Media Leaks - The Real 2015 Ford Mustang
#101
TECH Regular
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Jacksonville, FL
Posts: 443
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
![Default](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
oh my someone disagrees with Irunelevens and chaman... theyre all idiots.
the styling cues are completely subjective. ever wonder why people see different images with the rorschach tests?
jesus, fanboys get butt hurt fast on this topic
the styling cues are completely subjective. ever wonder why people see different images with the rorschach tests?
jesus, fanboys get butt hurt fast on this topic
#102
TECH Resident
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: Miami, FL
Posts: 965
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
![Default](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Its going around on several LS groups and pages. I didn't know it was impossible for intelligent people to use Facebook. I also didn't know an opinion on car is what measures intelligence.
#103
TECH Regular
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Jacksonville, FL
Posts: 443
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
![Default](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
more importantly your opinion on which styling cues measures your intelligence. i get it those two CLEARLY like this new mustang but we all dont have to drink the koolaid.
#104
![Default](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Actually im reffering to the Honda pick the sick tight put on every thread about the new mustang it looks a lot like that FROM THE SIDE. I also sent multiple comments because well i can yes i know i could of broken your ignorant opinionated reply back but why when i like adding fuel to the fire. I also understand what Ford is and what they have done granted they have come a long way from the 90's anf early 2000's but the fact remains that 4.6L was garbage compared to the LS1/6 that GM used and it still is. Now GM/Chevy is on the ropes because the mustang is lighter and is putting out the same if not more power and that new eco-boost motor is not to be taken lightly because in the racing scene it has done very well in rally that is. Hell in Top Gear America they put it around their track and it beat a Viper ACR-X. So to say im misinformed or ignorant or uneducated about "cars" is false i choose to stir the pot because after all this is a GM fan base website not a Ford fan base website and liking either car is based on one's opinion but how fast a car can go depends on the motor (cubic inches) and how much the owner can spend and thats not an opinion that's a fact.
Engines(not motors) aside, as you're obviously clueless about engines, the 2015 Mustang looks like... A MUSTANG! It doesn't look like a Honda, but it strongly resembles Mustangs from far before your time, somewhat explaining the issue here...
I think it's actually a '66. I agree though, after just actually looking at it, not a '67.
![Icon Lol](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/smilies2/icon_lol.gif)
![Icon Lol](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/smilies2/icon_lol.gif)
Lol I see the resemblance and I agree with you on that, but I think it still carries too much of the modern typical jap/euro sporty look. Nothing unique about it, and I think thats a terrible thing. It definitely does not "scream Mustang". Call me a fanbooy if you want but I love a nice Terminator or foxbody as much as any Ford guy. The Accord meme is going all around Facebook and tons of other people agree, if not for the wheels/brakes, and back side of the car they would look very very much alike.
Btw, the terminator and Fox body were clear departures from "screaming Mustang" as it was... They're the versions furthest from the original.
#105
***Repost Police***
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: DFW, TX
Posts: 2,480
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
![](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/ranks/ls1tech10year.png)
![Default](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Lol I see the resemblance and I agree with you on that, but I think it still carries too much of the modern typical jap/euro sporty look. Nothing unique about it, and I think thats a terrible thing. It definitely does not "scream Mustang". Call me a fanbooy if you want but I love a nice Terminator or foxbody as much as any Ford guy. The Accord meme is going all around Facebook and tons of other people agree, if not for the wheels/brakes, and back side of the car they would look very very much alike.
#106
TECH Regular
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Jacksonville, FL
Posts: 443
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
![Default](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
to be honest i think the foxbodies looked like escorts. the sn95s looked plain jane and the first mustangs i really liked were the new 11+ mustangs (obviously i loved the first gen mustangs). but again thats my personal opinion, crazy how people can have those.
#107
***Repost Police***
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: DFW, TX
Posts: 2,480
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
![](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/ranks/ls1tech10year.png)
![Default](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Right. But saying "it doesn't look like a Mustang" is ridiculous. And complaining about it being "too Euro" is equally ridiculous, especially if the person saying that has a Corvette. That car was developed with the sole purpose of emulating British sports cars, and the C7 is certainly taking more of a "euro" turn. I'm just saying, call a spade a spade.
