Automotive News, Media & Press Television | Magazines | Industry News

Spied - 2012 Jeep Grand Cherokee SRT8 392 HEMI

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 02-11-2011, 11:22 PM
  #1  
TECH Veteran
Thread Starter
 
TriShield's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Phoenix, AZ Hometown: Aberdeen, SD
Posts: 4,231
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default Spied - 2012 Jeep Grand Cherokee SRT8 392 HEMI

And this time the exhaust is setup to allow towing.





One of their benchmarks was with them.



It should be unveiled at the New York auto show this year. It's expected to have all the changes and upgrades the new Charger SRT8 has.
Old 02-12-2011, 11:04 PM
  #2  
TECH Veteran
iTrader: (21)
 
1CAMWNDR's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Posts: 4,247
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts

Default

Very nice. I will not be able to afford it; but damn that looks promising.
Old 02-13-2011, 12:10 AM
  #3  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (17)
 
ChaseSS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: St. Louis
Posts: 1,373
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

man that thing looks like its slammed for an SUV, wheels/tires tuck very nicely in the body, not much wheel gap... this jeep could be killer, I'm pumped for more specs
Old 02-13-2011, 02:20 AM
  #4  
TECH Addict
 
It'llrun's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: N. FL
Posts: 2,708
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

They'd draw less attention by just leaving the silly looking bra off the thing and simply leaving badges off as well. It looks good, but most people would instantly mistake it for a modified new GC and move along.
Old 02-13-2011, 08:57 AM
  #5  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (7)
 
turbowhistle86's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: middle of nowhere, IL
Posts: 1,083
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

rumor is the 392 pumps out 465 hp, according to the Mopar reps at the Chicago Auto Show.
Old 02-13-2011, 01:53 PM
  #6  
TECH Addict
 
It'llrun's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: N. FL
Posts: 2,708
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by turbowhistle86
rumor is the 392 pumps out 465 hp, according to the Mopar reps at the Chicago Auto Show.
With the Challenger rated at 470, that makes sense. Prolly the very same engine.
Old 02-13-2011, 02:44 PM
  #7  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (6)
 
NW-99SS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: AB, Canada
Posts: 1,136
Received 170 Likes on 118 Posts

Default

The last SRT8 Jeeps were beasts, this one will be even better no doubt!
Old 02-13-2011, 03:56 PM
  #8  
10 Second Club
iTrader: (16)
 
LS1LT1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Posts: 9,331
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Thumbs up

Originally Posted by NW-99SS
The last SRT8 Jeeps were beasts, this one will be even better no doubt!
I've always loved these trucks.
Old 02-13-2011, 04:47 PM
  #9  
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (4)
 
ULTIMATEORANGESS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: eatontown,nj
Posts: 10,976
Likes: 0
Received 17 Likes on 15 Posts

Default

theyre are nice and i always thought an SRT was the best looking performance SUV but imo theyre too expensive.
Old 02-13-2011, 05:30 PM
  #10  
11 Second Club
iTrader: (24)
 
fast's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Champaign, IL
Posts: 626
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

def on my short (wish) list
Old 02-14-2011, 07:28 AM
  #11  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (7)
 
turbowhistle86's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: middle of nowhere, IL
Posts: 1,083
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

they do bring some serious money for a decent SUV....before you even check the "SRT" box, the V8 Limited is priced about the same as a Yukon.
Old 02-14-2011, 11:35 AM
  #12  
TECH Addict
 
It'llrun's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: N. FL
Posts: 2,708
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

I looked on Jeep .com and the 4X2 Grand Cherokee starts a bit over 30k... That's kinda pricey for a small "mid-size" SUV that doesn't offer a V8, which can be had in all higher trim levels, for about 2k over the additional roughly 4k cost. The 3.6L engine isn't bad really, at 290/260, but still... Pricey. On a brighter note, the Laredo 4X4 starts at just over 32k, which suggests the 4X4 system isn't the money puller it used to be. Like most if not all anymore, it's also only available with an automatic in any version. Like several before it, this one is rather heavy, tipping in at 4660 in base trim.

The Overland package starts at 45,995.00(4X4), but only 42,495(4X2), which makes me wonder one other thing... Why is the 4X4 3.5k in that package, but only 2k in standard trim? Oddly, 4X4 adds 2.5k in Limited trim. I guess the more you're willing to pay for the model, the more the 4X4 system is worth. Anyway... The SRT is going to be way up there, no doubt. I'm thinking 48k or more to start.

It'll be a BLAST to drive, but price will ensure low volume, like all decent or good Chrysler products.
Old 02-14-2011, 11:39 AM
  #13  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (6)
 
NW-99SS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: AB, Canada
Posts: 1,136
Received 170 Likes on 118 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by It'llrun
I looked on Jeep .com and the 4X2 Grand Cherokee starts a bit over 30k... That's kinda pricey for a small "mid-size" SUV that doesn't offer a V8, which can be had in all higher trim levels, for about 2k over the additional roughly 4k cost. The 3.6L engine isn't bad really, at 290/260, but still... Pricey. On a brighter note, the Laredo 4X4 starts at just over 32k, which suggests the 4X4 system isn't the money puller it used to be. Like most if not all anymore, it's also only available with an automatic in any version. Like several before it, this one is rather heavy, tipping in at 4660 in base trim.

The Overland package starts at 45,995.00(4X4), but only 42,495(4X2), which makes me wonder one other thing... Why is the 4X4 3.5k in that package, but only 2k in standard trim? Oddly, 4X4 adds 2.5k in Limited trim. I guess the more you're willing to pay for the model, the more the 4X4 system is worth. Anyway... The SRT is going to be way up there, no doubt. I'm thinking 48k or more to start.

It'll be a BLAST to drive, but price will ensure low volume, like all decent or good Chrysler products.
Addition of skid plates, or different springs shocks in the more expensive packages maybe? Just guessing here.
Old 02-14-2011, 01:07 PM
  #14  
TECH Veteran
Thread Starter
 
TriShield's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Phoenix, AZ Hometown: Aberdeen, SD
Posts: 4,231
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

It costs what SUVs cost today. Vehicles are getting more and more expensive.
Old 02-14-2011, 03:22 PM
  #15  
TECH Addict
 
It'llrun's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: N. FL
Posts: 2,708
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by TriShield
It costs what SUVs cost today. Vehicles are getting more and more expensive.
Idonno... The Equinox starts under 23k and it's about the same size, the Explorer starts just over 28k and is slightly bigger. I guess it's in line somewhere... The Pilot starts at nearly 34k(I'd never pay that), The Hilander is also more, at $33,300.

I do like that they left the GC a RWD... and the base engine is pretty good for power and not bad on torque either. If in the market, I'd be unhappy about the added price for the V8, but otherwise... it's not so bad. The version I'd want(excluding the SRT) is overpriced by about 13k... That's me.



Quick Reply: Spied - 2012 Jeep Grand Cherokee SRT8 392 HEMI



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:26 PM.