L92 heads+Trex=?
#1
L92 heads+Trex=?
Just wondering what you guys think, but i found a set of L92 for such a good price that if i was to get them, and a intake, i would be about the same as if i got a set of ported LS6 heads, the questions is:
How would my shitbox run with a damn Trex feeding the heads? I just dont want to swap cams as that woudl just screw everything up, just a thought and i doubt i will do it, but i just think it would run like ****.
How would my shitbox run with a damn Trex feeding the heads? I just dont want to swap cams as that woudl just screw everything up, just a thought and i doubt i will do it, but i just think it would run like ****.
#3
FormerVendor
iTrader: (1)
Just wondering what you guys think, but i found a set of L92 for such a good price that if i was to get them, and a intake, i would be about the same as if i got a set of ported LS6 heads, the questions is:
How would my shitbox run with a damn Trex feeding the heads? I just dont want to swap cams as that woudl just screw everything up, just a thought and i doubt i will do it, but i just think it would run like ****.
How would my shitbox run with a damn Trex feeding the heads? I just dont want to swap cams as that woudl just screw everything up, just a thought and i doubt i will do it, but i just think it would run like ****.
Here is my take on that option. First the cam would in no way clear the stock piston. Second thing is that the TRex was designed for a Cathedral port cylinder head. That cam would definitely not like the L92/LS3 head. There are definitely better cams that we could do for those heads, but since I see you said you didn't want to switch the heads, I would highly recommend not doing that setup.
Trending Topics
#11
LS1Tech Co-Founder
iTrader: (34)
Here is my take on that option. First the cam would in no way clear the stock piston. Second thing is that the TRex was designed for a Cathedral port cylinder head. That cam would definitely not like the L92/LS3 head. There are definitely better cams that we could do for those heads, but since I see you said you didn't want to switch the heads, I would highly recommend not doing that setup.
#13
I just see allot of L92 headed combos with random *** cams that i can out run or stop their pull on me that just arent worth a **** since i am rocking the 317s, so i just wonder if it would run that bad in mine as well. Dont see why it wouldnt, but perhaps the single plane carb setup would run the same as it is now.
Why the PTV issues?
Why the PTV issues?
#14
FormerVendor
iTrader: (1)
Yes we have quite a few depending on what the customer wants. Believe it or not you don't have to put really large cams with those heads to make really good power. They normally do like larger splits in the intake and exhaust duration than a cathedral port head does like. One cam that we have had really great luck with on those heads is a 223/236 on a 115LSA. Have quite a few 2010 Camaro's make over 450+ rwhp cam only with this cam. We do have larger profiles than that particular one, and have had good results. We are still constantly developing and testing cams on a weekly basis. I actually am in the process of updating the website to reflect some of the new L92/LS3 based camshafts
#15
FormerVendor
iTrader: (1)
I just see allot of L92 headed combos with random *** cams that i can out run or stop their pull on me that just arent worth a **** since i am rocking the 317s, so i just wonder if it would run that bad in mine as well. Dont see why it wouldnt, but perhaps the single plane carb setup would run the same as it is now.
Why the PTV issues?
Why the PTV issues?
The PTV issue is that the cam is so large it barely fits under a stock Cathedral port head w/ a 2.00" intake valve. Take the L92 head with a 2.165 valve and you now have serious piston hitting valve issues.
#17
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (7)
I am running this cam with my L92's. http://www.summitracing.com/parts/CCA-54-428-11/ It pulls way hard all the way past 7k. I had no piston to valve clearance issues. Its only a .570ish lift.
#18
Old School Heavy
iTrader: (16)
I just see allot of L92 headed combos with random *** cams that i can out run or stop their pull on me that just arent worth a **** since i am rocking the 317s, so i just wonder if it would run that bad in mine as well. Dont see why it wouldnt, but perhaps the single plane carb setup would run the same as it is now.
Why the PTV issues?
Why the PTV issues?
#19
TECH Resident
iTrader: (14)
I am running this cam with my L92's. http://www.summitracing.com/parts/CCA-54-428-11/ It pulls way hard all the way past 7k. I had no piston to valve clearance issues. Its only a .570ish lift.