#108
TECH Regular
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Jacksonville, FL
Posts: 443
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
![Default](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Right. But saying "it doesn't look like a Mustang" is ridiculous. And complaining about it being "too Euro" is equally ridiculous, especially if the person saying that has a Corvette. That car was developed with the sole purpose of emulating British sports cars, and the C7 is certainly taking more of a "euro" turn. I'm just saying, call a spade a spade.
#110
TECH Regular
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Jacksonville, FL
Posts: 443
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
![Default](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
i havent said it looks like anything euro, i personally dont care if they went "euro" i did say it looks like a BRZ/Fusion and the side profile looked like a honda accord as well.
so who is the corvette owner you speak of? i actually have been praising this car more than anything with its light weight IRS and possible beefy power plant. no i am not a fan of the styling but because it doesnt look good or looks like you vehicles i stated.
i am not surprised to have more people not a fan of a ford mustang on this site, just like if i were on a mustang site watching comments on the new camaro. why do people not get this. this isnt "musclecartech.com" or "americancartech.net"
#111
Banned
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: chattanooga Tn
Posts: 1,352
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
![Default](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Look at the pics and tell me that they are not very similar. Its a Mustang with a modern touch, nothing wrong with that. I dont hate the new Cowmaro (not a typo), I dont care for it at all. Im expecting a radical change, for the better, with the new Camaro.
#112
Banned
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: chattanooga Tn
Posts: 1,352
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
![Default](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Actually im reffering to the Honda pick the sick tight put on every thread about the new mustang it looks a lot like that FROM THE SIDE. I also sent multiple comments because well i can yes i know i could of broken your ignorant opinionated reply back but why when i like adding fuel to the fire. I also understand what Ford is and what they have done granted they have come a long way from the 90's anf early 2000's but the fact remains that 4.6L was garbage compared to the LS1/6 that GM used and it still is. Now GM/Chevy is on the ropes because the mustang is lighter and is putting out the same if not more power and that new eco-boost motor is not to be taken lightly because in the racing scene it has done very well in rally that is. Hell in Top Gear America they put it around their track and it beat a Viper ACR-X. So to say im misinformed or ignorant or uneducated about "cars" is false i choose to stir the pot because after all this is a GM fan base website not a Ford fan base website and liking either car is based on one's opinion but how fast a car can go depends on the motor (cubic inches) and how much the owner can spend and thats not an opinion that's a fact.
Engines(not motors) aside, as you're obviously clueless about engines, the 2015 Mustang looks like... A MUSTANG! It doesn't look like a Honda, but it strongly resembles Mustangs from far before your time, somewhat explaining the issue here...
I think it's actually a '66. I agree though, after just actually looking at it, not a '67.
![Icon Lol](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/smilies2/icon_lol.gif)
![Icon Lol](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/smilies2/icon_lol.gif)
So, Mustang had the look it has, only 50yrs ago and since other cars, most(all) of which weren't even invented when the Mustang was introduced, the Mustang is now "copying" the others. Got it.
Btw, the terminator and Fox body were clear departures from "screaming Mustang" as it was... They're the versions furthest from the original.
![Happy](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/smilies/LS1Tech/gr_stretch.gif)
#113
![Default](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
I didn't really like the SN95 looks too much, though I did drive a 95GT for awhile(it was slow, but had a drop top).
We're all entitled our opinion, but c'mon... too many here are obviously children or of such a backward mindset that they think hating something is a good idea. It's a car, not an abusive school teacher... There's no reason for anyone to lash out against it as if it's done something to them and if it negatively affects anyone that much mentally, they need help.
![Grin](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/smilies/LS1Tech/gr_grin.gif)
#114
![Default](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Stop tryn to act smart because your not.
Also your opinion isnt greater than mine or anyone else so i dont understand why you seem to think your opinion is better and when i gave facts you said i got my panties in a wad lol thats awesome
You'll not live long enough to ever hear about a real LS1 engine producing 2,000hp or more, but you already know the 4.6L Ford has, end of argument. The LS1 CANNOT make the power a 4.6L Ford can, period, because it's a physical impossibility due to the fact the LS1 block will crack 1st, even if the crank lasted long enough. This is why ALL the most serious "LS1" builders DON'T use an LS1 for that high level stuff! Unlike you, they know better.
