Dodge Challenger SRT HEMI Hellcat Officially Rated at 707hp
#21
On The Tree
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Posts: 182
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
![Default](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Let me think of something to complain about then I'll report back
Edit: wait, has a missing headlight because of an air duct? Safety hazard. Way to go dodge, can't even get anything right.
Edit: wait, has a missing headlight because of an air duct? Safety hazard. Way to go dodge, can't even get anything right.
#22
Douchebag On The Tree
#23
TECH Addict
iTrader: (1)
![Default](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
I still think the Z is cooler, but i really dig the whole "beat them at their own game in an overweight pig using outdated technology" thing.
It certainly has the power to get to 200mph, but I'm curious to see if the brick can push enough air out of the way to get there. Who knows...didn't the '13 GT500 hit the mark? It's no aerodynamic wonder either.
One thing is for certain. I want one and I can only imagine doing bad things with it.
It certainly has the power to get to 200mph, but I'm curious to see if the brick can push enough air out of the way to get there. Who knows...didn't the '13 GT500 hit the mark? It's no aerodynamic wonder either.
One thing is for certain. I want one and I can only imagine doing bad things with it.
A 4th gen Camaro is 0.34/ frontal area of 22/total CDA of 7.48
I found a Challenger cd at .35, total area should be close to Charger.
There is no reason this thing should not be aerodynamically capable of 200mph with 707 hp on tap.
#24
Douchebag On The Tree
![Default](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Aerodynamics are very diffucult to judge with the naked eye. A 2006 Dodge Charger is listed at a cd of 0.33 and total area of around 8.56.
A 4th gen Camaro is 0.34/ frontal area of 22/total CDA of 7.48
I found a Challenger cd at .35, total area should be close to Charger.
There is no reason this thing should not be aerodynamically capable of 200mph with 707 hp on tap.
A 4th gen Camaro is 0.34/ frontal area of 22/total CDA of 7.48
I found a Challenger cd at .35, total area should be close to Charger.
There is no reason this thing should not be aerodynamically capable of 200mph with 707 hp on tap.
It should hit 200mph, but you never know. It has all the power you ever need and with all that torque and 6 or 8 gears, it certainly shouldn't run out of revs.
#25
TECH Addict
iTrader: (1)
![Default](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Hard to say, it really depends on if they put the thought into it. More bulges, scoops, and air ducts that are necessary for these high horsepower monsters can wreak havoc on aerodynamics if the only focus was looks and cooling.
It should hit 200mph, but you never know. It has all the power you ever need and with all that torque and 6 or 8 gears, it certainly shouldn't run out of revs.
It should hit 200mph, but you never know. It has all the power you ever need and with all that torque and 6 or 8 gears, it certainly shouldn't run out of revs.
I would be willing to go out on a limb and say that this car is not at a statistically significant aerodynamic disadvantage to the 2014 GT5honey. Cd and total area should be pretty close. If it cam anywhere close to 200mph with 662 hp, this car should make it.
#26
![Default](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Hard to say, it really depends on if they put the thought into it. More bulges, scoops, and air ducts that are necessary for these high horsepower monsters can wreak havoc on aerodynamics if the only focus was looks and cooling.
It should hit 200mph, but you never know. It has all the power you ever need and with all that torque and 6 or 8 gears, it certainly shouldn't run out of revs.
It should hit 200mph, but you never know. It has all the power you ever need and with all that torque and 6 or 8 gears, it certainly shouldn't run out of revs.
Without anything improved suspension wise (none that I have heard at least) I wouldn't be the least bit surprised if they threw on a 98 mph speed cap like all the trucks get.
![Happy](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/smilies/LS1Tech/gr_stretch.gif)
#28
TECH Junkie
iTrader: (29)
![Default](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Source “Danno” wrote that the Hellcat Challenger hit 202 mph in testing; production cars might not, as changes were made to enhance cooling and durability. With 707 hp, the final word is still on its way
#29
TECH Junkie
iTrader: (29)
![Default](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
The fastest Mopar four-seater ever made was the Dodge Charger Daytona, which broke the 200 mph barrier in 1970, thanks to the hot 426 Hemi V8 and a great deal of time in wind tunnels. Can the new Charger or Challenger meet or beat that time?
