Automotive News, Media & Press Television | Magazines | Industry News

ZL1 Wins overall vs new GT500

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 06-18-2012, 09:45 PM
  #201  
Staging Lane
 
89ThirdGenCamaro3310's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Posts: 97
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Bsaint
Flame me all you want...

But if I was to buy either, I think I'd still buy the GT-500. But would rather have the Boss 302 LS.

Got to drive one for the day and at the track and It has to be the best car Ford has produced in a VERY long time. First "Drivers" car the way it felt.
Hell yea and the Forged internals are just begging to be supercharged. This setup would prob be the more budget friendly way to go to compete and surpass both the ZL1 and GT500.
Old 06-18-2012, 09:48 PM
  #202  
TECH Resident
 
1ltcap's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: NJ
Posts: 812
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by 89ThirdGenCamaro3310
Just curious what you meant by this, my FI knowledge is limited. So what you mean is that it takes more power to turn the 2.3 than the 1.9 correct? So would that mean the 1.9 can overcome the size advantage of the 2.3? Just not sure i am following you correctly.
no. what i mean is that the bigger supercharger is on a smaller displacement engine, and the smaller supercharger is on a bigger displacement engine.

an engine is nothing more than a big, hot, loud(preferably) air pump.

BTW..i'm not meaning to sound like a dick.......
Old 06-18-2012, 10:02 PM
  #203  
Staging Lane
 
89ThirdGenCamaro3310's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Posts: 97
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by 1ltcap
no. what i mean is that the bigger supercharger is on a smaller displacement engine, and the smaller supercharger is on a bigger displacement engine.

an engine is nothing more than a big, hot, loud(preferably) air pump.

BTW..i'm not meaning to sound like a dick.......
ahh ok gotcha thanks for clarifying thought you were talking about actual part of the blowers. Would the old adage of "no replacement for displacement" be null here since these motors are FI? For example the Toyota 2JZ motor is known to easily break 1khp. Would .4L or i think its like 7percent really make that much of a difference?
Old 06-18-2012, 10:05 PM
  #204  
TECH Resident
 
1ltcap's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: NJ
Posts: 812
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by 89ThirdGenCamaro3310
ahh ok gotcha thanks for clarifying thought you were talking about actual part of the blowers. Would the old adage of "no replacement for displacement" be null here since these motors are FI? For example the Toyota 2JZ motor is known to easily break 1khp. Would .4L or i think its like 7percent really make that much of a difference?
most likely not to be honest. and there still is no replacement for displacement, for the most part.

remember.....the engine is just a biiig air pump. the more air it can move, the more hp it can make.
Old 06-18-2012, 10:51 PM
  #205  
10 Second Club
iTrader: (16)
 
LS1LT1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Posts: 9,331
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Thumbs up

Originally Posted by Redfire 03
As for the ZR1 running those numbers in Neg. DA, I recently watched Brent (916 BREDWNR) run his bone-stock ZR1 to 11.1@130 in the 92* heat. His best DR-only time is 10.69 in +580ft. Some good negative DA plus the driver mod can get you mid to high 10s and 132-134 traps in those things. Crazy
10.26@135+ actually.
Stock C6 ZR1 with drag radials:

Old 06-19-2012, 02:07 AM
  #206  
On The Tree
 
proxemics's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: saudi arabia
Posts: 180
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

So the ZL1 crowd will use the twisty excuse every time they lose a race?
That does remind me of something!!!
Old 06-19-2012, 02:48 AM
  #207  
Staging Lane
 
89ThirdGenCamaro3310's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Posts: 97
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by proxemics
So the ZL1 crowd will use the twisty excuse every time they lose a race?
That does remind me of something!!!
doubt it, its already proven the 2013 GT500 is faster. Unless you have been living under a rock everyone knows the GT500 owns the 1/4 currently.
Old 06-19-2012, 07:47 AM
  #208  
TECH Resident
 
1ltcap's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: NJ
Posts: 812
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by 89ThirdGenCamaro3310
doubt it, its already proven the 2013 GT500 is faster. Unless you have been living under a rock everyone knows the GT500 owns the 1/4 currently.
the 1/4, 0-60, 0-100, 0-150, top speed, 60-0 fuel mileage, and i'd be willing to bet that someone with any sort of clue in one of them will easily produce equal skidpad numbers to the zl.
Old 06-19-2012, 12:29 PM
  #209  
Launching!
 
