Cadillac CTS-V 2004-2007 (Gen I) The Caddy with an Attitude...

ProCharger -vs- Maggie?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 06-05-2007, 02:33 AM
  #1  
Teching In
Thread Starter
 
]<ing's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 35
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Question ProCharger -vs- Maggie?

Excuse the ignorance. Some of you replied to my thread about the modded V I'm looking at, and I appreciate all the input/answers I've received on this site. I'm an enthusiast with very little aftermarket experience - so again - please excuse the Newbiness.

The particular V I'm looking has a dealer installed Procharger.

* Is a ProCharger different than a Maggie (both just brand names of the same thing)?
* What are the differences (typical gains, efficiency, cost, etc)?
* Pros and cons of each?
* Other FI options?

Any other FI info, links, etc would be greatly appreciated.
Old 06-05-2007, 04:57 AM
  #2  
EPP
FormerVendor
iTrader: (22)
 
EPP's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Posts: 13,063
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

http://www.exoticperformanceplus.com...Car.php?car=38
http://www.exoticperformanceplus.com...Car.php?car=33
http://www.exoticperformanceplus.com/movies/ctsv3.mpg
http://www.exoticperformanceplus.com/movies/ctsv4.mpg
http://www.exoticperformanceplus.com/movies/ctsv5.mpg

Check out the CTS-V's above in which we installed our ATI ProCharger pckage that we developed. An ATI ProCharger is a centrifical type of supercharger, and a maggie is a positive displacement (Roots) type. Bob
Old 06-05-2007, 05:21 AM
  #3  
Teching In
Thread Starter
 
]<ing's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 35
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Exotic Performance Plus
http://www.exoticperformanceplus.com...Car.php?car=38
http://www.exoticperformanceplus.com...Car.php?car=33
http://www.exoticperformanceplus.com/movies/ctsv3.mpg
http://www.exoticperformanceplus.com/movies/ctsv4.mpg
http://www.exoticperformanceplus.com/movies/ctsv5.mpg

Check out the CTS-V's above in which we installed our ATI ProCharger pckage that we developed. An ATI ProCharger is a centrifical type of supercharger, and a maggie is a positive displacement (Roots) type. Bob
Centrifical superchargers are generally considered the more efficient of the two, right?

I'm not asking you to pimp your gear, but why should I install your package instead of a Maggie?
Old 06-05-2007, 06:05 AM
  #4  
EPP
FormerVendor
iTrader: (22)
 
EPP's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Posts: 13,063
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Smile

Originally Posted by ]<ing
Centrifical superchargers are generally considered the more efficient of the two, right?

I'm not asking you to pimp your gear, but why should I install your package instead of a Maggie?
I don't mind pimping. lol...

The ATI ProChargers run cooler, and produce more mid range and upper horsepower, right where you need it.

http://www.exoticperformanceplus.com....html?item=438
ProCharger FAQ's.

http://www.exoticperformanceplus.com....html?item=440
Want to know why an ATI ProCharger is better? Bob
Old 06-05-2007, 01:46 PM
  #5  
9 Second Club
 
MCasano1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Mississippi Gulf Coast
Posts: 289
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Based solely on my limited research and information - the Procharger will have more potential, be more efficient (for power) and not get heat soaked so bad. I'm planning to put one on my car.
Old 06-05-2007, 04:56 PM
  #6  
Teching In
Thread Starter
 
]<ing's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 35
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

So is Procharger a brand name, or a TYPE of supercharger?
Old 06-05-2007, 05:36 PM
  #7  
TECH Resident
iTrader: (16)
 
mr2guru's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Kansas City Area
Posts: 855
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

Originally Posted by ]<ing
So is Procharger a brand name, or a TYPE of supercharger?
Brand name. Similar to vortech in design. Basically a belt driven turbocharger.
Old 06-05-2007, 07:15 PM
  #8  
Staging Lane
iTrader: (1)
 
zeusrotty's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: chicago burbs
Posts: 94
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

what would that cost?
Old 06-05-2007, 10:34 PM
  #9  
Launching!
 
Tony Orlando's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Florida
Posts: 206
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Centrifugal Superchargers are more thermally efficient, but the boost builds exponentially in relation to crank RPMs (therefore your boost peak is right at redline). They provide greater mid and top end power, as opposed to the Roots type which comes on hard but runs out of breath in the upper RPMs.

