Automatic Transmission 2-Speed thru 10-Speed GM Autos | Converters | Shift Kits
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

ZPAK clutches

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 03-02-2006 | 09:31 PM
  #1  
Red Heartbeat's Avatar
Thread Starter
TECH Apprentice
iTrader: (9)
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 343
Likes: 0
From: Denton, Texas
Default ZPAK clutches

We all know the 3-4 clutch pack is the weak link in the 4L60s. Anyone tried the ZPAK single sided clutches in a high HP/TQ installation? Are they better than the Blue Plate Specials? Their advertisement says thay are perfect for heavy duty work vehicles.
Old 03-02-2006 | 10:50 PM
  #2  
back4more's Avatar
On The Tree
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 103
Likes: 0
From: so cal
Default

Yes and no blue plate specials according to raybestos have a 30% high coeffecient of friction than the leading plate, the z-paks with the x 32 compound are only 20% high coeffecient of friction, however blue plate specials are made for race only enviroments. They are not made for cars with repeated cycling and do alot of down shifting. The z-pak is also made to take alot of heat build up with prolong clutch application like in a hghway enviroment. therefore if you have a street/strip car z pak is better way to go but blue plates are stronger if your going to do primarily racing and very little street.
Old 03-03-2006 | 07:38 AM
  #3  
cablebandit's Avatar
9 Second Club
iTrader: (37)
 
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 7,903
Likes: 1
From: Cleveland, OH
Default

hopefully Dave @ RockOn will chime in. He had me try some Altos...went thru them QUICK. Then he went back to his old standbys...i think the Z-pak. When i broke hard parts, the 3/4 clutches still looked new after 25000 hard street miles and 50 passes locking the converter in 3rd
Old 03-03-2006 | 05:38 PM
  #4  
chevy94c's Avatar
TECH Enthusiast
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 627
Likes: 3
From: Mass
Default

Go with the zpak. You wont regret it.
Old 03-03-2006 | 06:10 PM
  #5  
john kilgore's Avatar
TECH Regular
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 439
Likes: 1
From: burbank ca
Default clutches and steels

just a thought, lf your steels that face the friction plates were as smooth as polished glass how good do you think the traction would be. now if the steel plates were a little rough do you think the frictions would grab better?
Old 03-03-2006 | 08:14 PM
  #6  
Red Heartbeat's Avatar
Thread Starter
TECH Apprentice
iTrader: (9)
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 343
Likes: 0
From: Denton, Texas
Default

Dave's website says he uses the 4L65E Borg/Warner clutch packs in the 3-4 assembly.
Old 03-03-2006 | 08:45 PM
  #7  
cablebandit's Avatar
9 Second Club
iTrader: (37)
 
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 7,903
Likes: 1
From: Cleveland, OH
Default

thats why i said "i think"....i have been wrong before
Old 03-04-2006 | 03:45 AM
  #8  
Automatics's Avatar
Restricted User
 
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 377
Likes: 0
Default

"lf your steels that face the friction plates were as smooth as polished glass how good do you think the traction would be. now if the steel plates were a little rough do you think the frictions would grab better?" No, the clutches have less area to grab when roughing up the steel plates. You want the steels to have a mirror finish if possible. Roughing up the steel plates worked ok when the clutch material was asbestos, and using type "F" fluid, but those days are long gone (late 1977 when last used). The smoother the steel surface is the more clutch area (contact surface) you have, the more holding power. Borg Warner & Raybestos came to this conclusion well over 10 years ago. Remember the fluid is designed (friction modifiers) to help the clutches grab the steel plates. Alto was going to introduce "mirror" finish steels (I was a big proponent of this) a few years back, but could not get the shops to overcome the bad habit of sanding the steels, so they dropped the idea (much to my dismay). Take a look at clutch packs that are in good shape and have well over a 100,000 miles on them, and you will see that the steels have a mirror finish. Raybestos will tell you to reinstall them "as is" as they are wearing perfectly, as long as the clutches have not had a major reduction in thickness (.003" -.005").
Old 03-04-2006 | 03:52 AM
  #9  
cablebandit's Avatar
9 Second Club
iTrader: (37)
 
