Official 2013 GT500 662hp Ford Press Release
#201
![Default](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Dyno... 609rwhp
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zz9Uqg0xbm4
MT 11.6@125.7 0-60 3.5sec
http://www.motortrend.com/roadtests/...00_first_test/
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zz9Uqg0xbm4
MT 11.6@125.7 0-60 3.5sec
http://www.motortrend.com/roadtests/...00_first_test/
#203
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (2)
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Bay Area, California
Posts: 1,677
Likes: 0
Received 8 Likes
on
6 Posts
![](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/ranks/ls1tech10year.png)
![Default](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Dyno... 609rwhp
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zz9Uqg0xbm4
MT 11.6@125.7 0-60 3.5sec
http://www.motortrend.com/roadtests/...00_first_test/
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zz9Uqg0xbm4
MT 11.6@125.7 0-60 3.5sec
http://www.motortrend.com/roadtests/...00_first_test/
Last edited by DoggyB22; 05-21-2012 at 03:09 AM.
#206
***Repost Police***
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: DFW, TX
Posts: 2,480
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
![](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/ranks/ls1tech10year.png)
![Default](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Call outs? Wtf are you talking about? On-topic, 11.6 from Motor Trend is mighty impressive. An 11.1-11.3 from an experienced owner in better conditions is sounding more and more plausible.
#207
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (5)
![Default](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
http://jalopnik.com/5911657/first-dr...ium=socialflow
Jalopnik review...
I'm a GM guy and I like the ZL1, however, Ford deffinetly put a lead on this "muscle car competition" for awhile. Chevy's isn't going to bounce back as fast as Ford did (for those who don't know, Ford announced this car a day after Chevy announced the ZL1)
If I were to pick between the two, it'd deffinetly be the GT500, especially since the ZL1 costs almost the same amount of money
Jalopnik review...
I'm a GM guy and I like the ZL1, however, Ford deffinetly put a lead on this "muscle car competition" for awhile. Chevy's isn't going to bounce back as fast as Ford did (for those who don't know, Ford announced this car a day after Chevy announced the ZL1)
If I were to pick between the two, it'd deffinetly be the GT500, especially since the ZL1 costs almost the same amount of money
#210
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (6)
![Default](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Subjectively, it's not a car I really want. Objectively, it's the pony to have if you want to go fast in a straight line. Handling, well ride and handling are again subjective, I would have to put seat time in to make this decision (as would everyone else I expect).
So it took two weeks to run 9s with a ZL1, who wants to take bets on how long till this beast gets there? (A week, just to put the war back in GM hands?) Have to commend Ford on a fantastic job for those who want Shelby Mustangs!
So it took two weeks to run 9s with a ZL1, who wants to take bets on how long till this beast gets there? (A week, just to put the war back in GM hands?) Have to commend Ford on a fantastic job for those who want Shelby Mustangs!
#211
TECH Veteran
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Phoenix, AZ Hometown: Aberdeen, SD
Posts: 4,231
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
![](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/ranks/ls1tech10year.png)
#214
![Lightbulb](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon3.gif)
And which is pretty much what I'd been predicting (I've been saying 11.2/11.3ish) all along, although I'd never expected to see it pull a 129mph
![Icon Eek](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/smilies2/icon_eek.gif)
That car frightens me LOL.
And yes, it will go high 10s in decent air with just a rear tire swap.
#215
![Default](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
THEY tested it with everything on it? don't forget, ford options all the track stuff onto this.....which on one hand, i fully understand....on the other, i think it's kinda cheesy......
#216
***Repost Police***
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: DFW, TX
Posts: 2,480
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
![](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/ranks/ls1tech10year.png)
![Default](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
I'd have to agree.
And which is pretty much what I'd been predicting (I've been saying 11.2/11.3ish) all along, although I'd never expected to see it pull a 129mph
trap speed on stock tires (if that's in fact true).
That car frightens me LOL.
And yes, it will go high 10s in decent air with just a rear tire swap.
And which is pretty much what I'd been predicting (I've been saying 11.2/11.3ish) all along, although I'd never expected to see it pull a 129mph
![Icon Eek](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/smilies2/icon_eek.gif)
That car frightens me LOL.
And yes, it will go high 10s in decent air with just a rear tire swap.
#217
![Default](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Possibly, with the typical weight reduction tricks and full bolt ons/tuning, there is a chance of a 9.99.
#219
TECH Resident
iTrader: (4)
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Eau Claire-ish, WI
Posts: 853
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
![](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/ranks/ls1tech10year.png)
![Default](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
http://www.insideline.com/chevrolet/...full-test.html
129mph is moving! Just imagine what this thing will do in negative DA (DA for the test day was somewhere between 2000-2500, plus every magazine running back to back to back tests on them).