sick_tight

oh my someone disagrees with Irunelevens and chaman... theyre all idiots.

the styling cues are completely subjective. ever wonder why people see different images with the rorschach tests?

jesus, fanboys get butt hurt fast on this topic

badformulaLS1

iTrader: (1)

Its going around on several LS groups and pages. I didn't know it was impossible for intelligent people to use Facebook. I also didn't know an opinion on car is what measures intelligence.

sick_tight

more importantly your opinion on which styling cues measures your intelligence. i get it those two CLEARLY like this new mustang but we all dont have to drink the koolaid.

It'llrun

Blah blah blah... You're spinning yourself into oblivion.

Engines(not motors) aside, as you're obviously clueless about engines, the 2015 Mustang looks like... A MUSTANG! It doesn't look like a Honda, but it strongly resembles Mustangs from far before your time, somewhat explaining the issue here...

I think it's actually a '66. I agree though, after just actually looking at it, not a '67.

Maybe some people showed up when the 5th gen wasn't even heard of yet and wasn't such a pig... Maybe some just like to learn. Maybe they just like seeing folks like you get your panties in a wad...



It looks nothing like that car, except for how it resembles any other car not remotely like it. If you must say it looks like some other car that used a design similar to the original Mustang, you could at least say that other car is a Nissan... It's no Honda.

So, Mustang had the look it has, only 50yrs ago and since other cars, most(all) of which weren't even invented when the Mustang was introduced, the Mustang is now "copying" the others. Got it.

Btw, the terminator and Fox body were clear departures from "screaming Mustang" as it was... They're the versions furthest from the original.

Irunelevens

You obviously don't know what some people (including myself) were saying about the New Edge Mustang when it was released. People were up in arms about the '94 as well. And the Foxbody. But now they all look like Mustangs... imagine that.

sick_tight

to be honest i think the foxbodies looked like escorts. the sn95s looked plain jane and the first mustangs i really liked were the new 11+ mustangs (obviously i loved the first gen mustangs). but again thats my personal opinion, crazy how people can have those.

Irunelevens

Right. But saying "it doesn't look like a Mustang" is ridiculous. And complaining about it being "too Euro" is equally ridiculous, especially if the person saying that has a Corvette. That car was developed with the sole purpose of emulating British sports cars, and the C7 is certainly taking more of a "euro" turn. I'm just saying, call a spade a spade.

sick_tight

who are you talking about?

Irunelevens

People on this site in general.

sick_tight

i havent said it looks like anything euro, i personally dont care if they went "euro" i did say it looks like a BRZ/Fusion and the side profile looked like a honda accord as well.

so who is the corvette owner you speak of? i actually have been praising this car more than anything with its light weight IRS and possible beefy power plant. no i am not a fan of the styling but because it doesnt look good or looks like you vehicles i stated.

i am not surprised to have more people not a fan of a ford mustang on this site, just like if i were on a mustang site watching comments on the new camaro. why do people not get this. this isnt "musclecartech.com" or "americancartech.net"

"MAC"

iTrader: (1)

Cant see your signature on my phone

"MAC"

iTrader: (1)

Please do tell me and everyone how an engine and a motor is different? Oh thats right you cant dumbass because engines and motors mean the same thing considering motor is the synonym for engine just like mechanism is as well. Stop tryn to act smart because your not. Also your opinion isnt greater than mine or anyone else so i dont understand why you seem to think your opinion is better and when i gave facts you said i got my panties in a wad lol thats awesome shitstang nut swingers must be sitting on doughnuts because they are sure seem to be extremely butt hurt. By the way is yours pink with justin bieber on it? You and every other guy on here getting butthurt about the other people saying it looks like a honda, brz, 370z etc... Needs to stop crying its pathetic its like someone took your toy and now your bitching about it and yet no one cares grow up. Just remember opinions are like ******** everyone has one, and also remember no one is better than another person, so how can ones opinion be better than another? It can't when its a purely opinionated topic like this thread is

It'llrun

Looked like the Escort... Because after the Mustang was such a massive hit for Ford, they brought their European Escort to America, with a body resembling the successful model preceding it... not too stupid.

I didn't really like the SN95 looks too much, though I did drive a 95GT for awhile(it was slow, but had a drop top).

We're all entitled our opinion, but c'mon... too many here are obviously children or of such a backward mindset that they think hating something is a good idea. It's a car, not an abusive school teacher... There's no reason for anyone to lash out against it as if it's done something to them and if it negatively affects anyone that much mentally, they need help.

It'llrun

It's too old school for you, but when I was in school, a motor was ALWAYS electric and an engine was not. Yes, they're considered the same thing today... too many stupid people to prevent that.

No, I'm not.. unless compared to some uneducated buffoon such as yourself, who can't even come close to forming a complete sentence in writing unless he gets lucky.