With the prodigious amount of torque this car comes with from the factory, I'd go with the Procharger for several reasons:

-Easier on the diff
-Easier to launch
-Less heat soak
-Cleaner install
-Better top end

Hope that helps.
Old 06-05-2007, 10:43 PM
  #10  
TECH Regular
 
CTSV05's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Newark, Ohio
Posts: 492
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I've seen and been in cars with both, I like the looks and power of a centrifugal blower, nicer look under the hood imo.
Old 06-05-2007, 11:01 PM
  #11  
Launching!
 
gangbang malloy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: SoCal
Posts: 250
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

as for forced induction you have 4 options
1. roots type - magnacharger/eaton
2. centrifugal - procharger/vortech/paxton/powerdyne
3. twin screw - whipple/kenne bell
4. turbocharger - turbonetics/ aps etc.
Old 06-06-2007, 12:34 AM
  #12  
Teching In
Thread Starter
 
]<ing's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 35
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by gangbang malloy
as for forced induction you have 4 options
1. roots type - magnacharger/eaton
2. centrifugal - procharger/vortech/paxton/powerdyne
3. twin screw - whipple/kenne bell
4. turbocharger - turbonetics/ aps etc.
There are turbo kits available for the V?
Old 06-06-2007, 12:39 AM
  #13  
Teching In
Thread Starter
 
]<ing's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 35
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Tony Orlando
Centrifugal Superchargers are more thermally efficient, but the boost builds exponentially in relation to crank RPMs (therefore your boost peak is right at redline). They provide greater mid and top end power, as opposed to the Roots type which comes on hard but runs out of breath in the upper RPMs.

With the prodigious amount of torque this car comes with from the factory, I'd go with the Procharger for several reasons:

-Easier on the diff
-Easier to launch
-Less heat soak
-Cleaner install
-Better top end

Hope that helps.
Very much so.

Thanks for the input.
Old 06-06-2007, 12:43 AM
  #14  
Teching In
Thread Starter
 
]<ing's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 35
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Exotic Performance Plus
I don't mind pimping. lol...

The ATI ProChargers run cooler, and produce more mid range and upper horsepower, right where you need it.

http://www.exoticperformanceplus.com....html?item=438
ProCharger FAQ's.

http://www.exoticperformanceplus.com....html?item=440
Want to know why an ATI ProCharger is better? Bob
So Centrifical superchargers are most like a turbo than any of the other types of blowers - building power with rpms? I've never owned a FI car if you couldn't tell.

Have you heard of any of these dealer installed packages? I'm assuming a little extra tuning from a reputable shop would be in order.

Last edited by ]<ing; 06-06-2007 at 12:51 AM.
Old 06-06-2007, 04:56 AM
  #15  
EPP
FormerVendor
iTrader: (22)
 
EPP's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Posts: 13,063
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Smile

Originally Posted by zeusrotty
what would that cost?
http://www.exoticperformanceplus.com...html?item=1062
Our ATI ProCharger D-1SC CTS-V kit

http://www.exoticperformanceplus.com....html?item=434
Our completely installed price for the ATI ProCharger D-1SC. Bob
Old 06-06-2007, 01:33 PM
  #16  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (4)
 
04ctsvfl's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 1,206
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

408, 422, 427, 434 would be much sicker, impressive, sound better, more manly (lol), more true to the sport(muscle cars), and probably make more streetable power IMO then boosting the n/a engine of n/a engines......
Old 06-06-2007, 04:53 PM
  #17  
Staging Lane
iTrader: (1)
 
zeusrotty's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: chicago burbs
Posts: 94
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Not as cost effective...
Old 06-06-2007, 06:22 PM
  #18  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (4)
 
04ctsvfl's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 1,206
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

how do you figure.....8300 installed for a procharger?....you could get a crate 408 for what 5k? sell your ls6 for 3k? and youd have 6300 left before you hit the superchargers budget.....and HAVE WAY MORE POWER. gader kad errrrrrr....
Old 06-06-2007, 06:23 PM
  #19  
Launching!
 
gangbang malloy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: SoCal
Posts: 250
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by ]<ing
So Centrifical superchargers are most like a turbo than any of the other types of blowers - building power with rpms? I've never owned a FI car if you couldn't tell.

Have you heard of any of these dealer installed packages? I'm assuming a little extra tuning from a reputable shop would be in order.
yes centriugal superchargers act like a turbo just without all that added heat under the hood, but turbos still make more power
Old 06-06-2007, 07:18 PM
  #20  
Staging Lane
iTrader: (1)
 
zeusrotty's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: chicago burbs
Posts: 94
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

5K? where? payless engines? It would have shitty internals and alot of cubes... Lets not forget the install and swapping of all of the external parts either... Not only will you have a 408 with cheap parts but you wont be able to take it off and get some kind of resale out of the car... Procharger is a one day project at best, and its easier than swapping a whole motor and selling mine.

More cost effective...


Quick Reply: ProCharger -vs- Maggie?



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:13 PM.