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 7,903
Likes: 1
From: Cleveland, OH
Default

wow...some awesome tech here!!
Old 03-05-2006 | 05:25 PM
  #10  
Red Heartbeat's Avatar
Thread Starter
TECH Apprentice
iTrader: (9)
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 343
Likes: 0
From: Denton, Texas
Default

Thanks PBA, what is your suggestion for the 3-4 pack? How do you feel about the vacuum modulater vs. the electronic unit?
Old 03-06-2006 | 05:08 AM
  #11  
Automatics's Avatar
Restricted User
 
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 377
Likes: 0
Default

For the 3-4 clutch pack I would use the 8 Clutch Borg Warner Hi-Energy setup. If the HP is over 625, I would use the 9 Clutch Borg Warner Hi-Energy setup. The vacuum modulator is what I use in all of my Performance build ups, as it is very responsive to vacuum changes, and allows for instant downshifts, and allows for more line pressure on the WOT shift into 3rd gear. I have been using it for many years, and it has proved to be very reliable.
Old 03-06-2006 | 05:34 PM
  #12  
slimcracka's Avatar
TECH Fanatic

iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 1,555
Likes: 0
From: pensacola, fl.
Default

damn ok what about a performance rebuild what would be some good parts to throw in then..>?? thanx and sorry to high jack! lol
Old 03-06-2006 | 05:44 PM
  #13  
Rock-On's Avatar
Banned
iTrader: (-2)
 
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 271
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Pro Built Automatics
"lf your steels that face the friction plates were as smooth as polished glass how good do you think the traction would be. now if the steel plates were a little rough do you think the frictions would grab better?" No, the clutches have less area to grab when roughing up the steel plates. You want the steels to have a mirror finish if possible. Roughing up the steel plates worked ok when the clutch material was asbestos, and using type "F" fluid, but those days are long gone (late 1977 when last used). The smoother the steel surface is the more clutch area (contact surface) you have, the more holding power. Borg Warner & Raybestos came to this conclusion well over 10 years ago. Remember the fluid is designed (friction modifiers) to help the clutches grab the steel plates. Alto was going to introduce "mirror" finish steels (I was a big proponent of this) a few years back, but could not get the shops to overcome the bad habit of sanding the steels, so they dropped the idea (much to my dismay). Take a look at clutch packs that are in good shape and have well over a 100,000 miles on them, and you will see that the steels have a mirror finish. Raybestos will tell you to reinstall them "as is" as they are wearing perfectly, as long as the clutches have not had a major reduction in thickness (.003" -.005").

Well said Dana.....we use borgs 4l65E...with 95 thousands steel s and have had excellant results...we didn't have much luck with the z-pacs...I think the bigger issue, than the material for the 3-4's ,is the line pressure that is operating them, and addressing the cavitation problems with these pumps...just my two cents...hope this helps.... Dave
Old 03-06-2006 | 08:28 PM
  #14  
Red Heartbeat's Avatar
Thread Starter
TECH Apprentice
iTrader: (9)
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 343
Likes: 0
From: Denton, Texas
Default

Awesome information, Guys. The vacuum modulation kit intrigues me. How do you handle positive intake pressure from a blower or turbo when you use the vacuum modulation? Wouldn't the positive vs. negative intake pressure cause the module to lessen the pump pressure and then toast the clutches?
Old 03-07-2006 | 01:24 AM
  #15  
Automatics's Avatar
Restricted User
 
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 377
Likes: 0
Default

There is a vacuum bypass valve from Trans-Go for when you use a blower or turbocharger. This prevents positive atmosphere pressure from destroying the vacuum diaphram. You now are at maximum line pressure when this happens.




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:17 PM.