Automotive News, Media & Press Television | Magazines | Industry News

Media Leaks - The Real 2015 Ford Mustang

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 12-09-2013, 03:15 PM
  #161  
Banned
iTrader: (1)
 
"MAC"'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: chattanooga Tn
Posts: 1,352
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Colesitzy

First off: MAC just shut up, your saying things so dumb that they make me look like a freaking genius.

Second: This isn't 2002, Wikipedia is a credible source. Everything on there has to be cited for it to stay on more than a week.
Actually ive been given him the facts can't help he is too stupid to realize that what i was talking about and what he was talking about was completely different i fully understood what years they was referring to but when iyllrun or irunelevens brought up the other thread that's when i continued to back up what i said on the SHELBY gt500.
Old 12-09-2013, 03:21 PM
  #162  
On The Tree
 
Holloway5's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Posts: 125
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Lmao at this thread
Old 12-09-2013, 03:57 PM
  #163  
TECH Veteran
iTrader: (5)
 
chaman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 4,459
Likes: 0
Received 31 Likes on 26 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Colesitzy
First off: MAC just shut up, your saying things so dumb that they make me look like a freaking genius.

Second: This isn't 2002, Wikipedia is a credible source. Everything on there has to be cited for it to stay on more than a week.
As with almost all the crap you post Wikipedia is NOT credible source for one who wish to obtain 100% information about a subject. Its purpose is for fast accessible and general info. Wikipedia itself has a disclaimer of how they do not verify the expertise of its posters.

Educate yourself:

http://isites.harvard.edu/icb/icb.do...icb.page346376


Of course to shallow idiots like you Wikipedia is a gold mine. Go away.
Old 12-09-2013, 04:00 PM
  #164  
On The Tree
 
Colesitzy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: Wisconsin
Posts: 144
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by chaman
Of course to shallow idiots like you Wikipedia is a gold mine. Go away.
How about you **** off **** for brains?
Old 12-09-2013, 04:09 PM
  #165  
TECH Veteran
iTrader: (5)
 
chaman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 4,459
Likes: 0
Received 31 Likes on 26 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Colesitzy
How about you **** off **** for brains?
Truth too much too handle, Bib?
Old 12-09-2013, 05:52 PM
  #166  
Banned
iTrader: (1)
 
"MAC"'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: chattanooga Tn
Posts: 1,352
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by chaman

As with almost all the crap you post Wikipedia is NOT credible source for one who wish to obtain 100% information about a subject. Its purpose is for fast accessible and general info. Wikipedia itself has a disclaimer of how they do not verify the expertise of its posters.

Educate yourself:

http://isites.harvard.edu/icb/icb.do...icb.page346376

Of course to shallow idiots like you Wikipedia is a gold mine. Go away.
When did ls1tech become Harvard?
Old 12-09-2013, 06:03 PM
  #167  
Banned
iTrader: (1)
 
"MAC"'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: chattanooga Tn
Posts: 1,352
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Regardless agree to disagree if you like the new mustang good for you if you hate it thats cool too. Its all opinions anyways and our own opinion on cars sways us to the car we like.
Old 12-09-2013, 06:08 PM
  #168  
TECH Veteran
iTrader: (5)
 
chaman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 4,459
Likes: 0
Received 31 Likes on 26 Posts

Default

That's only an example which explains the true reason for Wikipedia. Go read the full wikipedia disclaimers, if Harvard is too intimidating for you. If you like to quote wikipedia that's fine, but don't believe its the definitive source of trustful info. There are lots of misinformation there.
Old 12-09-2013, 06:12 PM
  #169  
TECH Regular
 
sick_tight's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Jacksonville, FL
Posts: 443
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Old 12-09-2013, 06:17 PM
  #170  
Banned
iTrader: (1)
 
