so what is the estimated difference ?
not anything at all really, unless you are a real bad *** driver that m6 is going to be hard to launch and hit all the gears perfectly. autos are faster that is why i got one, haha
, check out my times for proof, only 4 mods, be happy with that auto...
, check out my times for proof, only 4 mods, be happy with that auto...
Originally Posted by chrs1313
not anything at all really, unless you are a real bad *** driver that m6 is going to be hard to launch and hit all the gears perfectly. autos are faster that is why i got one, haha
, check out my times for proof, only 4 mods, be happy with that auto...
, check out my times for proof, only 4 mods, be happy with that auto...Trending Topics
Originally Posted by ASPZ28
what do you mean 273 auto cars?..what if i have one how do i know?
i just bought a T/A with that ratio and its a dog, definatly gonna change to 3:42's.
95 percent of the time someone can get an a4 to ET faster than an m6 and an a4 is way more consistant, yes an m6 will mph faster than an a4 that is given it is more efficient, but also you have to keep in mind it doesn't matter how efficient it is if you can't put it to the ground...look at the top stock internals times all a4's, stock for stock an a4 with 3.23's will most likely take a m6 from a stop, a roll is a different story.
your 1/4 time will determine whether or not it's a dog. mine ran 14.1 @ 101.5 when it was bone stock. consistent as hell, but slow. i got it to trap 103.78 with a lid, gears, and an overactive shiftkit that was aggrivating the hell out of tqm on the shifts.