It isn't about who's opinion is better, but naturally, I'm going to consider my opinion over yours when they differ. That's what shows who's not smart... You didn't actually offer any valid fact that I argued against... You STUPIDLY claimed that since the LS1 is bigger (internally) than the 4.6L Ford, it MUST be more capable of making power. You failed, however, to be intelligent enough to do any homework on the matter. Had you done even a little, you'd quickly have found that the 4.6L, using FACTORY crank, block and heads, has made more power, by hundreds, than ANY LS1 ever to fire up. The real fact, android, is that the 4.6L engine is STRONGER AND MORE CAPABLE of making power than the LS1... by design. Ford didn't know GM was going to offer the LS1 when it produced the 4.6L, but just the same, built a stronger base for their engine than the LS1 is capable of being. It's able to hold up under pressure where the LS1 will fail and then some, period. That's the FACT of the matter, regardless how you feel about it!

You'll not live long enough to ever hear about a real LS1 engine producing 2,000hp or more, but you already know the 4.6L Ford has, end of argument. The LS1 CANNOT make the power a 4.6L Ford can, period, because it's a physical impossibility due to the fact the LS1 block will crack 1st, even if the crank lasted long enough. This is why ALL the most serious "LS1" builders DON'T use an LS1 for that high level stuff! Unlike you, they know better.

We're not butt hurt over idiots saying stupid and senseless things we all know don't matter. We're dealing with a few like you, who don't have enough sense to let things go because they hate, like an idiot.

I personally said, as did many others here, it looks like a Nissan 370z or Infiniti G37... For you to come along after the fact and claim I'm hurt by others saying it... STUPID! I said it myself, DOOD...

"MAC"

iTrader: (1)

Guess the people who wright the definitions are stupid huh, their degrees dont count and your degree is far superior to theirs....


1) Guess my High School Diploma doesn't count huh.... 2) Also when did this become an English class and are you the professor? If so God can only help us.

[quote=It'llrun;It isn't about who's opinion is better, but naturally, I'm going to consider my opinion over yours when they differ. That's what shows who's not smart... [/quote]

So picking your own opinion makes you smart huh, have you ever heard of changing your opinion/mind? Guess not....

Guess the saying "there's no replacement for displacement" goes completely out the window, even though its been proven time and time again that bigger the cubes the more power the motor can make.....

[quote=It'llrun;You failed, however, to be intelligent enough to do any homework on the matter. Had you done even a little, you'd quickly have found that the 4.6L, using FACTORY crank, block and heads, has made more power, by hundreds, than ANY LS1 ever to fire up. The real fact, android, is that the 4.6L engine is STRONGER AND MORE CAPABLE of making power than the LS1... by design. Ford didn't know GM was going to offer the LS1 when it produced the 4.6L, but just the same, built a stronger base for their engine than the LS1 is capable of being. It's able to hold up under pressure where the LS1 will fail and then some, period. That's the FACT of the matter, regardless how you feel about it!

You'll not live long enough to ever hear about a real LS1 engine producing 2,000hp or more, but you already know the 4.6L Ford has, end of argument. The LS1 CANNOT make the power a 4.6L Ford can, period, because it's a physical impossibility due to the fact the LS1 block will crack 1st, even if the crank lasted long enough. This is why ALL the most serious "LS1" builders DON'T use an LS1 for that high level stuff! Unlike you, they know better. [/quote]

So your saying the 90's 4.6L can make more power then the LS1? I hope not.....

[quote=It'llrun;We're not butt hurt over idiots saying stupid and senseless things we all know don't matter. We're dealing with a few like you, who don't have enough sense to let things go because they hate, like an idiot.

I personally said, as did many others here, it looks like a Nissan 370z or Infiniti G37... For you to come along after the fact and claim I'm hurt by others saying it... STUPID! I said it myself, DOOD...[/quote]

you jumped down my throat about what I said on how the mustang looks like a Honda, you even said it doesn't look like it that others are saying it looks like the 370z 9Which personally i dont see it just my opinion) <------- wow imagine that another opinion in an opinionated thread hmmm maybe a butt hurt little girl like your self should stay on the mustang website forum considering this is a GM/Chevy fan base website or at least don't start crying when someone disagrees with you....

"MAC"

iTrader: (1)

i give up on tryn to make the your nonsense separated into different quotes just realize and understand i talk crap because i can, and the whole mustang looking like a honda well thats my opinion and also more cube = more power its been proven over and over again.

"MAC"

iTrader: (1)

Funny you say this because there is a thread in this very forum a guy already has a LS based motor that is making 2k hp and he is asking questions on how to get 3k hp again LS1 > 4.6L oh btw you can turn the LS1 into the LS 3, 6, and 7 by changing the internals it would cost a lot of money but you can do it.

fruitsalad

iTrader: (5)

hahahahahahahahaha

You drive a 2014 Escape. End of argument. Hahahahahahahahahhaha

Irunelevens

LS-based =/= LS1

sick_tight

i thought the 4.6 comment was a joke but apparently not. i tried to ignore it.

please explain your reasoning Irun?