a 3600 with 3:73s sound good?
05-21-2011, 11:38 PM
#2
I cant speak for the 3.73 but im more than happy with my stock 3.23 and ss3600. I will not change gear until the rear goes. When it does go it will more than likely be 3.73. Then when my trans goes I will most likely go with something like a pt4000 stall.
05-22-2011, 11:50 AM
#6
10 Second Club
iTrader: (7)
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: NYC
Posts: 131
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
3.73's and SS4000 in my cars, not daily driven but are driven almost everywhere they go. They sixty great for what they are (heavy) and I personally wouldnt put anything less than a 4000 behind an LS1 with a stock or mild cam.
Trending Topics
05-22-2011, 04:08 PM
#10
4000.
The difference is going to be minimal, as in you will never tell, under normal driving conditions. At wot there will be a nice difference. It will sixty harder as well as having better shift extensions. The trade off is worth it.
I don't know anyone that went 4000 and wished they went 3600, I know tons that went 3600 and first drive wished they went 4000.
The difference is going to be minimal, as in you will never tell, under normal driving conditions. At wot there will be a nice difference. It will sixty harder as well as having better shift extensions. The trade off is worth it.
I don't know anyone that went 4000 and wished they went 3600, I know tons that went 3600 and first drive wished they went 4000.
05-22-2011, 04:32 PM
#12
4000.
The difference is going to be minimal, as in you will never tell, under normal driving conditions. At wot there will be a nice difference. It will sixty harder as well as having better shift extensions. The trade off is worth it.
I don't know anyone that went 4000 and wished they went 3600, I know tons that went 3600 and first drive wished they went 4000.
The difference is going to be minimal, as in you will never tell, under normal driving conditions. At wot there will be a nice difference. It will sixty harder as well as having better shift extensions. The trade off is worth it.
I don't know anyone that went 4000 and wished they went 3600, I know tons that went 3600 and first drive wished they went 4000.
05-22-2011, 05:10 PM
#15
Yes sir, I have posted that over and over and people dont pay attention. A 3600 is a nice size converter but if you aren't spraying or fi, why not go 4000 for the added performance with a tradeoff you will never notice?
Justin, look at his mod list.
3600 will make you happy, until you ride in a 4000 car.
Justin, look at his mod list.
3600 will make you happy, until you ride in a 4000 car.
05-22-2011, 05:20 PM
#17
Yep Lemons is right op. But sometimes you gotta live and learn. I was worried even the 3600 might be to big at first. Lemons and others were saying go with the 4000! I tried staying conservative just in case and here I am thinking I could do 4k easy. Im also on 3.23 gear so its even loser feeling than 3.73s would be. I originally wanted a performer like the pt4000 and now kicking myself. But hey, this trans wont last forever (almost 100k) so next time around for me.
OP go with a 4k
OP go with a 4k
05-22-2011, 05:27 PM
#18
Yep Lemons is right op. But sometimes you gotta live and learn. I was worried even the 3600 might be to big at first. Lemons and others were saying go with the 4000! I tried staying conservative just in case and here I am thinking I could do 4k easy. Im also on 3.23 gear so its even loser feeling than 3.73s would be. I originally wanted a performer like the pt4000 and now kicking myself. But hey, this trans wont last forever (almost 100k) so next time around for me.
OP go with a 4k
OP go with a 4k
Never had a problem with it. Not saying it won't go but give it a little bit of credit.
