Automatic Transmission 2-Speed thru 10-Speed GM Autos | Converters | Shift Kits
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

Vig3600 that inefficient?

Old Sep 22, 2002 | 11:21 AM
  #1  
12secSS's Avatar
Thread Starter
TECH Junkie
iTrader: (30)
 
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 3,690
Likes: 1
Default Vig3600 that inefficient?

Well, yesterday I went back to the place where I had originally dynoed my car showroom stock. Back in Sept. 15, 2001 it dynoed 312hp/319tq, now after the mods it dynoed 312hp/334tq. <img border="0" title="" alt="[Confused]" src="images/icons/confused.gif" /> My torque graph starts out at 330 @ 4500 rpms and then goes down at a steady rate to 275 @ 6000 rpms. Although my horsepower goes from 280 @ 4500 steadily climbing to 310 @ 6000 rpms. This is the print out of my best run, HP and TQ values are corrected (CR = 1.03):

</font>
  • <font size="2" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">rpms__ HP __ TQ</font></li>
  • <font size="2" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">4100__207.5__265.8</font></li>
  • <font size="2" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">4350__274.9__331.9</font></li>
  • <font size="2" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">4600__290.3__331.4</font></li>
  • <font size="2" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">4850__295.2__319.7</font></li>
  • <font size="2" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">5100__290.6__299.2</font></li>
  • <font size="2" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">5350__301.1__295.6</font></li>
  • <font size="2" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">5600__305.3__286.3</font></li>
  • <font size="2" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">5850__308.0__276.5</font></li>
  • <font size="2" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">6100__310.0__266.9</font></li>
  • <font size="2" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">6350__308.3__255.0</font></li>
<font size="2" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">You can also see the actual dyno graph here.
I am thinking of changing to a Yank (or more efficient converter), either SY4000 or a TP4000, what are your thoughts? Preferrably something that acts like my Vig3600, but pulls better on top. <img border="0" title="" alt="[Big Grin]" src="gr_grin.gif" />

<small>[ September 22, 2002, 11:21 AM: Message edited by: MRZ28HO ]</small>
Reply
Old Sep 22, 2002 | 11:36 AM
  #2  
JNorris's Avatar
Moderator
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 2,074
Likes: 0
From: Montgomery, AL
Default Re: Vig3600 that inefficient?

What are your mods?
Reply
Old Sep 22, 2002 | 11:43 AM
  #3  
12secSS's Avatar
Thread Starter
TECH Junkie
iTrader: (30)
 
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 3,690
Likes: 1
Default Re: Vig3600 that inefficient?

Oh, sorry I thought I had my sig up. <img border="0" title="" alt="[Embarrassed]" src="gr_emb.gif" />

Hypertech Power Programmer III (No tuning)
Fast Toys Ram Air
Holley Power Shot Air Filter
Direct-Flo Air Lid
MAF Translator (Tuned via AutoTAP) 5% Base Lean
SLP Bellows Kit
Throttle Body Coolant Bypass
Ported/Polished Throttle Body
Throttle Body Bump Stop Modification
Hooker Tuned Long Tube Headers
Hooker Off-Road Y-Pipe
Hooker Cat-Back Exhaust
PI Vigilante 3600 Converter
3" Cutout After Y-pipe (first run had the cutout closed, the other two were opened)

<small>[ September 22, 2002, 11:45 AM: Message edited by: MRZ28HO ]</small>
Reply
Old Sep 22, 2002 | 03:46 PM
  #4  
LS1x2's Avatar
Formerly 4mulaJoe
20 Year Member
iTrader: (11)
 
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 2,763
Likes: 0
From: hou
Default Re: Vig3600 that inefficient?

Go to the track and see what it runs. Dynos don't count for much. They are for tuning and bragging rights.
Reply
Old Sep 22, 2002 | 07:35 PM
  #5  
Ragtop 99's Avatar
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 9,491
Likes: 1
From: Bethesda, MD
Default Re: Vig3600 that inefficient?

I ran low 12s with less than 320HP and Raughhammer was in the mid 11s with about 325 HP.

If you want to switch, The YTP 4000 is your choice. Very efficent and a good bottom end hit. SY 4000 is best for badly prepped tracks.
Reply
Old Sep 22, 2002 | 09:49 PM
  #6  
99Z28RS's Avatar
TECH Enthusiast
 
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 612
Likes: 0
From: Northside Rocktown, AR
Default Re: Vig3600 that inefficient?

so the vig3600 is no good????
Reply
Old Sep 22, 2002 | 10:37 PM
  #7  
98TAauto's Avatar
TECH Veteran
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 4,316
Likes: 0
From: Warsaw, Va
Default Re: Vig3600 that inefficient?

i only showed 277hp and 300tq with mine with all bolt ons <img border="0" title="" alt="[Big Grin]" src="gr_grin.gif" /> Bascially they never could dyno the sucker right.. but dynos mean squat... run it at the track and you will be more than happy..

i swear by mine.. price vs perf you cant beat it!!

11's NA(stock) isnt bad for 277hp is it?? <img border="0" title="" alt="[Razz]" src="gr_tounge.gif" />
Reply
Old Sep 22, 2002 | 11:40 PM
  #8  
justin sutton's Avatar
TECH Enthusiast
 
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 731
Likes: 0
From: dyersburg,tn
Default Re: Vig3600 that inefficient?

