Automotive News, Media & Press Television | Magazines | Industry News

Uh....2011 Mustang V6 goes 13.7@102....

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 03-29-2010, 03:12 PM
  #1  
On The Tree
Thread Starter
 
Firebirdfan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Knoxville, Tennessee
Posts: 185
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default Uh....2011 Mustang V6 goes 13.7@102....

http://www.motortrend.com/roadtests/...#ixzz0jXbjcYA0

Damn. That's quick. Looks like the LS1 may have fallen from grace as head-honcho. Kinda bad when a V6 Mustang can keep up with a bone stock LS1 car. Granted, there's a 10+ year technology difference, but DAMN. Apparently, Ford's doing something right.
Firebirdfan is offline  
Old 03-29-2010, 04:44 PM
  #2  
TECH Enthusiast
 
ThisBlood147's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Louisiana, USA
Posts: 700
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

That's freakin crazy. I was expecting bottom 14's with a pretty good driver......at best. 13 second V6 Mustangs. Guess the world really might end in 2012.
ThisBlood147 is offline  
Old 03-29-2010, 05:13 PM
  #3  
TECH Addict
iTrader: (14)
 
djsanchez2's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Simi Valley, CA.
Posts: 2,727
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Wow i'll have to give it up to them for REALLY REALLY stepping it up this year. Now lets see if GM answers back with a TT-V6 and less weight for the LT and SS.

djsanchez2 is offline  
Old 03-29-2010, 08:41 PM
  #4  
Launching!
 
vtirocz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Indianapolis, IN
Posts: 285
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Amazing numbers for the V6.. I had no idea they were that fast!! Good review on both the V6 and GT overall too.
vtirocz is offline  
Old 03-29-2010, 09:10 PM
  #5  
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (5)
 
Juicy J's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Clear Lake (Houston)
Posts: 665
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

That's wild. I would never have thought a few years ago that Ford would be doing what they are with the Mustang.

13.7 @ 102 isn't all that fast these days, but out of a V6 Mustang, that's pretty damn quick. There are going to be a lot of 16 year old girls getting these, and not knowing what to do with all that power.

I sure hope Ford started a war with this. Competition is what makes cars quicker.
Juicy J is offline  
Old 03-29-2010, 10:53 PM
  #6  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (8)
 
Latch's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Mechanicsville, VA
Posts: 1,444
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Wow, who would have known that a bad economy and high gas prices has led to a horsepower race in the V6 pony car market!

I can't wait to see what Chevy brings to the fight.

Originally Posted by Juicy J
There are going to be a lot of 16 year old girls getting these, and not knowing what to do with all that power.


There's gonna be a lot of wrecked V6 Mustangs in the future...
Latch is offline  
Old 03-30-2010, 12:05 AM
  #7  
TECH Addict
iTrader: (14)
 
djsanchez2's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Simi Valley, CA.
Posts: 2,727
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Chevy is already talking about a TT V6 for the Camaro.
djsanchez2 is offline  
Old 03-30-2010, 12:14 AM
  #8  
10 Second Club
iTrader: (16)
 
LS1LT1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Posts: 9,331
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Thumbs up

Wow that's fast. I expected a mid to low 14 from the car but a magazine time of 13s?! That's potentially a 13.5 in private hands in good air.
It's a good time to be a car guy in America.




Originally Posted by Firebirdfan
Looks like the LS1 may have fallen from grace as head-honcho. Kinda bad when a V6 Mustang can keep up with a bone stock LS1 car.
Well I might not go that far...depending on the air/track conditions a bone stock LS1 F-body will see the high 12s with plenty of them having gone 13.0s-13.3s at over 108+mph (Corvette LS1s have gone 12.6s bone stock). Of course under even more ideal conditions this V6 Mustang might beat that 13.7 as well, but on the same track on the same day with the same driver an LS1 F-body will still have a few tenths over it almost every time.
LS1LT1 is offline  
Old 03-30-2010, 12:38 AM
  #9  
***Repost Police***
 
Irunelevens's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: DFW, TX
Posts: 2,480
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

LT1 guys are gonna start gettin' all butt-hurt
Irunelevens is offline  
Old 03-30-2010, 12:51 AM
  #10  
TECH Regular
 
texas94z's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Keller, Texas
Posts: 458
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by Irunelevens
LT1 guys are gonna start gettin' all butt-hurt
Thats why i rolled out of the opti crowd lol.
texas94z is offline  
Old 03-30-2010, 01:10 AM
  #11  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (1)
 
jmurray87's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Fort Worth, TX
Posts: 1,894
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by djsanchez2
Chevy is already talking about a TT V6 for the Camaro.
They should not need a TT V6 to be faster then the Mustang V6, The Camaro is just to damn heavy and Ford just proves that a lighter car with the same HP performs THAT much better.

