Automotive News, Media & Press Television | Magazines | Industry News

392 Challenger running 12.4 by dodge (actual video)

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 12-08-2010, 06:38 AM
  #1  
TECH Apprentice
Thread Starter
 
demarco313's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Michigan
Posts: 375
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Talking 392 Challenger running 12.4 by dodge (actual video)

ENJOY

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZFbxZZtywZ0


This is Dodge testing it at the track on 11-10-10. Video was posted on 11-15-10. Sorry just noticed it was never posted on here and im just getting around to it.

I believe it was real low to negative DA and the track has a downhill slope.
(12.4 Definitely wont be real world numbers)


Watch the whole video because at the end you can hear how the car sounds! It sounds like it has an aftermarket cam in it but its a STOCK car. According to Dodge and other sources, the 392 Challenger just barely passes the legal noise level! They really made this thing sound good from the factory!!!

Last edited by demarco313; 12-08-2010 at 06:56 AM.
Old 12-08-2010, 09:04 AM
  #2  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (17)
 
ChaseSS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: St. Louis
Posts: 1,373
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

sounds good, I dig the 392 badges and embroidery on the seats. Do we know what track this is and what the actual temp was?
Old 12-08-2010, 09:23 AM
  #3  
TECH Apprentice
iTrader: (5)
 
k0261886's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Michigan
Posts: 397
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

For once I'm impressed by a Dodge product.
Old 12-08-2010, 12:36 PM
  #4  
10 Second Club
iTrader: (16)
 
LS1LT1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Posts: 9,331
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Thumbs up

Originally Posted by k0261886
For once I'm impressed by a Dodge product.
Well, they did build that other pretty cool car, hmm I think it was called Viper.
I like it too...expensive and heavy yes, but still a strong performing car overall.
Old 12-08-2010, 03:09 PM
  #5  
TECH Apprentice
Thread Starter
 
demarco313's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Michigan
Posts: 375
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by ChaseSS
sounds good, I dig the 392 badges and embroidery on the seats. Do we know what track this is and what the actual temp was?
track was infineon raceway. Not sure on the temp.
Old 12-08-2010, 05:50 PM
  #6  
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (4)
 
ULTIMATEORANGESS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: eatontown,nj
Posts: 10,976
Likes: 0
Received 17 Likes on 15 Posts

Default

it does sound good and looks ok. i was still expecting better than a 12.4 but whatever.
Old 12-08-2010, 06:21 PM
  #7  
***Repost Police***
 
Irunelevens's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: DFW, TX
Posts: 2,480
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

600lbs more than a Mustang GT, 60-70hp more, a smidgen faster... sounds about right to me.
Old 12-08-2010, 06:41 PM
  #8  
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (4)
 
ULTIMATEORANGESS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: eatontown,nj
Posts: 10,976
Likes: 0
Received 17 Likes on 15 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Irunelevens
600lbs more than a Mustang GT, 60-70hp more, a smidgen faster... sounds about right to me.
5th gens have run what? 12.5@113 making less power? for a 6.4 that costs 45k it doesnt add up to me even being heavier.
Old 12-08-2010, 06:51 PM
  #9  
***Repost Police***
 
Irunelevens's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: DFW, TX
Posts: 2,480
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

I assumed that when you said, "i was still expecting better than a 12.4 but whatever," you were talking about what the performance should be based on the specs of the car. Not the performance for the cost.
Old 12-08-2010, 06:53 PM
  #10  
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (4)
 
ULTIMATEORANGESS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: eatontown,nj
Posts: 10,976
Likes: 0
Received 17 Likes on 15 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Irunelevens
I assumed that when you said, "i was still expecting better than a 12.4 but whatever," you were talking about what the performance should be based on the specs of the car. Not the performance for the cost.

i was talking about both. i expect a 470 hp car to run better than that.
Old 12-08-2010, 07:41 PM
  #11  
LS1Tech Administrator
iTrader: (3)
 
RPM WS6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Schiller Park, IL Member: #317
Posts: 32,373
Likes: 0
Received 1,803 Likes on 1,284 Posts
LS1Tech 20 Year Member
Default

I don't think that camming idle at the very end was from the Challenger. Too much audiable overlap in that note to have cats and still pass USEPA tests.
Old 12-09-2010, 01:12 PM
  #12  
Douchebag On The Tree
 
justin455's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Indianapolis, IN
Posts: 1,268
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by RPM WS6
I don't think that camming idle at the very end was from the Challenger. Too much audiable overlap in that note to have cats and still pass USEPA tests.
Especially considering the in video text that read "exhaust audio from nearby staging lane."

Off topic, anyone spot the red LT1 formula?
Old 12-14-2010, 06:18 AM
  #13  
TECH Apprentice
Thread Starter
 
demarco313's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Michigan
Posts: 375
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by RPM WS6
I don't think that camming idle at the very end was from the Challenger. Too much audiable overlap in that note to have cats and still pass USEPA tests.
The original person who filmed the video did indeed confirm that that was the challenger's idle. Not sure if it will sound like that in the production cars though. According to Dodge it just BARELY passed the legal noise level inspection so i dont know.
Old 12-14-2010, 12:39 PM
  #14  
LS1Tech Administrator
iTrader: (3)
 
RPM WS6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Schiller Park, IL Member: #317
Posts: 32,373
Likes: 0
Received 1,803 Likes on 1,284 Posts
LS1Tech 20 Year Member
Default

Originally Posted by demarco313
The original person who filmed the video did indeed confirm that that was the challenger's idle. Not sure if it will sound like that in the production cars though. According to Dodge it just BARELY passed the legal noise level inspection so i dont know.
If that was the Challenger's idle, then I promise you that is not the production model's cam/engine/exhaust (however, I still highly doubt that sound was from the Challenger anyway). Any production car will have to have cats, and for anything with cats to have that much audiable cam lope there would be no way it could pass the USEPA's FTP for motor vehicles.
Old 12-14-2010, 04:55 PM
  #15  
12 Second Club
 
Paul87's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Long Island, NY
Posts: 48
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
LS1Tech 10 Year
Default

I've seen the video before, and the person who provided it stated that it was another car in staging and WAS NOT the Challenger. Notice how later in the video the sound of the cammed vehicle gets quiter while the camera is close to the Challenger and quiter, despite it being loud from a distance at the beginning. As loud as the Challenger is, it it still withing legal threshold and therefore is not going to even be as loud as a lot of catbacks sound...

What it is in the video is purely stock production.
Old 12-15-2010, 11:05 AM
  #16  
TECH Apprentice
Thread Starter
 
demarco313's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Michigan
Posts: 375
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by RPM WS6
If that was the Challenger's idle, then I promise you that is not the production model's cam/engine/exhaust (however, I still highly doubt that sound was from the Challenger anyway). Any production car will have to have cats, and for anything with cats to have that much audiable cam lope there would be no way it could pass the USEPA's FTP for motor vehicles.
Yes i agree with everything you said. Only reason i was skeptical is because the original person that filmed that said it was indeed the 2011 Challenger srt8. He said he also talked to Dodge (the ppl that were testing it at that track) and they said thats how it would sound. But i do agree, its very hard to believe it will sound like that but man would that be awesome lol
Old 12-15-2010, 04:25 PM
  #17  
TECH Enthusiast
 
ThisBlood147's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Louisiana, USA
Posts: 700
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I still think it's kinda sad that Dodge needs its top tier Challenger to compete with GM and Ford's mid-level ponies performance-wise.



Quick Reply: 392 Challenger running 12.4 by dodge (actual video)



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:41 AM.