Fs: 2005 cts-v
04-14-2011, 10:32 AM
#1
TECH Enthusiast
Thread Starter
iTrader: (7)
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Sacramento
Posts: 537
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Fs: 2005 cts-v http://sacramento.craigslist.org/cto/2323549751.html
**** And for those of you thinking, pfffft! This is the car that gets shitty MPG's, I'm not buying it! (see old thread) this issue is fixed now. My passenger side 02 wasn't plugged in and was causing the issue. The car gets almost what it did stock in terms of MPG's****
**** And for those of you thinking, pfffft! This is the car that gets shitty MPG's, I'm not buying it! (see old thread) this issue is fixed now. My passenger side 02 wasn't plugged in and was causing the issue. The car gets almost what it did stock in terms of MPG's****
Last edited by FRiCK; 04-14-2011 at 11:02 AM.
Trending Topics
04-29-2011, 08:48 AM
#11
TECH Enthusiast
Thread Starter
iTrader: (7)
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Sacramento
Posts: 537
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
04-29-2011, 09:52 AM
#12
TECH Apprentice
iTrader: (4)
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Md.
Posts: 398
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
sale 05 The G-force 9" should stand up just fine...With my power that will be my next mod..I'd be pissed if the 6grand rear blew
especially with the automatic that is going in.....
especially with the automatic that is going in..... 
04-29-2011, 10:33 AM
#14
TECH Enthusiast
Thread Starter
iTrader: (7)
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Sacramento
Posts: 537
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I was unclear. The 9" will allow the car to be... The best car on planet earth lol but there's no way I'm coming up with $5k cash for a rear end. It's not practical at all. And in the cars current state, it will just break again. Plus it's heavy, which doesn't help in the fast or the rear end depts.
04-29-2011, 08:26 PM
#15
