1ltcap

the gt's are 1-1 in 5th. 6th is overdrive. i'll find and post spec sheet soon as i eat.

ok......2012 gt manual.....
TRANSMISSION
Standard Six-speed manual
Gear ratios
First 3.66
Second 2.43
Third 1.69
Fourth 1.32
Fifth 1.00
Sixth 0.65
Final drive 3.31:1
you all know that there's other rear gears available on them.....

2012 gt automatic....
Optional Six-speed automatic
Gear ratios
First 4.17
Second 2.34
Third 1.52
Fourth 1.14
Fifth 0.87
Sixth 0.69
Final drive 3.15:1

2013 gt500 tremec.....
Standard
Tremec TR6060 six-speed manual Gear ratios
First
2.66
Second
1.82
Third
1.30
Fourth
1.00
Fifth
0.77
Sixth
0.50
Final drive
3.31:1

Sax1031

same day and same dyno. ZL1 and 13 GT500

http://youtu.be/yZBKBf8Zsjo

1ltcap

torque 603@3900rpm.....that right there will hammer the zl1 every time, as long as the shelby can plant it. also, noticed it sounds a LOT better, and revs more freely.

firebird99

iTrader: (2)

Other then the .4 liter difference I wonder how the motors would compare with the same size blower and boost levels.

LS1LT1

iTrader: (16)

True. But even if they made the same power the Mustang would still have the advantage based on curb weight alone. Factor in the notable power differences and it's quite clear that in any straight line contest the win goes to the GT500 (if driven properly of course).

DoggyB22

iTrader: (2)

Guess someone ran 11.28 @ 128 with just drag radials, and a 11.8 @ 123 bone stock. No high 10 sec pass.......... But not to bad!


This... Like I've been saying the weight is KILLING the ZL1. But Id also like to see what the ZL1 would put down with a different blower & same boost.



This confirmed?? Any idea of hp/tq?

SSCamaro99_3

iTrader: (1)

Probably a set of rods and pistons.

1ltcap

if only the shelby weighed less, then it would be comparable to the vette.

sheesh....now I'M doing it........

Orr89rocz

iTrader: (13)

Ahh thanks for the info. I was thinkin of the GT 5.0 auto trans that had abit more than 1 ratio for 4th and abit more than a OD for 5th.

Still, its moving some rpm at 141 mph with those gears

firebird99

iTrader: (2)

Do you do anything else besides wait for a chance to throw jabs at the ZL1 or comments about the car that don't already attempt to down grade it?

1ltcap

where did i jab at the zl1? or downgrade it? in case you missed it, i'm jabbing at all the guys that use the "it's too heavy" argument.

here....i'll help ya, since you're being obtuse......

https://ls1tech.com/forums/automotiv...amaro-zl1.html
reply #10;.

chaman

iTrader: (5)

Im dying to see what the fanboys will come up with after seeing this...

chaman

iTrader: (5)

You should read your signature again....boy, oh boy.

1ltcap

it's too heavy.

badazz81z28

iTrader: (6)

Doesnt it seem like the ZL1 loses alot of power though the drivetrain? Only 497 to the wheels?

People here claim close to that with N/A 346 cubes....

firebird99

iTrader: (2)

Really how does that pertain to the question I asked him? Also how does it pertain to any of my response's I've always talked good about both cars just wondering why the "ford" guys spend so much time on a GM based site.

Sax1031

IRS

edit: apparently IRS is to short of a message to post.

1ltcap

because some of us "ford guys" like pretty much anything american, v8 powered, and fast. i thought you'd get that by now.......

DoggyB22

iTrader: (2)

Does anyone know what the hp/tq numbers were for the 10 sec GT500?

Sax1031

No not yet

We don't even know for sure what the mods were.

We have to wait for the magazine to publish the article.