Redfire 03's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Greenhaven/ South Sacramento 'Burbs
Posts: 203
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by 1ltcap
yes, but the air pump that that bigger more efficient 2.3 is bolted to is smaller than the air pump that the smaller 1.9 is bolted to.
That smaller "air pump" also has four camshaft's and four valves per cylinder. Besides, the efficiency of the Eaton 2.3L is on an entirely different level compared to the smaller 1.9L, and easily negates the minimal 22 cu. in. advantage the LSA has over the 5.8L 4v.
Old 06-19-2012, 12:35 PM
  #210  
Launching!
 
Redfire 03's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Greenhaven/ South Sacramento 'Burbs
Posts: 203
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by LS1LT1
10.26@135+ actually.
Stock C6 ZR1 with drag radials:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3SIRFJKgs6c
I have got to get one of those in my garage one day.
Old 06-19-2012, 01:06 PM
  #211  
TECH Resident
 
1ltcap's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: NJ
Posts: 812
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Redfire 03
That smaller "air pump" also has four camshaft's and four valves per cylinder. Besides, the efficiency of the Eaton 2.3L is on an entirely different level compared to the smaller 1.9L, and easily negates the minimal 22 cu. in. advantage the LSA has over the 5.8L 4v.
sop wait? you're saying that fords airpump is better than chevys?
Old 06-19-2012, 01:48 PM
  #212  
Launching!
iTrader: (4)
 
strokerblackhawk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Houston, Texas
Posts: 273
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

lol this **** is funny as hell. the cars are close. ford stepped it up at the last minute and kinda caught gm with their pants down. lets see what gm does next id love to see them match the hp and beat them in a heavier car but right now that 13 gt 500 is no joke i love gm and ford but fords new power plants made this muscle car war closer which im all for. door to door racing is fun and im glad ford stepped it up now its gm's turn which is good for us because now we have faster cars to play with isn't that what its about anyway..... puppy kicking a 2v just wasn't very much fun.... what i wanna know is where the **** is dodge in all this, better strap a blower to that 392!!!
Old 06-19-2012, 02:11 PM
  #213  
Launching!
 
Redfire 03's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Greenhaven/ South Sacramento 'Burbs
Posts: 203
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by 1ltcap
sop wait? you're saying that fords airpump is better than chevys?
Nooo just not at as much of an disadvantage as some claim that's all.

Originally Posted by strokerblackhawk
lol this **** is funny as hell. the cars are close. ford stepped it up at the last minute and kinda caught gm with their pants down. lets see what gm does next id love to see them match the hp and beat them in a heavier car but right now that 13 gt 500 is no joke i love gm and ford but fords new power plants made this muscle car war closer which im all for. door to door racing is fun and im glad ford stepped it up now its gm's turn which is good for us because now we have faster cars to play with isn't that what its about anyway..... puppy kicking a 2v just wasn't very much fun.... what i wanna know is where the **** is dodge in all this, better strap a blower to that 392!!!
Not close at all. The Mustang has it beat by a good margin. Good being an understatement. lol
Old 06-19-2012, 02:48 PM
  #214  
Launching!
iTrader: (4)
 
strokerblackhawk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Houston, Texas
Posts: 273
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Redfire 03
Nooo just not at as much of an disadvantage as some claim that's all.



