any situation where you flip or roll etc.

To bash these guys for putting in sunroofs etc and to ignore the fact that they have 'vert versions of them is funny I mean hell cut off the roof is safer than cutting a hole in it hehe...
Old 06-02-2007, 11:40 AM
  #27  
TECH Apprentice
iTrader: (1)
 
Intragration's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Northlake, IL
Posts: 325
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 2 Posts

Default

Actually, as I recall, coupes and T-tops have the exact same structure under the roof skin. There is a center brace, and this gives them their rigidity. The convertibles, which have no such bracing, have some type of factory subframe connectors or some other form of underbody bracing. Cutting out that center brace on a coupe to put in a sunroof is probably not the best idea, and I agree, it would probably lead to structural problems. A coupe with the brace removed, unlike a convertible, also still has a fixed roof skin, which will now be subjected to twisting and flexing stresses that don't bother the convertible top.

As for pop-up sunroofs versus articulated power ones, you're right, poor installation is what leads to leaking. It's just that there's a lot better chance for poor installation on a complicated install versus a simple pop-up.
Old 06-02-2007, 12:45 PM
  #28  
Staging Lane
 
David Tannenbaum's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Posts: 55
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by 68z28
I believe the verts came with subframe connectors from the factory, but that was it. Not positive on this though.

Ummm...no...or at least if they do they are completely ineffective.
I had the BMR's welded in as my passenger side door panel kept popping off every time I raced..then my dash craked down the middle and I was at the shop the following week.

As far as I know, they make the tops on the verts pretty strong, I know they are extremely heavy (read malfunctioning hydraulic system)
Old 06-02-2007, 01:00 PM
  #29  
11 Second Club
iTrader: (4)
 
02 Camaro SS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Rockland County, NY
Posts: 1,832
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

I can't imagine that looking too good on an fbody. Anyone have pictures?
Old 06-02-2007, 01:23 PM
  #30  
TECH Apprentice
iTrader: (1)
 
Intragration's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Northlake, IL
Posts: 325
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 2 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by David Tannenbaum
Ummm...no...or at least if they do they are completely ineffective.
I had the BMR's welded in as my passenger side door panel kept popping off every time I raced..then my dash craked down the middle and I was at the shop the following week.

As far as I know, they make the tops on the verts pretty strong, I know they are extremely heavy (read malfunctioning hydraulic system)
There is SOMETHING different with the undercarriage of the verts, not sure exactly what it is, but I know that certain underbody components are specific to either the vert or the HT/TT.
The following users liked this post:
wannafbody (12-06-2020)
Old 06-03-2007, 10:53 AM
  #31  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (5)
 
Jeremiah's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Mustang, Ok
Posts: 1,332
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Intragration
A coupe with the brace removed, unlike a convertible, also still has a fixed roof skin, which will now be subjected to twisting and flexing stresses that don't bother the convertible top.
Exactly,
A fiberglass or SMC fixed roof panel will not flex like the cloth covered skelleton of a convertible top. something has to give and this is where the stress cracks come into play.
Old 06-03-2007, 01:49 PM
  #32  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (2)
 
SVThis's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Lee County, VA
Posts: 1,080
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

i seen a sunroof on a 93-97 firebird with spinner hubcaps...every other fbody guy i have told doesn't believe me...oh well...does anyone know if this was a factory option or not?
Old 06-03-2007, 07:06 PM
  #33  
TECH Apprentice
iTrader: (-1)
 
bLkWdOw SS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 373
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by 98MNBZ28

I agree I want some pictures
The following 2 users liked this post by bLkWdOw SS:
rimfire27 (11-28-2020), wannafbody (12-06-2020)
Old 11-26-2020, 07:11 PM
  #34  
Registered User
 
HokeyPokeyer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2020
Posts: 2
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Dip Stick
Mine was power.. was pretty cool.. never leaked.. but wa sa little noisy and due to the mechanism it could only oopen up like halfway.

Shrusg dunno about the structural rigidity etc.. but I had pretty much stiffened it up with sfc's and stb and sways etc etc.. pretty much liek this car.. only it was lowered too.
I have a 96 with a powered sunroof like that, but now its stuck open and i cant find anywhere online on hiw to fix it. Do you know of anything? Atleast to get it closed?
Old 11-27-2020, 12:42 AM
  #35  
TECH Apprentice
iTrader: (1)
 
Intragration's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Northlake, IL
Posts: 325
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 2 Posts

Default

Holy crap...sunroofs in 4th gens are pretty mind-blowing, but not half as mind-blowing as LS1Tech threads, resurrected from a time when the Internet was half as old as it is today ha ha.

So as not to be a complete dick, I might have an answer for you. Powered sunroofs have motors. They are typically located near the front center of the sunroof opening. The motor operates a shaft, which in turn operates the left and right tracks, which open/close the sunroof. If you can locate the motor, there is usually a plug covering the centerline of the driven shaft, which can be operated with an allen wrench or some type of tool. Pop the plug, insert and operate tool, and this is likely to fix your problem.
The following 2 users liked this post by Intragration:
HokeyPokeyer (11-27-2020), wannafbody (12-06-2020)
Old 11-27-2020, 06:53 AM
  #36  
Registered User
 
HokeyPokeyer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2020
Posts: 2
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Intragration
Holy crap...sunroofs in 4th gens are pretty mind-blowing, but not half as mind-blowing as LS1Tech threads, resurrected from a time when the Internet was half as old as it is today ha ha.

So as not to be a complete dick, I might have an answer for you. Powered sunroofs have motors. They are typically located near the front center of the sunroof opening. The motor operates a shaft, which in turn operates the left and right tracks, which open/close the sunroof. If you can locate the motor, there is usually a plug covering the centerline of the driven shaft, which can be operated with an allen wrench or some type of tool. Pop the plug, insert and operate tool, and this is likely to fix your problem.
Thank you very much! I'll do that today. Hope you've had a good holiday!



Quick Reply: sunroof in a 4th gen? a wtf moment



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:26 AM.