Automotive News, Media & Press Television | Magazines | Industry News

Fords New 605hp Shelby Supersnake Tested

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 11-30-2007, 09:07 AM
  #61  
TECH Veteran
iTrader: (1)
 
Steve1969LS1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Anaheim Hills, CA
Posts: 4,274
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by 02z0sick
every 100 pounds its about equal to 10hp so if the new z06 its got 505hp on 3000pounds the shelby with 605hp 3900pounds and a lot more torque from its blower should be able to keep up with the new z06 and even beat it.
That sort of ignores a ton of other differences.. for one, what about aerodynamics??

Also the Z06 is only down 50-60 hp at the wheels.. and the blower is more effected by heat soak.
Old 11-30-2007, 10:08 AM
  #62  
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (22)
 
zigroid's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: 18013
Posts: 713
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by 02z0sick
every 100 pounds its about equal to 10hp so if the new z06 its got 505hp on 3000pounds the shelby with 605hp 3900pounds and a lot more torque from its blower should be able to keep up with the new z06 and even beat it.
it doesnt work exactly like that. look at power to weight ratio... how many lbs does each horsepower have to move?

the Z06 is...
3150 lb / 505 hp = 6.24 lb per hp
the shelby GT500 super snake is also 4100 lbs, not 3900.
4100 lb / 605 hp = 6.78 lb per hp
even assuming if it is 3900 lbs then it would be...
3900 lb / 605 hp = 6.45 lb per hp
better, but still not there.
when you step up to the non warrantied version...
4100 lb / 725 hp = 5.66 lb per hp

so the 725 hp version should beat the Z06, but the Z06 still has it beat in aerodynamics and I would bet in gearing and traction.

IMO ford is stupid for making these cars weigh this much. they may make more hp, but it doesnt seem to get them anywhere...
Old 11-30-2007, 10:20 AM
  #63  
TECH Resident
iTrader: (18)
 
5301113's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Odessa TX
Posts: 953
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Mr. B
As soon as you take the BS factory tune out and put an SCT Tune in (removing all the crap) and then put straight through mufflers- easy 11's, maybe even 10's with a tire.
Stock for stock, with that being said. Tune and straight mufflers on the vette will still out perform the cobra
Old 11-30-2007, 11:08 AM
  #64  
TECH Resident
iTrader: (18)
 
5301113's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Odessa TX
Posts: 953
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by zigroid
it doesnt work exactly like that. look at power to weight ratio... how many lbs does each horsepower have to move?

the Z06 is...
3150 lb / 505 hp = 6.24 lb per hp
the shelby GT500 super snake is also 4100 lbs, not 3900.
4100 lb / 605 hp = 6.78 lb per hp
even assuming if it is 3900 lbs then it would be...
3900 lb / 605 hp = 6.45 lb per hp
better, but still not there.
when you step up to the non warrantied version...
4100 lb / 725 hp = 5.66 lb per hp

so the 725 hp version should beat the Z06, but the Z06 still has it beat in aerodynamics and I would bet in gearing and traction.

IMO ford is stupid for making these cars weigh this much. they may make more hp, but it doesnt seem to get them anywhere...

Thats SAD that Ford needs 225 or more HP to MAYBE have the equal preformance to Z06
Old 11-30-2007, 12:22 PM
  #65  
TECH Addict
iTrader: (12)
 
Shackleford's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Houston, Texas
Posts: 2,693
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Wow. Ford blows.
Old 11-30-2007, 03:17 PM
  #66  
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (22)
 
zigroid's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: 18013
Posts: 713
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by 5301113
Thats SAD that Ford needs 225 or more HP to MAYBE have the equal preformance to Z06
yup. for $70k it should at least have an aluminum block and some weight reduction. most people just want to say they have 600 or 700 hp, they dont care about weight or actual performance. someone who cares about performance would get a base V6 mustang and do serious work to that.
Old 11-30-2007, 03:42 PM
  #67  
TECH Resident
iTrader: (18)
 
5301113's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Odessa TX
Posts: 953
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by zigroid
yup. for $70k it should at least have an aluminum block and some weight reduction. most people just want to say they have 600 or 700 hp, they dont care about weight or actual performance. someone who cares about performance would get a base V6 mustang and do serious work to that.
Thats right you tell em!!!!!!!!!!
Old 12-10-2007, 01:33 AM
  #68  
11 Second Club
iTrader: (3)
 
Built LT1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: SoCal
Posts: 518
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I wonder what the Ford people are saying about this car? I'm wondering what excuse they're gonna come up with [this] time as to why it's still "unfair" to compare this car to the C6Z...

I just wrote a thread about this car and how much it sucks. The GT500 can't beat an LS2 400 horse Vette in a drag race, let alone on a track. The Vette adds 30 horsepower for 2008, and is still about even with the new (over $100,000.00) Shelby Super Pig...go figure.

Here's the link for those interested:

https://ls1tech.com/forums/racer-s-lounge/827189-attn-ford-fans-who-get-upset-comparing-gt500-c6z-fair-enough.html
Old 12-10-2007, 02:00 AM
  #69  
11 Second Club
iTrader: (3)
 
Built LT1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: SoCal
Posts: 518
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by 02z0sick
every 100 pounds its about equal to 10hp so if the new z06 its got 505hp on 3000pounds the shelby with 605hp 3900pounds and a lot more torque from its blower should be able to keep up with the new z06 and even beat it.
That's analogous to what people said about the GT500 and the LS2 Vette, and we know what happened there.