Forum member “AutoTechnician” wrote, “The power required to overcome aerodynamic drag increases with the cube of the speed (e.g. 20 mph requires eight times the power as 10 mph to push through the air.) Factor in mechanical losses, rolling resistance, etc... and you're easily well over 600 hp required at the crankshaft to do 200 mph. The 638HP ZR1 can only do 205 mph.” The efficient eight-speed automatic and ZF axle may help SRT by cutting parasitic losses.
Forum member “AutoTechnician” wrote, “The power required to overcome aerodynamic drag increases with the cube of the speed (e.g. 20 mph requires eight times the power as 10 mph to push through the air.) Factor in mechanical losses, rolling resistance, etc... and you're easily well over 600 hp required at the crankshaft to do 200 mph. The 638HP ZR1 can only do 205 mph.” The efficient eight-speed automatic and ZF axle may help SRT by cutting parasitic losses.
#30
TECH Junkie
iTrader: (15)
![Default](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
So, put a set of drag radials on it when you are at the track.
At those hp levels, even a 305 street radial is going to have traction issues.
275's will get the job done.
Armen 57 Chevy / Artis Nova wild 275 drag radial PSCA Fontana 9 19 09 Q3 - YouTube
If all people can complain about with this thing is that the rear tires are 1" narrower than "ideal", Dodge/SRT didn't do a bad job.
At those hp levels, even a 305 street radial is going to have traction issues.
275's will get the job done.
Armen 57 Chevy / Artis Nova wild 275 drag radial PSCA Fontana 9 19 09 Q3 - YouTube
If all people can complain about with this thing is that the rear tires are 1" narrower than "ideal", Dodge/SRT didn't do a bad job.
275's on this thing goes right up on the list of "bad ideas" with the GT500's getting 285 road racing tires, 662hp, and a solid rear axel
![Icon Lol](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/smilies2/icon_lol.gif)
#31
![Default](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
![The Jester](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/smilies/LS1Tech/gr_jest.gif)
It certainly has the power to get to 200mph, but I'm curious to see if the brick can push enough air out of the way to get there. Who knows...didn't the '13 GT500 hit the mark? It's no aerodynamic wonder either.
One thing is for certain. I want one and I can only imagine doing bad things with it.
![Winky](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/smilies/LS1Tech/gr_wink.gif)
#33
TECH Resident
iTrader: (4)
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Eau Claire-ish, WI
Posts: 853
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
![](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/ranks/ls1tech10year.png)
![Default](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Ehh...from what I remember it was never tested right. All the people testing top speed did so on 90+ degree days at high altitude. It'd still take a couple few miles either way, but so does every single other car with those kind of ratings. It takes the ZR1 about a mile just to go from 200 to 205.
#34
![Default](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
![Winky](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/smilies/LS1Tech/gr_wink.gif)
#37
![Default](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
C'mon man... it is what it is and it is... IS a really big deal because it's so difficult, not because it's easy. It does impress people... because so few vehicles have ever done it... because it's so difficult.
You can attempt to discount it all you want, but the facts remain and they support every idea that 200mph in any factory stock production vehicle is indeed a very big deal, particularly when offered by a major manufacturer.
Btw, Ford didn't really tell the world the car can break 200mph for marketing claims, RIGHT? Of course they did! Any builder would. They also brag about 662hp... why wouldn't they? That's called advertisement. Did Chevy make the same claim about the ZR1? They sure did and just like with the GT500, it meant plenty! It ain't braggin' though, when it's true. It seems that fewer than 20 production model vehicles in history have been able to go that fast... no big deal? Hardly.
#38
TECH Junkie
iTrader: (15)
![Default](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Idk, did it ever do 200mph? I haven't seen it anywhere if it has. I'm not hating, I actually really like these cars. It's just meaningless to me unless the consumer can actually do it. It's a big deal, but much less of a big deal when you can barely ever do it.