"MAC"'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: chattanooga Tn
Posts: 1,352
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by chaman
That's only an example which explains the true reason for Wikipedia. Go read the full wikipedia disclaimers, if Harvard is too intimidating for you. If you like to quote wikipedia that's fine, but don't believe its the definitive source of trustful info. There are lots of misinformation there.
I underatand that what im saying is that wiki isn't as bad as it used to be when it first started. I fully understand sites that end with ; edu and gov are preferred over wiki but honestly when your doing a simple search for a stupid argument over the internet and guys get butt hurt using wiki will suffice
Old 12-10-2013, 07:50 AM
  #171  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (1)
 
jmurray87's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Fort Worth, TX
Posts: 1,894
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

This looks horrible.



The "base"? Radio looks very dated and out of place.
Old 12-10-2013, 06:06 PM
  #172  
TECH Addict
 
It'llrun's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: N. FL
Posts: 2,708
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by jmurray87
This looks horrible.

The "base"? Radio looks very dated and out of place.
That doesn't look like the system I saw in this new car much at all... Looks more like the current model stereo in the new car, like it's filling a spot.
Old 12-11-2013, 02:23 AM
  #173  
12 Second Club
 
JDEP162's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Posts: 1,550
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

Originally Posted by sick_tight
hahaha, holy **** thats funny. i may have to steal that bro
Old 12-12-2013, 02:41 AM
  #174  
On The Tree
iTrader: (7)
 
GoodSpeed150's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Severn, MD
Posts: 199
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

I REALLY like the car. Everything on paper looks amazing. Especially the weight. I hope GM is working some magic on their next-gen camaro....
Old 12-12-2013, 11:24 AM
  #175  
TECH Apprentice
iTrader: (7)
 
deft's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: pennsylvania
Posts: 382
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by GoodSpeed150
I REALLY like the car. Everything on paper looks amazing. Especially the weight. I hope GM is working some magic on their next-gen camaro....
Agreed on all points, when companies compete the customer wins.
Old 12-12-2013, 11:59 AM
  #176  
Banned
iTrader: (1)
 
"MAC"'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: chattanooga Tn
Posts: 1,352
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

LOL so the new mustang is going to be lighter (sorry Hammer your wrong) here is the quote "The new Mustang has also shed weight, thanks to the use of aluminum in its hood, fenders, and various suspension components. Camaro fans might argue that weight savings don’t get more extreme than the Z/28, however."

Read more: http://www.nydailynews.com/autos/gru...#ixzz2nHiC6Eem
Old 12-12-2013, 01:02 PM
  #177  
TECH Junkie
iTrader: (2)
 
-Ross-'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Houston/Alvin, TX
Posts: 3,828
Received 19 Likes on 14 Posts

Default

Interior looks pretty good to me.

Old 12-12-2013, 01:27 PM
  #178  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (1)
 
Z Fury's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Indianapolis
Posts: 1,595
Received 10 Likes on 7 Posts

Default

Steering wheels are getting too complex - it's like having a universal remote attached to it. Not a knock on Ford though as everyone is doing it.

I still like this car a lot. It will definitely perform well and force GM to re-raise the bar on the 6th Gen. No matter what camp you're in, this is good news. Arguing the look is pointless because what looks good is subjective. The performance matters above all else, and this car will definitely perform well.
Old 12-12-2013, 04:39 PM
  #179  
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (4)
 
ULTIMATEORANGESS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: eatontown,nj
Posts: 10,976
Likes: 0
Received 17 Likes on 15 Posts

Smile

i want looks and performance. otherwise id just buy a **** box vega and have A SBC installed.
Old 12-13-2013, 06:40 AM
  #180  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (6)
 
NW-99SS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: AB, Canada
Posts: 1,136
Received 171 Likes on 119 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by ULTIMATEORANGESS
i want looks and performance. otherwise id just buy a **** box vega and have A SBC installed.
Vega wagon FTW!


Quick Reply: Media Leaks - The Real 2015 Ford Mustang



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:32 PM.