Automotive News, Media & Press Television | Magazines | Industry News

Official ZL1 Power Figure and Other Details Released

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 09-10-2011, 08:54 PM
  #21  
TECH Resident
iTrader: (4)
 
gocartone's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Eau Claire-ish, WI
Posts: 853
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by TriShield
I'm a little baffled why anyone would have expected this car to be lighter than an SS, they're adding a big blower, intercooler, plumbing and even bigger wheels/tires... none of which is light.
Didn't GM say it was going to be lighter, or was that just a rumor? Either way I agree, IDK how anyone thought it could have been lighter.

I'm glad they at least got the tire size right! I don't understand how Ford keeps selling the GT500 with such skinny tires on it for a 550hp car, but I don't see the Camaro taking it down with all the extra weight.
Old 09-10-2011, 10:01 PM
  #22  
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (4)
 
ULTIMATEORANGESS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: eatontown,nj
Posts: 10,976
Likes: 0
Received 17 Likes on 15 Posts

Smile

itll probably be the fastest production camaro ever which is great. good thing about FI is its a good way to overcome weight.


i like that suspension and tires made specifically for this car. im anxious to see one in action. the shop i use has one on order.
Old 09-11-2011, 10:44 AM
  #23  
Launching!
 
MI-Z/28's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Earth
Posts: 289
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by TriShield
A huge part of the weight in these cars is the 20" wheels/tires covering those big brakes. I believe all Camaros already have aluminum hoods and other parts to offset that somewhat.

I'm a little baffled why anyone would have expected this car to be lighter than an SS, they're adding a big blower, intercooler, plumbing and even bigger wheels/tires... none of which is light.
I never thought it was going to be lighter. I expected it to weigh 4000+lbs. I'm just thinking out loud because I had heard that the ZL1 would be utilizing more light weight parts than the SS to help keep the weight increase to a minimum.
Old 09-11-2011, 12:27 PM
  #24  
***Repost Police***
 
Irunelevens's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: DFW, TX
Posts: 2,480
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

4,200lbs is too heavy for a performance coupe. My four door Nissan Frontier weighed that much.
Old 09-11-2011, 02:50 PM
  #25  
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (12)
 
KW4life06's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Cedar Rapids, IA
Posts: 534
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Wasn't the suspension/handling designed and tuned by the same engineers as the zr1? I'm sure this thing will be able to manage its weight in the corners if so.
Old 09-11-2011, 02:52 PM
  #26  
***Repost Police***
 
Irunelevens's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: DFW, TX
Posts: 2,480
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

The ZR1 weighs a thousand pounds less almost
Old 09-11-2011, 03:04 PM
  #27  
TECH Fanatic
 
TransAmWS.6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Maryland
Posts: 1,313
Received 9 Likes on 8 Posts

Default

I'm a little disappointed at how much it weighs, but I think it's going to make the most of what it's got given the technology that it has into it. I think it should perform pretty decent for how big of a car it is.
Old 09-11-2011, 03:07 PM
  #28  
***Repost Police***
 
Irunelevens's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: DFW, TX
Posts: 2,480
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

I'm sure it will, but given the choice between two cars that are similar in raw performance numbers, I will always choose the lighter of the two.
Old 09-11-2011, 03:11 PM
  #29  
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (12)
 
KW4life06's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Cedar Rapids, IA
Posts: 534
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Yes but the CTSv weighs more, and even though its a big car seems to hold the track pretty well.
Old 09-11-2011, 03:14 PM
  #30  
***Repost Police***
 
Irunelevens's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: DFW, TX
Posts: 2,480
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

It weighs like thirty pounds more. I will always take the lighter car because of how it FEELS, which is at least as important as the raw numbers to me.
Old 09-11-2011, 04:56 PM
  #31  
Restricted User
iTrader: (12)
 
z99ls1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: kansas
Posts: 1,794
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

It is simplly not going to weigh 4200 lbs. 7.24 is probably off of the rwhp wich would have it at about 3800 lbs. They cut 22 lbs off each wheel/tire on the car and the chief engineer said himself one of the bigest things they are working on now is getting rid of weight.
Old 09-11-2011, 04:59 PM
  #32  
***Repost Police***
 
Irunelevens's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: DFW, TX
Posts: 2,480
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

You are on crack if you think that car is going to weigh 3800lbs. The weight savings was to make sure it didn't end up weighing as much as a Tahoe.
Old 09-11-2011, 06:06 PM
  #33  
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (4)
 
ULTIMATEORANGESS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: eatontown,nj
Posts: 10,976
Likes: 0
Received 17 Likes on 15 Posts

Default

it really is too heavy. thats one thing i cant defend here.


challengers are hogs and so are camaros.


they make gt500s look like lightweights.
Old 09-11-2011, 06:42 PM
  #34  
Launching!
 
MI-Z/28's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Earth
Posts: 289
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by z99ls1
It is simplly not going to weigh 4200 lbs. 7.24 is probably off of the rwhp wich would have it at about 3800 lbs.
So you think it's putting down 525rwhp? I sure don't.
Old 09-11-2011, 06:55 PM
  #35  
Staging Lane
iTrader: (1)
 
Tee1up's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 51
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

So is this 580 hp for the manual and automatic transmission or just one or the other?
Old 09-11-2011, 06:59 PM
  #36  
Launching!
 
MI-Z/28's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Earth
Posts: 289
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Tee1up
So is this 580 hp for the manual and automatic transmission or just one or the other?
Transmission choice does not affect crank horsepower. Both will be rated at 580. The manual will make more rwhp. The factories do not rate vehicles at rwhp.
Old 09-11-2011, 07:05 PM
  #37  
TECH Fanatic
 
TransAmWS.6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Maryland
Posts: 1,313
Received 9 Likes on 8 Posts

Default

The A6 ZL1's are going to be very stout I bet, going to be a killer setup for the straight line guys. It really is too bad Ford doesn't offer the GT500 in an Auto.
Old 09-11-2011, 07:08 PM
  #38  
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (4)
 
ULTIMATEORANGESS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: eatontown,nj
Posts: 10,976
Likes: 0
Received 17 Likes on 15 Posts

Default

one of the best decisions made here was to offer an auto.
Old 09-11-2011, 07:37 PM
  #39  
TECH Enthusiast
 
JHL88's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: SC
Posts: 535
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by ULTIMATEORANGESS
one of the best decisions made here was to offer an auto.
agreed.
Old 09-11-2011, 08:04 PM
  #40  
TECH Addict
 
It'llrun's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: N. FL
Posts: 2,708
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by ULTIMATEORANGESS
it really is too heavy. thats one thing i cant defend here.


challengers are hogs and so are camaros.


they make gt500s look like lightweights.
The new, lighter version of the GT500 still tips the scales around 3750... That's not light, even though the others still weigh more.

The GT500 should be offered with an automatic. I'm thinking Ford will bring that around by 2015 or maybe even before their next makeover.


Quick Reply: Official ZL1 Power Figure and Other Details Released



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:41 PM.