![Grin](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/smilies/LS1Tech/gr_grin.gif)
shitstang nut swingers must be sitting on doughnuts because they are sure seem to be extremely butt hurt. By the way is yours pink with justin bieber on it? You and every other guy on here getting butthurt about the other people saying it looks like a honda, brz, 370z etc... Needs to stop crying its pathetic its like someone took your toy and now your bitching about it and yet no one cares grow up. Just remember opinions are like ******** everyone has one, and also remember no one is better than another person, so how can ones opinion be better than another? It can't when its a purely opinionated topic like this thread is
![Happy](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/smilies/LS1Tech/gr_stretch.gif)
I personally said, as did many others here, it looks like a Nissan 370z or Infiniti G37... For you to come along after the fact and claim I'm hurt by others saying it... STUPID! I said it myself, DOOD...
#115
Banned
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: chattanooga Tn
Posts: 1,352
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
![Default](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Originally Posted by It'llrun;No, I'm not.. unless compared to [B
some uneducated buffoon such as yourself, who can't even come close to forming a complete sentence in writing unless he gets lucky.[/B]
[quote=It'llrun;It isn't about who's opinion is better, but naturally, I'm going to consider my opinion over yours when they differ. That's what shows who's not smart... [/quote]
So picking your own opinion makes you smart huh, have you ever heard of changing your opinion/mind? Guess not....
Originally Posted by It'llrun;You didn't actually offer any valid fact that I argued against...[B
You STUPIDLY claimed that since the LS1 is bigger (internally) than the 4.6L Ford, it MUST be more capable of making power.[/B]
[quote=It'llrun;You failed, however, to be intelligent enough to do any homework on the matter. Had you done even a little, you'd quickly have found that the 4.6L, using FACTORY crank, block and heads, has made more power, by hundreds, than ANY LS1 ever to fire up. The real fact, android, is that the 4.6L engine is STRONGER AND MORE CAPABLE of making power than the LS1... by design. Ford didn't know GM was going to offer the LS1 when it produced the 4.6L, but just the same, built a stronger base for their engine than the LS1 is capable of being. It's able to hold up under pressure where the LS1 will fail and then some, period. That's the FACT of the matter, regardless how you feel about it!
You'll not live long enough to ever hear about a real LS1 engine producing 2,000hp or more, but you already know the 4.6L Ford has, end of argument. The LS1 CANNOT make the power a 4.6L Ford can, period, because it's a physical impossibility due to the fact the LS1 block will crack 1st, even if the crank lasted long enough. This is why ALL the most serious "LS1" builders DON'T use an LS1 for that high level stuff! Unlike you, they know better.
![Grin](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/smilies/LS1Tech/gr_grin.gif)
So your saying the 90's 4.6L can make more power then the LS1? I hope not.....
[quote=It'llrun;We're not butt hurt over idiots saying stupid and senseless things we all know don't matter. We're dealing with a few like you, who don't have enough sense to let things go because they hate, like an idiot.
I personally said, as did many others here, it looks like a Nissan 370z or Infiniti G37... For you to come along after the fact and claim I'm hurt by others saying it... STUPID! I said it myself, DOOD...[/quote]
you jumped down my throat about what I said on how the mustang looks like a Honda, you even said it doesn't look like it that others are saying it looks like the 370z 9Which personally i dont see it just my opinion) <------- wow imagine that another opinion in an opinionated thread hmmm maybe a butt hurt little girl like your self should stay on the mustang website forum considering this is a GM/Chevy fan base website or at least don't start crying when someone disagrees with you....
Last edited by "MAC"; 12-07-2013 at 11:21 AM. Reason: asdfdsvsfsfdsf
#116
Banned
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: chattanooga Tn
Posts: 1,352
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
![Default](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
i give up on tryn to make the your nonsense separated into different quotes just realize and understand i talk crap because i can, and the whole mustang looking like a honda well thats my opinion and also more cube = more power its been proven over and over again.
#117
Banned
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: chattanooga Tn
Posts: 1,352
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
![Default](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
It's too old school for you, but when I was in school, a motor was ALWAYS electric and an engine was not. Yes, they're considered the same thing today... too many stupid people to prevent that.
