ZL1 Dyno
#3
#7
![Default](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Your 'buddy' will be busy all day spending $$ replacing JUNK parts of the car like the dual mass flywheel they are putting in the ZL1.
900 is not going to happen. I guarantee that.
would be lucky to hit 750 flywheel. after a larger blower, cam, high flow heads, exhaust, pullied down, tuned, etc.
Trending Topics
#9
TECH Regular
iTrader: (18)
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Joppa, MD
Posts: 493
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
![](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/ranks/ls1tech10year.png)
![Default](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
My point is... there is nothing you can do to it other than ripping that LSA that has the 1.9L blower on it out of the car, and doing something completely different. its a waste of $$..
Your 'buddy' will be busy all day spending $$ replacing JUNK parts of the car like the dual mass flywheel they are putting in the ZL1.
900 is not going to happen. I guarantee that.
would be lucky to hit 750 flywheel. after a larger blower, cam, high flow heads, exhaust, pullied down, tuned, etc.
Your 'buddy' will be busy all day spending $$ replacing JUNK parts of the car like the dual mass flywheel they are putting in the ZL1.
900 is not going to happen. I guarantee that.
would be lucky to hit 750 flywheel. after a larger blower, cam, high flow heads, exhaust, pullied down, tuned, etc.
![Thatfunny](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/smilies2/thatfunny.gif)
![Rotflmao](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/smilies2/rotflmao.gif)
![Rotflmao](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/smilies2/rotflmao.gif)
![Rotflmao](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/smilies2/rotflmao.gif)
You are absolutely clueless!
![Nod](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/smilies/LS1Tech/gr_nod.gif)
#10
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (18)
![Default](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
"2012 ZL1 Camaro with automatic transmission, baseline 1/4 mile dragstrip testing:
Run #1: 12.52 @ 116.3 mph with a 2.0 60 ft."
"Nitto 20 inch drag radials: 12.11 @ 116.1 mph with a 1.81 60 ft. time.
This car made 467 rwhp thru the factory auto transmission on our Dynojet dyno a couple of days ago."
#11
TECH Regular
iTrader: (14)
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Cypress TX
Posts: 422
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
![Default](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Nothing wrong with the 1900 blower, the fastest V2 is running a ported stock blower, with nitrous. Its the same motor, if the camaro is slower it must be due to suspension.
https://ls1tech.com/forums/texas-mem...s-v-video.html
https://ls1tech.com/forums/texas-mem...net-video.html
But for once, the Caddy has the stronger rear end... Camaro's are blowing their rears and the 9 second V2 above is on the stock rear (upgraded trans).
https://ls1tech.com/forums/texas-mem...s-v-video.html
https://ls1tech.com/forums/texas-mem...net-video.html
But for once, the Caddy has the stronger rear end... Camaro's are blowing their rears and the 9 second V2 above is on the stock rear (upgraded trans).
#12
![Default](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
i think the point of this car is to build a fast road track car, not so much a drag car despite what the youtube video they put out saying.
The ford might be faster in a straight line but i dont see it winning once corners are being tossed at it.
The ford might be faster in a straight line but i dont see it winning once corners are being tossed at it.
#15
![Default](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
I mean a 911tt has launch control, so does a corvette, and a cobalt ss tc. all of those excel at taking corners more so then they do leaving from a dig.
im just saying that this car nor the gt500 should not have its worth determined by its drag time. the 7:40 or what not on the ring shows that this is a serious performance car in a similar vein to a boss 302....just quicker.
#16
TECH Resident
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Winnipeg, mb
Posts: 789
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
![Default](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
My bet is gearing. That one reason the ss is slow compared to the V1. We have 3.73 they have 3.42 in the rear probably for gas milage. If they did the same thing to the new camaro I could see that being a factor.
#17
![Default](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Cluesless.. ah, ok.
900 is not happening, unless you change out everything.. stroke, forged, heads..etc. Turbo, Whipple.
All these people must be clueless too
http://www.camaro5.com/forums/showthread.php?t=216480
http://www.camaro5.com/forums/showthread.php?t=225491
https://ls1tech.com/forums/dynamomet...l1-camaro.html
https://ls1tech.com/forums/multimedi...rip-video.html
http://www.camaro5.com/forums/showthread.php?t=226073
900 is not happening, unless you change out everything.. stroke, forged, heads..etc. Turbo, Whipple.
All these people must be clueless too
http://www.camaro5.com/forums/showthread.php?t=216480
http://www.camaro5.com/forums/showthread.php?t=225491
https://ls1tech.com/forums/dynamomet...l1-camaro.html
https://ls1tech.com/forums/multimedi...rip-video.html
http://www.camaro5.com/forums/showthread.php?t=226073
#18
![Default](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Why not just buy "Livernois Motorsports" 9sec ZL1, its for sale and comes ready to run, hell of a deal for 69k.
http://www.lsxtv.com/news/livernois-...ond-camaro-zl1
http://www.lsxtv.com/news/livernois-...ond-camaro-zl1