I have a vig 3200 like it alot.Carry it to the track the only thing that matters is the time slip.
Reply
Old Sep 23, 2002 | 12:09 AM
  #9  
KL20's Avatar
11 Second Club
iTrader: (18)
 
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 454
Likes: 0
From: Garland, Tx
Default Re: Vig3600 that inefficient?

hey MRZ28HO, what are your times w/ your mods? im thinking about getting a vig3600 and wanna know how i might stack up.
Reply
Old Sep 23, 2002 | 07:02 AM
  #10  
12secSS's Avatar
Thread Starter
TECH Junkie
iTrader: (30)
 
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 3,690
Likes: 1
Default Re: Vig3600 that inefficient?

Oh guys, don't get me wrong ... this Vig has proven itself at the track (see my sig), even at my terrible high elevation/desert track. <img border="0" title="" alt="[Big Grin]" src="gr_grin.gif" /> I know dyno numbers mean didly ... but I just expected more. Maybe around the lines of 320hp and an astounding 350tq (based on how it feels). <img border="0" title="" alt="[Confused]" src="images/icons/confused.gif" /> But as I said this thing pulls great at the track. If I can find a deal on a TP4000, I might jump on it. <img border="0" title="" alt="[Smile]" src="gr_stretch.gif" /> Of course that might have to wait until I get my home computer back up and running. <img border="0" title="" alt="[Mad]" src="gr_images/icons/mad.gif" />

Oh, as for my times (best three, the rest are on my site):
Density Altitude = 4157'
ET @ MPH, 60' (On 26x10.5x16 ET Streets)
12.973 @ 103.341, 1.741
12.965 @ 103.754, 1.808
12.897 @ 104.358, 1.792

<small>[ September 23, 2002, 07:05 AM: Message edited by: MRZ28HO ]</small>
Reply
Old Sep 23, 2002 | 07:50 AM
  #11  
Trevor @ Texas Speed & Perf.'s Avatar
LS1Tech Premium Sponsor
20 Year Member
Active Streak: 30 Days
Active Streak: 60 Days
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 4,399
Likes: 5
From: Lubbock, Texas
Default Re: Vig3600 that inefficient?

Torque converters aren't meant to give you nice dyno #'s. They're meant to give you nice 60's and ET's! I dynoed 315 RWHP with all the bolt-ons and a Vig 3200, and it was good for a 12.04 @ 111 MPH with a 1.66 60' and 3,515# raceweight. It doesn't take a ton of power to make an A4 run well. The torque converter is the only part that I know of that will net .5 (or more many times) reduction in the 1/4-mile with no sign of HP on the dyno. This is why the dyno should only be used as a tuning tool. <img border="0" title="" alt="[Smile]" src="gr_stretch.gif" />

Take it to the track with some sticky tires, and I bet you'll be happy with your Vig 3600. <img border="0" title="" alt="[Smile]" src="gr_stretch.gif" />

Trevor
__________________
Reply
Old Sep 23, 2002 | 08:17 AM
  #12  
Ragtop 99's Avatar
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 9,491
Likes: 1
From: Bethesda, MD
Default Re: Vig3600 that inefficient?

</font><blockquote><font size="1" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">quote:</font><hr /><font size="2" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">Originally posted by 99Z28RS:
<strong>so the vig3600 is no good????</strong></font><hr /></blockquote><font size="2" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">It does well at the track and feels pretty tight for a converter with a true stall in the low 4000s. It is not the best choice for racing from a roll.
Reply
Old Sep 23, 2002 | 08:42 AM
  #13  
nysbadmk8's Avatar
TECH Enthusiast
 
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 537
Likes: 2
From: Lehighton Pa
Default Re: Vig3600 that inefficient?

and it plain out sucks when you give it too much power... with my h&c and nitrous it stalls over 6000... and racing from a roll sucks
Reply
Old Sep 23, 2002 | 08:52 AM
  #14  
12secSS's Avatar
Thread Starter
TECH Junkie
iTrader: (30)
 
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 3,690
Likes: 1
Default Re: Vig3600 that inefficient?

</font><blockquote><font size="1" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">quote:</font><hr /><font size="2" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">Originally posted by Ragtop 99:
<strong> </font><blockquote><font size="1" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">quote:</font><hr /><font size="2" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">Originally posted by 99Z28RS:
<strong>so the vig3600 is no good????</strong></font><hr /></blockquote><font size="2" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">It does well at the track and feels pretty tight for a converter with a true stall in the low 4000s. It is not the best choice for racing from a roll.</strong></font><hr /></blockquote><font size="2" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">It's better than I thought, maybe I was too hasty on my judgement. <img border="0" title="" alt="[Big Grin]" src="gr_grin.gif" />

Vig3600 takes an M3
Reply
Old Sep 23, 2002 | 09:03 AM
  #15  
Colonel's Avatar
TECH Senior Member
 
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 9,246
Likes: 3
From: Troy, AL
Default Re: Vig3600 that inefficient?

IMO, the TP4200 would be best for you (that Vig 3600 actually stalls to about 4300, btw.)

The SY4000 will not give you the starting line hit that the Vig or the TP will but it would be an excellent from a roll converter. The TP will give you the same hit (or better) that the Vig gives plus it will be an excellent from a roll converter. Expect your unlocked dyno numbers to take a nice jump.
Reply


Thread Tools
Search this Thread

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:17 AM.