It's kind offunny that there's people in this thread already saying what will happen when they put on the drag radials and modify the car. This car has over 600 horsepower and it runs on par with a "base model" 2008 C6!

Last edited by Built LT1; 01-06-2008 at 04:07 PM.
Old 12-10-2007, 10:31 AM
  #70  
Staging Lane
 
Crowe 02'Z28's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Suburb of Atlanta / Winder-GA.
Posts: 97
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

The plain and simple truth. I will not pay 70k for a mustang! If I had 70k to throw around it would be a Z06 Vette. The Z06 outclasses any mustang hands down! It doesn't take a degree to understand going fast comes down to one thing! POWER TO WEIGHT RATIO!! PERIOD !! everything else is BULL****!! Z06 Vette - 3150 lbs // Super **** Mustang 4100 lbs!!
Old 12-10-2007, 01:04 PM
  #71  
11 Second Club
iTrader: (3)
 
Built LT1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: SoCal
Posts: 518
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Crowe 02'Z28
It doesn't take a degree to understand going fast comes down to one thing! POWER TO WEIGHT RATIO!! PERIOD !!

It kinda makes you wonder where Ford engineers get their degrees from. This Super Snake is a disgrace, and the only this Super about it is its price tag.

Last edited by Built LT1; 12-11-2007 at 12:03 AM.
Old 12-10-2007, 03:23 PM
  #72  
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (12)
 
KW4life06's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Cedar Rapids, IA
Posts: 534
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

body kits, big rims, and blowers. sounds like a pedigree for a bad tv car show
Old 12-12-2007, 01:22 AM
  #73  
TECH Junkie
 
slick1851's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: CHITOWN
Posts: 3,265
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

Originally Posted by 2002_z28_m6
Did any of you read the article in Road and Track on this Shelby Super Snake. It has 605hp weighs 3915lbs. Costs $70,670 Here is the performance stats. Right out of the magazine.
0-60 in 4.4 seconds
1/4 mile 12.5 @ 119mph
Top speed 150 Electroncally limited

Not really all that impressive at all. How do you build a 605hp car that runs mid 12's. People can say its the driver all they want but those guys who test these things consistently put down better numbers than you ever see that model run at the track (stock). I cant see traction being the problem because they achieved 0-60 in 4.4 seconds. If it is why doesnt ford use a traction control like the vette. The z06 with the traction on launches flawlessly. I guess the guys at ford will be scratching their heads once again trying to beat the Z06. Its a fair comparison cause they cost the same right.

The first time a Super Snake owner races a Z06 he will look like this


Thats so weak out of the box
Old 12-19-2007, 11:45 AM
  #74  
Launching!
iTrader: (2)
 
hammerdown2000's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 277
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

if you spend 60,000 on a 12 sec car you deserve to drive a ford!
Old 12-22-2007, 10:53 PM
  #75  
Staging Lane
 
98_WS6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: SAn jose/half moon bay
Posts: 67
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

the supersnake is so fast that it not going to compare with the new camaro.. and thats why ford called it the "Corvette killer"...J/k
Old 12-23-2007, 12:33 AM
  #76  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (7)
 
GMmexican's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: San Jose, CA
Posts: 1,607
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

thats why the mustang i fear the most is the light weight cheap 5.0
Old 12-25-2007, 12:05 AM
  #77  
TECH Enthusiast
 
Darksol's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: On a car lot, shopping...
Posts: 697
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Hydramatic
I wasn't talking about drag racing, that is grounds for a full track shut-down at ANY strip in the U.S.

In case ya'll haven't caught on, there IS more than one kind of racing on this planet...
What exactly do you race in a 16 second truck in the rain? 10 year old Volvo's?
Hell what do you race in the dry with a 16 second truck? 20 year old Escort's?
Old 01-05-2008, 10:37 PM
  #78  
On The Tree
 
Mavmavv's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 165
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Guys, Ford engineers never intended the GT500 to go up against a Corvette. The car is outclassed from day 1. Pony car vs Sports car, simple as that.

Ford sells all the variations of Mustangs because they know people will buy them! The saying "mustangs are like tampons, every ****** got one", its true. Ford knows this and wants to capitalize on it. Hell, even I have a stang now, just picked up an 89LX 5.0. You know whats going in there if I ever want to go fast? An LS based motor.

GM is all about being top dog these days, Ford is looking to make profits and keep its head above water... maybe Ford is being the smart one.
Old 01-06-2008, 12:52 AM
  #79  
Banned
 
Z ROADSTER's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Shreveport,Louisiana
Posts: 661
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Anyone seen this months addition of CAR & DRIVER ?
Tuner car shootout .Viper~Z06~GT40 . Guess which high-dollar tuner car won outright ! Do you suppose the Ford GT40 is the reason GM is willing to produce a $100,000.00 street car for public consumption ? Rumor has it the twin turbo GT40 is being tested for a comeback release the day before GM announces their Z1R for sale . Should be an interesting year for gearheads . Chrysler is out of money so their twin turbo Viper will never see the light of day .
Old 01-06-2008, 01:41 AM
  #80  
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (12)
 
KW4life06's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Cedar Rapids, IA
Posts: 534
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

unfortunately mustangs are capitalizing on a smart idea. make them really cheap, and makes lots of them. that way they are really successful. ive never heard the ***** remark, but ive heard 'mustangs are like bellybuttons, everyone has one'. the thing with any car they put out is, they have a big enough crowd everyone will hump it whether it sucks or not


Quick Reply: Fords New 605hp Shelby Supersnake Tested



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:49 PM.