Not close at all. The Mustang has it beat by a good margin. Good being an understatement. lol
i was being nice...lol
Old 06-19-2012, 02:50 PM
  #215  
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (1)
 
Theblacknightls1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: San Antonio ,TX
Posts: 559
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

Originally Posted by strokerblackhawk
lol this **** is funny as hell. the cars are close. ford stepped it up at the last minute and kinda caught gm with their pants down. lets see what gm does next id love to see them match the hp and beat them in a heavier car but right now that 13 gt 500 is no joke i love gm and ford but fords new power plants made this muscle car war closer which im all for. door to door racing is fun and im glad ford stepped it up now its gm's turn which is good for us because now we have faster cars to play with isn't that what its about anyway..... puppy kicking a 2v just wasn't very much fun.... what i wanna know is where the **** is dodge in all this, better strap a blower to that 392!!!
I think the 392 can hold its own compare to the zl1 and it does it all motor.
Old 06-19-2012, 03:10 PM
  #216  
TECH Resident
 
1ltcap's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: NJ
Posts: 812
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Redfire 03
Nooo just not at as much of an disadvantage as some claim that's all.



Not close at all. The Mustang has it beat by a good margin. Good being an understatement. lol
excellently played sir.
Old 06-19-2012, 03:45 PM
  #217  
TECH Resident
iTrader: (4)
 
gocartone's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Eau Claire-ish, WI
Posts: 853
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Redfire 03
Not close at all. The Mustang has it beat by a good margin. Good being an understatement. lol
The ZL1 is pretty close to the 2011/2012 GT500, but it still has some catching up to do
Old 06-19-2012, 06:24 PM
  #218  
Staging Lane
 
89ThirdGenCamaro3310's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Posts: 97
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by 1ltcap
the 1/4, 0-60, 0-100, 0-150, top speed, 60-0 fuel mileage, and i'd be willing to bet that someone with any sort of clue in one of them will easily produce equal skidpad numbers to the zl.
Yea maybe, but i honestly dont think in stock trim the GT500 has enough tire to surpass the ZL1 on the skid pad. The best we have seen is .98? to the ZL's 1.03(Insideline) Someone correct me if im wrong im just going off the top of my head. With an aftermarket set of wheels and tires i think it can def match or surpass a stock ZL on the skid pad. But i do recall the Ford engineers saying the reason they didnt go with the bigger tire in the rear was due to it causing the car to under steer.

Last edited by 89ThirdGenCamaro3310; 06-19-2012 at 06:40 PM.
Old 06-19-2012, 06:53 PM
  #219  
Staging Lane
 
89ThirdGenCamaro3310's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Posts: 97
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by strokerblackhawk
lol this **** is funny as hell. the cars are close. ford stepped it up at the last minute and kinda caught gm with their pants down. lets see what gm does next id love to see them match the hp and beat them in a heavier car but right now that 13 gt 500 is no joke i love gm and ford but fords new power plants made this muscle car war closer which im all for. door to door racing is fun and im glad ford stepped it up now its gm's turn which is good for us because now we have faster cars to play with isn't that what its about anyway..... puppy kicking a 2v just wasn't very much fun.... what i wanna know is where the **** is dodge in all this, better strap a blower to that 392!!!
Would be nice to see some Mopar action mixing it up.
Old 06-19-2012, 06:57 PM
  #220  
TECH Resident
 
1ltcap's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: NJ
Posts: 812
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by 89ThirdGenCamaro3310
Yea maybe, but i honestly dont think in stock trim the GT500 has enough tire to surpass the ZL1 on the skid pad. The best we have seen is .98? to the ZL's 1.03(Insideline) Someone correct me if im wrong im just going off the top of my head. With an aftermarket set of wheels and tires i think it can def match or surpass a stock ZL on the skid pad. But i do recall the Ford engineers saying the reason they didnt go with the bigger tire in the rear was due to it causing the car to under steer.
The plain old gt i think is rated at .98. that should be a little telling right there. if you google 2012 shelby gt500 at vir, you'llfind a good video of the 2012 that ran last year. note the g-meter on it. it tops 1.1 a couple of times. supposedlhy that car was stock, but i don't know for sure.

the skidpad isn't the end all\be all for handling. you need to get out on the track for that, like they did vs the boss302.

almost forgot......1.03 to .98.........miniscule difference. like truly not worth mentioning.


Quick Reply: ZL1 Wins overall vs new GT500



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:59 PM.