No, I'm not.. unless compared to some uneducated buffoon such as yourself, who can't even come close to forming a complete sentence in writing unless he gets lucky.
It isn't about who's opinion is better, but naturally, I'm going to consider my opinion over yours when they differ. That's what shows who's not smart... You didn't actually offer any valid fact that I argued against... You STUPIDLY claimed that since the LS1 is bigger (internally) than the 4.6L Ford, it MUST be more capable of making power. You failed, however, to be intelligent enough to do any homework on the matter. Had you done even a little, you'd quickly have found that the 4.6L, using FACTORY crank, block and heads, has made more power, by hundreds, than ANY LS1 ever to fire up. The real fact, android, is that the 4.6L engine is STRONGER AND MORE CAPABLE of making power than the LS1... by design. Ford didn't know GM was going to offer the LS1 when it produced the 4.6L, but just the same, built a stronger base for their engine than the LS1 is capable of being. It's able to hold up under pressure where the LS1 will fail and then some, period. That's the FACT of the matter, regardless how you feel about it!
You'll not live long enough to ever hear about a real LS1 engine producing 2,000hp or more, but you already know the 4.6L Ford has, end of argument. The LS1 CANNOT make the power a 4.6L Ford can, period, because it's a physical impossibility due to the fact the LS1 block will crack 1st, even if the crank lasted long enough. This is why ALL the most serious "LS1" builders DON'T use an LS1 for that high level stuff! Unlike you, they know better.![Grin](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/smilies/LS1Tech/gr_grin.gif)
We're not butt hurt over idiots saying stupid and senseless things we all know don't matter. We're dealing with a few like you, who don't have enough sense to let things go because they hate, like an idiot.
I personally said, as did many others here, it looks like a Nissan 370z or Infiniti G37... For you to come along after the fact and claim I'm hurt by others saying it... STUPID! I said it myself, DOOD...
No, I'm not.. unless compared to some uneducated buffoon such as yourself, who can't even come close to forming a complete sentence in writing unless he gets lucky.
It isn't about who's opinion is better, but naturally, I'm going to consider my opinion over yours when they differ. That's what shows who's not smart... You didn't actually offer any valid fact that I argued against... You STUPIDLY claimed that since the LS1 is bigger (internally) than the 4.6L Ford, it MUST be more capable of making power. You failed, however, to be intelligent enough to do any homework on the matter. Had you done even a little, you'd quickly have found that the 4.6L, using FACTORY crank, block and heads, has made more power, by hundreds, than ANY LS1 ever to fire up. The real fact, android, is that the 4.6L engine is STRONGER AND MORE CAPABLE of making power than the LS1... by design. Ford didn't know GM was going to offer the LS1 when it produced the 4.6L, but just the same, built a stronger base for their engine than the LS1 is capable of being. It's able to hold up under pressure where the LS1 will fail and then some, period. That's the FACT of the matter, regardless how you feel about it!
You'll not live long enough to ever hear about a real LS1 engine producing 2,000hp or more, but you already know the 4.6L Ford has, end of argument. The LS1 CANNOT make the power a 4.6L Ford can, period, because it's a physical impossibility due to the fact the LS1 block will crack 1st, even if the crank lasted long enough. This is why ALL the most serious "LS1" builders DON'T use an LS1 for that high level stuff! Unlike you, they know better.
![Grin](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/smilies/LS1Tech/gr_grin.gif)
We're not butt hurt over idiots saying stupid and senseless things we all know don't matter. We're dealing with a few like you, who don't have enough sense to let things go because they hate, like an idiot.
I personally said, as did many others here, it looks like a Nissan 370z or Infiniti G37... For you to come along after the fact and claim I'm hurt by others saying it... STUPID! I said it myself, DOOD...
Funny you say this because there is a thread in this very forum a guy already has a LS based motor that is making 2k hp and he is asking questions on how to get 3k hp again LS1 > 4.6L oh btw you can turn the LS1 into the LS 3, 6, and 7 by changing the internals it would cost a lot of money but you can do it.
Last edited by "MAC"; 12-07-2013 at 11:33 AM. Reason: asfsdf