Camaro V6 has 1more hp then the Mustang V6 and yet the stang goes 13.7 while camaro is a 14.5.


Major props to Ford, Now lets wait and see what GM pulls out for the 2011 Camaro...to be fair the 2010 Camaro spanks 2010 Mustang..lol
jmurray87 is offline  
Old 03-30-2010, 01:18 AM
  #12  
TECH Veteran
iTrader: (9)
 
King Nothing's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Central Valley
Posts: 4,764
Likes: 0
Received 21 Likes on 19 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Irunelevens
LT1 guys are gonna start gettin' all butt-hurt
and almost all the GT owners for the last 15 years too lol
King Nothing is offline  
Old 03-30-2010, 01:24 AM
  #13  
***Repost Police***
 
Irunelevens's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: DFW, TX
Posts: 2,480
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by King Nothing
and almost all the GT owners for the last 15 years too lol
Oh definitely. But we will see a lot less of that on this site. That, and the fact that LT1 F-bodies have either been right around even with, or just behind Mustang GTs since '99. They've kinda gotten on their own little high-horse. This should humble quite a few people.
Irunelevens is offline  
Old 03-30-2010, 01:28 AM
  #14  
TECH Veteran
iTrader: (9)
 
King Nothing's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Central Valley
Posts: 4,764
Likes: 0
Received 21 Likes on 19 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Irunelevens
Oh definitely. But we will see a lot less of that on this site. That, and the fact that LT1 F-bodies have either been right around even with, or just behind Mustang GTs since '99. They've kinda gotten on their own little high-horse. This should humble quite a few people.
well thankfully i have a LS1 so feel free to rag on LT1's all you want lol every modded LT1 (headers/intake/stall/exhaust) i've run i put a hurting on even when all i had was just LT's and true duals. course in the fall i'd like to see if most cars can keep up lol
King Nothing is offline  
Old 03-30-2010, 01:35 AM
  #15  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (8)
 
Latch's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Mechanicsville, VA
Posts: 1,444
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by King Nothing
and almost all the GT owners for the last 15 years too lol


Ford sure took their sweet time in getting around to making a fast Mustang again.

That being said, I'm loving the numbers this new Mustang is producing, from both the base V6 and the GT's 5.0.
Latch is offline  
Old 03-30-2010, 01:42 AM
  #16  
On The Tree
iTrader: (10)
 
PIZDETS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Tallinn, Google it
Posts: 187
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

That is damn impressive for a V6, however...MT uses corrected numbers so 13.7 will not be an average time like the LS1 cars
PIZDETS is offline  
Old 03-30-2010, 01:46 AM
  #17  
***Repost Police***
 
Irunelevens's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: DFW, TX
Posts: 2,480
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Still a solid 13s car though. And I doubt the trapspeeds are corrected
Irunelevens is offline  
Old 03-30-2010, 01:58 AM
  #18  
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (71)
 
lemons12's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Winchester, TN
Posts: 11,088
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by texas94z
Thats why i rolled out of the opti crowd lol.
94 Z28 totaled
Literally speaking I suppose.




Originally Posted by Irunelevens
Still a solid 13s car though. And I doubt the trapspeeds are corrected
I say a potential 13 car... I wouldn't say solid 13 car yet.. Could be wrong though.
lemons12 is offline  
Old 03-30-2010, 02:05 AM
  #19  
***Repost Police***
 
Irunelevens's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: DFW, TX
Posts: 2,480
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

If Motor Trend can run a 13.7 @ 102mph in a 100% production car, I'd be ashamed if I owned the car and couldn't match it.
Irunelevens is offline  
Old 03-30-2010, 02:06 AM
  #20  
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (71)
 
lemons12's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Winchester, TN
Posts: 11,088
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Irunelevens
If Motor Trend can run a 13.7 @ 102mph in a 100% production car, I'd be ashamed if I owned the car and couldn't match it.
What does it weight? Gearing?
lemons12 is offline  


Quick Reply: Uh....2011 Mustang V6 goes 13.7@102....



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:37 AM.