As far as I know, nobody has been able to make it go that speed except for the Ford group "coincidentally". Road and Track got 189mph
http://www.caranddriver.com/features...189-mph-page-2
Motor Trend got 196mph
These were both on extreme courses with looooong straight aways and banked corners. An extremely low percentage of consumers will ever be able to even touch those speeds, let alone 200mph. They dropped the cars gears down to 3.31 gears just to be able to reach that speed on paper-not that anyone can really actually ever do it without extremely ideal conditions. Thus, to me, it's a stat that doesn't matter because the consumer can't really do it. The car is impressive, yes, and I actually really like the car a lot but that claim is only being made by people who have never done and will never do it 99.999999999999% of the time. Maybe somebody has done it and I just haven't heard about it. I honestly don't know.
It's kind of like the old claim "it's so aerodynamic you could drive it upside down on the ceiling in a tunnel." Ok, bold claim, let's see it.
As far as I know, nobody has been able to make it go that speed except for the Ford group "coincidentally". Road and Track got 189mph
http://www.caranddriver.com/features...189-mph-page-2
Motor Trend got 196mph
These were both on extreme courses with looooong straight aways and banked corners. An extremely low percentage of consumers will ever be able to even touch those speeds, let alone 200mph. They dropped the cars gears down to 3.31 gears just to be able to reach that speed on paper-not that anyone can really actually ever do it without extremely ideal conditions. Thus, to me, it's a stat that doesn't matter because the consumer can't really do it. The car is impressive, yes, and I actually really like the car a lot but that claim is only being made by people who have never done and will never do it 99.999999999999% of the time. Maybe somebody has done it and I just haven't heard about it. I honestly don't know.
It's kind of like the old claim "it's so aerodynamic you could drive it upside down on the ceiling in a tunnel." Ok, bold claim, let's see it.
Last edited by MasterTomos; 07-08-2014 at 01:21 AM.
#39
TECH Junkie
iTrader: (2)
![Default](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Idk, did it ever do 200mph? I haven't seen it anywhere if it has. I'm not hating, I actually really like these cars. It's just meaningless to me unless the consumer can actually do it. It's a big deal, but much less of a big deal when you can barely ever do it.
As far as I know, nobody has been able to make it go that speed except for the Ford group "coincidentally". Road and Track got 189mph
http://www.caranddriver.com/features...189-mph-page-2
Motor Trend got 196mph
2013 Ford Shelby GT500 Chases 200 MPH! - Ignition Episode 18 - YouTube
These were both on extreme courses with looooong straight aways and banked corners. An extremely low percentage of consumers will ever be able to even touch those speeds, let alone 200mph. They dropped the cars gears down to 3.31 gears just to be able to reach that speed on paper-not that anyone can really actually ever do it without extremely ideal conditions. Thus, to me, it's a stat that doesn't matter because the consumer can't really do it. The car is impressive, yes, and I actually really like the car a lot but that claim is only being made by people who have never done and will never do it 99.999999999999% of the time. Maybe somebody has done it and I just haven't heard about it. I honestly don't know.
It's kind of like the old claim "it's so aerodynamic you could drive it upside down on the ceiling in a tunnel." Ok, bold claim, let's see it.
As far as I know, nobody has been able to make it go that speed except for the Ford group "coincidentally". Road and Track got 189mph
http://www.caranddriver.com/features...189-mph-page-2
Motor Trend got 196mph
2013 Ford Shelby GT500 Chases 200 MPH! - Ignition Episode 18 - YouTube
These were both on extreme courses with looooong straight aways and banked corners. An extremely low percentage of consumers will ever be able to even touch those speeds, let alone 200mph. They dropped the cars gears down to 3.31 gears just to be able to reach that speed on paper-not that anyone can really actually ever do it without extremely ideal conditions. Thus, to me, it's a stat that doesn't matter because the consumer can't really do it. The car is impressive, yes, and I actually really like the car a lot but that claim is only being made by people who have never done and will never do it 99.999999999999% of the time. Maybe somebody has done it and I just haven't heard about it. I honestly don't know.
It's kind of like the old claim "it's so aerodynamic you could drive it upside down on the ceiling in a tunnel." Ok, bold claim, let's see it.
Most people won't even ever go 150 mph, so who gives a crap?